Mini 1433 - State Farm Mafia - Game over


Forum rules
User avatar
absta101
absta101
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
absta101
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3154
Joined: March 17, 2012
Location: Miami

Post Post #800 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 9:49 am

Post by absta101 »

@SD - You're too kind.
User avatar
Hiraki
Hiraki
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Hiraki
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12372
Joined: September 16, 2010

Post Post #801 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:00 am

Post by Hiraki »

SafetyDance wrote:There is no town motivation for wanting to play a game by the rules outlined and agreed upon by everyone playing this site?
No, there's no town motivation for to get your tits up in a knot.
User avatar
kashoodles
kashoodles
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
kashoodles
Goon
Goon
Posts: 226
Joined: March 11, 2013

Post Post #802 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 11:08 am

Post by kashoodles »

Zdenek wrote:AP's defence of Lurker at the end of day 1 is suspect. Lurker was scum, in my opinion seemed scummy, and looked like he might have ended up being lynched, and AP went out of his way to defend him.

SafetyDance wrote:
RachMarie wrote:
AngryPidgeon wrote:
Lurker claimed 3rd party? Ok, I can get on board with that then.

VOTE: Lurker



You forgot to quote THIS one SD...

Ahem

Attempting to understand reason that post has to do with RandomYoshi or AP's read on RY...
...
...
...
Attempt Failed.

Please, do enlighten.


Seeing a pattern here.

You're implying a lot that AP jumped from RY to Lurker without reason when that's not true.

I actually see where you are coming from with AP dropping RY, but RY hasn't been around for further questions.
User avatar
kashoodles
kashoodles
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
kashoodles
Goon
Goon
Posts: 226
Joined: March 11, 2013

Post Post #803 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 11:14 am

Post by kashoodles »

Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:
AngryPidgeon wrote:
Dear Dr. Zoidberg. The rest of the town may be content to let you pretend to be too carefree to back your bullshit up, but Im pretty sure you are scum. You were a universal townread
So? Scum aren't obligated to kill people who are seen as very-towny. Maybe they tried to pick off a suspected PR. Maybe they no-killed on purpose. There are lots of equally plausible explanations and your reasoning is specious.


I understand picking off a PR but why suggest that there was a no kill?
User avatar
Zdenek
Zdenek
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zdenek
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6827
Joined: August 30, 2010

Post Post #804 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:05 pm

Post by Zdenek »

AngryPidgeon wrote:
Spoiler: Bacde, you know you wanna help me with this one
AngryPidgeon wrote:Ok, Bacde is full of shit.

killerjester wrote:
5. AngryPidgeon, Mafia Roleblocker, alive in Endgame

Zdenek wrote:You're so full of shit.

Jake from State Farm wrote:
5. Zdenek, Mafia Roleblocker, Lynched Day 2

:cop:

This has crossed the line into the unbelievable.

AngryPidgeon wrote:JUST TO BE CLEAR THAT QUOTE FROM THE MOD DID NOT HAPPEN; I AM MAKING A JOKE AND COMPARISON BETWEEN MY/ZD's SCUM PLAY.

So it's a joke and a comparison.
Can we lynch AP?

SafetyDance wrote:
Zdenek wrote:
SafetyDance wrote:I am asking you to be mod-killed based on site-rules about discussion of current games. Fuck your claim.

There is no town motivation for this.

There is no town motivation for wanting to play a game by the rules outlined and agreed upon by everyone playing this site?

There's no town motivation for you to be this dense.

Vote:Zdenek


Bacde wrote:I feel like SD would actually try to get you modkilled for that

Obvious joke comparison is obvious.

absta101 wrote:I will remember this Bacde, we all will.

Zed is mod confirmed scum now.

I love how you make such an emphatic statement and follow it up with just as emphatic reasoning.

You could totally make the Bible Belt vote Obama with such persuasiveness.

Well SD is voting me for non-alignment related reasons, and he's attacking Absta who is saying that I am scum. Him trying to underminine Absta makes no sense.

Unvote
Vote: SafetyDance
I have secret plans and clever tricks.
- The Enormous Crocodile.
User avatar
Zdenek
Zdenek
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zdenek
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6827
Joined: August 30, 2010

Post Post #805 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:08 pm

Post by Zdenek »

Kashoodles
, I asked you something in my last post.
I have secret plans and clever tricks.
- The Enormous Crocodile.
User avatar
Hiraki
Hiraki
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Hiraki
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12372
Joined: September 16, 2010

Post Post #806 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:37 pm

Post by Hiraki »

Oh my god can we just lynch one of these scumbags here and now?
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
User avatar
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
Glenn Peck
Posts: 18863
Joined: June 17, 2012
Location: a Zulfy thread

Post Post #807 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:45 pm

Post by AngryPidgeon »

What ZD or SD? I wouldn't be horribly opposed to SD, but I'm def leaning ZD right now.
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
Goon
Posts: 348
Joined: February 22, 2013

Post Post #808 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:54 pm

Post by Doctor Zoidberg MD »

AngryPidgeon wrote:Yes, scum no killed last night. Thats totally equally plausible. Wuuuuuuuuuuuut.
It's certainly plausible. Maybe you no-killed so you could run your bulletproof gambit. Stranger things have happened in Mafia. You'll note I didn't say it was likely.

So Revenus's VERY FEW posts today totally subverted your read on him from scumscumscum to towntowntown? Like all the stuff he posted yesterday doesnt matter anymore and the stuff he posted today has X-infinity more weight?
Awww Sweetheart, that's so
cute
the way you try to put words in my mouth. I gotta tell you, Snookums, the "scumscumscum" and the "towntowntown," and all that. Yeah Darling it's touching to think that you're so threatened by DGB and I that you have to resort to painfully-transparent mischaracterizations of what I wrote.

:mrgreen: Thanks for making me feel good about myself!

AngryPidgeon wrote:DGB is very capable of being aggressive/caustic as scum.

She is justifying why she wasnt killed by suggesting a nokill and simultaneously saying im dumb.

They are scum.


  1. The post in question was not DGB
  2. That's the 2nd mischaracterization you've tried in as many posts. I suggested a nokill as
    one of many possible explanations
    . You, on the other hand, have such an inflated sense of self-worth that the only explanation you can think of is that scum targeted you?
  3. I didn't say you were dumb (though I might be tempted to at this point). What I said was your reasoning is specious. Go back and read for yourself, Pooty-Pie. You'll see! :wink:
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
Goon
Posts: 348
Joined: February 22, 2013

Post Post #809 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:55 pm

Post by Doctor Zoidberg MD »

kashoodles wrote:
Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:
AngryPidgeon wrote:
Dear Dr. Zoidberg. The rest of the town may be content to let you pretend to be too carefree to back your bullshit up, but Im pretty sure you are scum. You were a universal townread
So? Scum aren't obligated to kill people who are seen as very-towny. Maybe they tried to pick off a suspected PR. Maybe they no-killed on purpose. There are lots of equally plausible explanations and your reasoning is specious.


I understand picking off a PR but why suggest that there was a no kill?


Again, I listed it as one of many possibilities as part of a larger argument: that AngryPidgeon is not imbued with psychic powers, and so his expectations of night phases only carry weight if he is scum.
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
User avatar
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
Glenn Peck
Posts: 18863
Joined: June 17, 2012
Location: a Zulfy thread

Post Post #810 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:04 pm

Post by AngryPidgeon »

Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:You'll note I didn't say it was likely.

You said "equally plausible" as an explanation as to why YOU weren't killed. You listed a bunch of possible night things that were 'equally likely'. Equally likely to what? Me getting targeted and sponging the bullet?

The response feels reallllly off because it doesn't make sense in context of what I as accusing you of, really. Its like you are assuming that I was in fact shot at but acknowledging that there are other things that may have happened.

Im not hiding jackshit. I'm 1x BP and I probably got targeted last night.
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
Goon
Posts: 348
Joined: February 22, 2013

Post Post #811 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:18 pm

Post by Doctor Zoidberg MD »

AngryPidgeon wrote:
Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:You'll note I didn't say it was likely.

You said "equally plausible" as an explanation as to why YOU weren't killed. You listed a bunch of possible night things that were 'equally likely'. Equally likely to what? Me getting targeted and sponging the bullet?
Aww Pookie, it's so adorable when you put words in my mouth. Did I use the phrase "equally likely"? No? Well golly gosh gee, the flattery is making me blush! You must really be scared of us to keep misrepresenting us like this! :oops:

The response feels reallllly off because it doesn't make sense in context of what I as accusing you of, really. Its like you are assuming that I was in fact shot at but acknowledging that there are other things that may have happened.

Im not hiding jackshit. I'm 1x BP and I probably got targeted last night.
I have no reason to disbelieve your claim since at this point there's nothing to refute it. But at the same time I have no reason to believe it, either. It's not like this is a game of deception, right? :lol: You can couch your
un-prompted
claim in whatever macho language you like, but you won't change anything.

In the meantime, by all means feel free to keep pushing this incredibly-flawed argument while parking your vote on Zdenek.
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
User avatar
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
Glenn Peck
Posts: 18863
Joined: June 17, 2012
Location: a Zulfy thread

Post Post #812 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:21 pm

Post by AngryPidgeon »

Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:Did I use the phrase "equally likely"?

Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:equally plausible

Image

Girl, please. I think your team is afraid of me. <3
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
Goon
Posts: 348
Joined: February 22, 2013

Post Post #813 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:23 pm

Post by Doctor Zoidberg MD »

AngryPidgeon wrote:I don't understand the difference between the words "possible," "probable," and "plausible."


Okay.
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
Goon
Posts: 348
Joined: February 22, 2013

Post Post #814 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:24 pm

Post by Doctor Zoidberg MD »

The definition of "Likely" is "probable".

The definition of "Plausible" is "realistic" or perhaps "believeable".

tl;dr use a dictionary.
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
User avatar
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
Glenn Peck
Posts: 18863
Joined: June 17, 2012
Location: a Zulfy thread

Post Post #815 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:26 pm

Post by AngryPidgeon »

Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:I really hope that no one notices just how sideways my AP suspicion is cause hes really obviously town and we even tried to kill him last night, and I just don't have it in my heart to post like Im town so I m just going to argue semantics that ultimately don't mean much. I mean, FFS, I told AP that his point was shit and he is scum, but apparently I don't believe that because I can't stop arguing minor details about his points and acknowledging his points which I said were shitty.


tl;dr: EQUALLY plausible. The qualifier mattes too, honey. And it very much implies that probability of all the events in question was roughly EQUAL.
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
Goon
Posts: 348
Joined: February 22, 2013

Post Post #816 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:27 pm

Post by Doctor Zoidberg MD »

Nope! Plausibility and Probability are not the same thing!

Keep trying, Sugar-Lips!
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
User avatar
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
Glenn Peck
Posts: 18863
Joined: June 17, 2012
Location: a Zulfy thread

Post Post #817 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:29 pm

Post by AngryPidgeon »

Girl, I can read into subtext that you haven't even posted yet.

But you are just going to kill me tonight, so thats cool. Can I at least get you to bus Zdenek?
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Zoidberg MD
Goon
Goon
Posts: 348
Joined: February 22, 2013

Post Post #818 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:31 pm

Post by Doctor Zoidberg MD »

What it means is that (in my opinion) those are all equally believable or reasonable events.

When you try to nit-pick and use it as the basis of an argument, you owe it to yourself to at least understand the words you're using as the basis of the argument. Now you've wasted everyone else's time with 2 pages of nonsense they have to read.
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
User avatar
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
Glenn Peck
Posts: 18863
Joined: June 17, 2012
Location: a Zulfy thread

Post Post #819 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:35 pm

Post by AngryPidgeon »

True, this argument is kind of pointless and it won't reach anyone prolly. But I just wanna call you adorable or something.

tl;dr: Your response is unnatural. If you really thought I was scum / thought my point was 100% useless, you wouldn't be so worked up about defending from it.
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
User avatar
User avatar
AngryPidgeon
Glenn Peck
Glenn Peck
Posts: 18863
Joined: June 17, 2012
Location: a Zulfy thread

Post Post #820 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:37 pm

Post by AngryPidgeon »

Also also I will admit Im making some assumptions here and you aren't really lynchable right now, so I'd rather lynch someone else {ZD/Rev/SD} and see what happens tonight.
User avatar
SafetyDance
SafetyDance
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
SafetyDance
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1815
Joined: November 24, 2012

Post Post #821 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:43 pm

Post by SafetyDance »

RachMarie wrote:Nothing to do with his read on RY, but explains why he jumped off of RY to hammer Lurker.

Not liking the way you are hinting on AP. If you really think he is scum for this you should come out and say so.

So if his vote on Lurker is because he was the SK, what relevancy does that have to do with his reads and D2 distancing on RY? IE, go back and read my initial statement without the typo.

Are you implying that because he switched to lurker, any thoughts of RY just magically disappeared? W.T.F

I am saying, what I am saying. Go back, read, comprehend, then tank me afterwards for being to pateint and guiding you on your path of enlightenment.

kashoodles wrote:
Seeing a pattern here.

You're implying a lot that AP jumped from RY to Lurker without reason when that's not true.

I actually see where you are coming from with AP dropping RY, but RY hasn't been around for further questions.

What the fuck does AP's hammer on Lurker got to do with his reads on RY? Like RM, you must be then implying that since he hopped off RY and onto Lurker, it all evaporated into thin air? Is that what you're implying? If it's not, how the fuck is it in any way conducive or relevant?

So if RY hasn't been around, and he's (meant to be) a top scumspect of AP, why's AP not getting annoyed like he said he does?
User avatar
SafetyDance
SafetyDance
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
SafetyDance
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1815
Joined: November 24, 2012

Post Post #822 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:45 pm

Post by SafetyDance »

Zdenek wrote:
Well SD is voting me for non-alignment related reasons, and he's attacking Absta who is saying that I am scum. Him trying to underminine Absta makes no sense.

Unvote
Vote: SafetyDance

Oh look, spot the OMGUS. Also spot the comprehension fail from a player who's incapable of reading and comprehending what the words 'mod' and 'confirmed' mean when they're put together at the from of another word.

Btw,

Zdenek wrote:
Well SD is voting me for non-alignment related reasons

Zdenek wrote:
There is no town motivation for this.

MAKE UP YOUR MIND

Hiraki wrote:
SafetyDance wrote:There is no town motivation for wanting to play a game by the rules outlined and agreed upon by everyone playing this site?
No, there's no town motivation for to get your tits up in a knot.

I'm calling someone out for obvious bullshit based on breaking rules in the game. Frankly, what has alignment got to do with it?

AngryPidgeon wrote:What ZD or SD? I wouldn't be horribly opposed to SD, but I'm def leaning ZD right now.

@Town, its totally cool to be carefree and content to let this guy not back up his bullshit.
User avatar
SafetyDance
SafetyDance
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
SafetyDance
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1815
Joined: November 24, 2012

Post Post #823 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:47 pm

Post by SafetyDance »

AngryPidgeon wrote:Also also I will admit Im making some assumptions here and you aren't really lynchable right now, so I'd rather lynch someone else {ZD/Rev/SD} and see what happens tonight.

HAVE YOU SEEN THIS PLAYER?
Image
He's an excitable little fellow, about yay-high, rather wheaty looking in complexion and an excitable chap. Loves lunchtimes.
User avatar
Bacde
Bacde
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Bacde
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8633
Joined: August 23, 2005
Location: In the town milieu

Post Post #824 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 2:08 pm

Post by Bacde »

SafetyDance wrote:
AngryPidgeon wrote:Also also I will admit Im making some assumptions here and you aren't really lynchable right now, so I'd rather lynch someone else {ZD/Rev/SD} and see what happens tonight.

HAVE YOU SEEN THIS PLAYER?
Image
He's an excitable little fellow, about yay-high, rather wheaty looking in complexion and an excitable chap. Loves lunchtimes.

ok this shit is hilarious

I don't think I wanna lynch SD

AP vs. Dr. Z was literally an argument of semantics

I wanna know whats going on w/ RY's slot

@Mod Requesting a replacement for RandomYoshi
Locked