↑ mrbungle wrote:
lol i've already explained my reasoning for my vote.... you should read the thread. see post #35. points #2 and 3 in that post are the reason I voted. admittedly those 2 points are fairly weak, but there's also point #1 which came after my vote. and even now, after he's posted a few more times, he's still being completely useless. pirate's given a few town reads but any scum can easily do that. apparently he's not suspicious of anything which is a good indicator that he could be mafia.
I'm sorry, after I submitted that post I found out there was a second page already to this thread. but then I thought it would be against the rules to delete that post.
↑ mrbungle wrote:
Being a newbie and asking a ton of questions is fine, but is there anyone you think might be mafia so far?
Actually, just you so far. Sometimes people who come off as overly townsided end up being maf. And all your reasons for tearing apart pirates' one single two-word post are over the top, imo. None of those reasons are really very valid at all, so it just sounds like you're grasping at straws to throw suspicion onto Pirate.
I also slightly suspect FLLhawk for voting for the one who self-voted. If I was maf, I would want to vote for someone who already had a vote on them in hopes of creating a bandwagon type of thing. I don't know if that's a strategy people do here, though. Personally, though, I was also tempted to vote for the one who self-voted because I tend to think self-voting people don't really want to play seriously and might actually be maf. But, your explanation in another post enlightened me about how self-voting can be a conversation starter to lure out more information. So, I changed my mind about suspecting the self-voter. but i still kinda suspect FLLhawk.