Ah, of course that's the WIFOM in it, but then it comes down to whether or not you think fuzzy is the kind of player to do that (and to be frank, based on the last time I actually saw you play, I don't really think you could; could be wrong).In post 349, Mist7676 wrote:Honestly, I didn't think of that. But wouldn't he not change his play style, knowing it was being watched?
Strengthen? Shouldn't there be now doubt at this point?In post 353, fuzzybutternut wrote:Im awake now.
The thing with Mist is that she tunneled me from her first post. She tries to play it off as a reaction test, but I didn't react in any way, other than saying it was scummy what she did. Voided is pretty much conf town now, which only strengthens my read on mist.
Why would there be doubt?In post 354, Mist7676 wrote:Strengthen? Shouldn't there be now doubt at this point?
Not what I'm talking about.In post 357, fuzzybutternut wrote:I think that was supposed to say "no doubt," honestly.
He is right, no doubt, is the actual words I meant.In post 356, Voidedmafia wrote:Why would there be doubt?In post 354, Mist7676 wrote:Strengthen? Shouldn't there be now doubt at this point?
Would it have been a little funny if I hammered that night? NOt necessarily as soon as I saw the vote, but before I went to bed.In post 363, fuzzybutternut wrote:I really thought it was pretty obvious what I meant. Before I voted, I knew there was a possibility that Voided was scum, and I was taking a big risk voting you, but, since he hasn't hammered one of us yet, it's pretty obvious that he isn't. Therefore, by him not hammering, it strengthened my read on you, thus guaranteeing that you are scum.
If you were scum, you would've voted one of us, because it wouldn't matterIn post 367, Voidedmafia wrote:Would it have been a little funny if I hammered that night? NOt necessarily as soon as I saw the vote, but before I went to bed.In post 363, fuzzybutternut wrote:I really thought it was pretty obvious what I meant. Before I voted, I knew there was a possibility that Voided was scum, and I was taking a big risk voting you, but, since he hasn't hammered one of us yet, it's pretty obvious that he isn't. Therefore, by him not hammering, it strengthened my read on you, thus guaranteeing that you are scum.
No, I mean, how would you have reacted if I initially didn't vote at first, but hammered before I went to bed?In post 369, fuzzybutternut wrote:If you were scum, you would've voted one of us, because it wouldn't matter who you voted.
I'll have to accept your word that that's what you assumed. It doesn't sound like you believed that what he meant was what he was saying.In post 362, Mist7676 wrote:Well, by strengthened, I assumed he meant made it better. Of course I knew, what meant, I just didn't like his choice of words.