You're so full of shit.
Explain?
No please don't, I'd rather not listen to more bullshit.
How exactly am I opportunistic?In post 553, buldermar wrote:Actually fuck this. You don't push a wagon like crazy and declare your vote permanently placed on someone only to vote someone else without any explanation as town. You'reopportunisticas fuck.
VOTE: orc
His play seems like his play in borkgame where tunneling is concerned, and the game needs a bit of a shakeup.fferyllt wrote:Explain?
I've been thinking that his play in this game seems different from the early borkgame where he tunneled you/me over a symbolic construct of something you hadn't meant and arguably hadn't said.In post 555, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:His play seems like his play in borkgame where tunneling is concerned, and the game needs a bit of a shakeup.fferyllt wrote:Explain?
Not liking it.What do you think of Buldermar's vote?
You bin' huffin' glue again, boy?
If you're going to reference the worst scum game I've ever had to play, you could at least offer some quotes.In post 555, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:His play seems like his play in borkgame where tunneling is concerned, and the game needs a bit of a shakeup.
... I have him listed as scum. Mollie has him listed as town.In post 557, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:and I don't see why he's sheeping mollie so blatantly on the buldermar read.
Lol, so what happened to "My vote is firmly placed on your for the rest of this day"?In post 555, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:How exactly am I opportunistic?In post 553, buldermar wrote:Actually fuck this. You don't push a wagon like crazy and declare your vote permanently placed on someone only to vote someone else without any explanation as town. You'reopportunisticas fuck.
VOTE: orc
His play seems like his play in borkgame where tunneling is concerned, and the game needs a bit of a shakeup.fferyllt wrote:Explain?
What do you think of Buldermar's vote?
What are you not liking about it?In post 556, fferyllt wrote:Not liking it.
Hahaha.. Not in a million years would you refrain from pushing my lynch as town only because mollie thinks I'm town. No way.In post 561, Majiffy wrote:You're not wrong, but "sheeping" and trusting someone with different player strengths (reading meta of players she often plays with to a high degree of accuracy) to read someone until proven incapable or otherwise untrustworthy is a very large logical leap.
I don't think I'm wrong about orcinus.In post 563, buldermar wrote:What are you not liking about it?In post 556, fferyllt wrote:Not liking it.
You said you weren't certain the last time I asked. What changed?In post 565, fferyllt wrote:I don't think I'm wrong about orcinus.In post 563, buldermar wrote:What are you not liking about it?In post 556, fferyllt wrote:Not liking it.
Nothing has changed. I am not certain, but I don't think I am wrong.In post 567, buldermar wrote:You said you weren't certain the last time I asked. What changed?In post 565, fferyllt wrote:I don't think I'm wrong about orcinus.In post 563, buldermar wrote:What are you not liking about it?In post 556, fferyllt wrote:Not liking it.
I'm inclined to agree with thisIn post 564, buldermar wrote:Hahaha.. Not in a million years would you refrain from pushing my lynch as town only because mollie thinks I'm town. No way.In post 561, Majiffy wrote:You're not wrong, but "sheeping" and trusting someone with different player strengths (reading meta of players she often plays with to a high degree of accuracy) to read someone until proven incapable or otherwise untrustworthy is a very large logical leap.
UNVOTE:In post 568, fferyllt wrote:Nothing has changed. I am not certain, but I don't think I am wrong.In post 567, buldermar wrote:You said you weren't certain the last time I asked. What changed?In post 565, fferyllt wrote:I don't think I'm wrong about orcinus.In post 563, buldermar wrote:What are you not liking about it?In post 556, fferyllt wrote:Not liking it.
Is this a semantic quibble?
See this is the problem. Now I'm thinking that the only reason you're agreeing is because Majiffy is your new retardo-tunnel-target, which still makes your read absolutely useless to me.In post 569, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:I'm inclined to agree with thisIn post 564, buldermar wrote:Hahaha.. Not in a million years would you refrain from pushing my lynch as town only because mollie thinks I'm town. No way.In post 561, Majiffy wrote:You're not wrong, but "sheeping" and trusting someone with different player strengths (reading meta of players she often plays with to a high degree of accuracy) to read someone until proven incapable or otherwise untrustworthy is a very large logical leap.
yeah its almost as if he final voted and then changed his mind or something!In post 553, buldermar wrote:Actually fuck this. You don't push a wagon like crazy and declare your vote permanently placed on someone only to vote someone else without any explanation as town. You're opportunistic as fuck.
VOTE: orc
That's essentially what he did, but ff says he's town and I havn't found much reason to think she's scum other than that one thing I've already mentioned.In post 573, pirate mollie wrote:yeah its almost as if he final voted and then changed his mind or something!In post 553, buldermar wrote:Actually fuck this. You don't push a wagon like crazy and declare your vote permanently placed on someone only to vote someone else without any explanation as town. You're opportunistic as fuck.
VOTE: orc
