[2] Nachomamma8: mrbungle, gene1991,
[1] mrbungle: BlazeJP,
Not Voting: David Jones, Nachomamma8, leviathan93, Chkflip,
With 7 alive it is 4 to lynch
Deadline: (expired on 2013-05-15 13:11:28)
Sooo...... you really think I made up those quotes? Did you bother to look through nic's other games yourself to see whether I did or not? Because they are all in there. Don't accuse me of being a fucking liar when the evidence to the contrary is RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE and you're just too lazy to look it up.In post 472, BlazeJP wrote:
Why should I blindly believe those quotes, especially since it turns out Nic was town? It was either awful town play on mrbungle's behalf or a scum ploy that worked.
yeah what a bunch of bsIn post 476, Nachomamma8 wrote:I'm gonna be back later today i lost everything
don't you fucking hammer me
I don't see a correlation between how much somebody types or posts and their affiliation. What counts is the quality and content.In post 479, mrbungle wrote:blaze you really think i'm mafia? you realize I've put more effort into this game than everyone else combined? that I have more than a 1/4th of the total posts in the thread?
here is a link to my filter from one of my town games on a different wesbite. you'll see that my posting style is much the same as it is here. you say that I'm "posting like crazy." This is because I am very motivated! I care a lot about the game! I think you're being turned off by my aggression. On that site I just linked you, I am about as aggressive as the average player. It's not me "causing confusion," it's just how I play town. I'll link you more of my games from that site if you aren't satisifed that this is in fact my town play.In post 469, David Jones wrote:every thing you have been doing was scummy to me .... i dont know if i'm seeing thing differently or anything this is it1.Can you summarize why I'm your main scumread?
-your rapid finger pointing and moving from one lynch to another and asking others to lynch your scum reads ....this is like fake scumhunting ....you were posting like crazy in a 20 day game to get someone/anyone lynched ...it was like posing as scum hunting but creating more confusion then try to lynch anyone so the number goes down by 1
You're suspicious of me for how quickly I gave gene such a strong read. Remember that I am used to playing in 48-hr day formats. That means when I'm in a game I'm constantly reading the thread. I re-read things at least every few hours. I'm used to having to form reads very quickly, within the first 48 hours of a game. I've also watched a lot of newbie games. I've hosted a few of them and I've even coached one. I have A LOT of experience seeing how new players think. This is how I was able to so confidently read gene as town that early on. Experience with newbs + being used to forming reads with the first couple daysIn post 469, David Jones wrote: -your absolute declaration of gene as townie in Day1 ....i've played some mafia games before joining here and one thing i learned for sure is in this game you are guilty until proven innocent ....never have i seen someone say they completely trust others in Day1 ...even cops dont do that in a Night start game...
was gene showing town like tells - yes of course ....at that time i would say 70% town i wouldn't go and say "gene is obviously town" ... when you almost declared gene as town for me it seemed like you were trying to warm up gene earn his trust ....forming a little town group among urselves
yeah there's not much I can say about this. i messed up the D1 lynch because I was too eager to see a flip. i'm not used to waiting forever and the slow pace of this game really frustrates me.In post 469, David Jones wrote: -your lynch on nic as i explained before you tried to nail him twice .....getting to L-1 for absolutely no good reason ...nic was a bit suspicious but definitely not enough to get him to L-1 ...atleast his self vote should have cleared him partially ....as i've said previous post mafia rarely if not never self vote ...it puts them in the spot light and get them a lot of attention .....normally a mafia doesn't want that ....i could go as far as to say 8 out of 10 times a self voter will end up town ,.....but knowing all this as you are experienced you lynched him for inactivity(which is not a solid scum tell) ...nic was a bit suspicious but not enough to lynch him or anything
how long do we get to let nacho live and just keep bullshitting us? he's posted twice since D2 started, and both posts were along the lines of "i'll bbl." he has nothing to say because he is mafia. also, you're assertion that I'm scummy for pushing an early nacho lynch only holds water if nacho flips town. so it's unfair of you to make accusations like that until AFTER you see nacho's flip. I take responsibility for the D1 mislynch. I will take responsibility if nacho flips town. Honestly if nacho flips town then I probably deserve to lose this game. But don't accuse me of being scummy for wanting to flip nacho when we don't even know nacho's alignment.In post 469, David Jones wrote: -now you are again trying to target someone who is inactive and lynch them before even hearing their response ...^ this you are practically trying to manipulate me into lynching/hammering naccho even before he comes online and defends himselfWe need 4 votes to lynch scum. I know that gene is willing to work with me and I think levi is too and I think they're both town. I have no idea if mollie is actually replacing or how her replacement will play, so I NEED to find a way to get you to cooperate with me.
i translate the above sentence like this "i've voted for nacho, gene will vote whoever i vote , i think i can convince levi , i dont care about mollie for now ....so if you vote for nacho we can successfully kill him this day"
and thats the way i see it
Hmmm. Pirate has said similar things and so has david jones. You guys are mistaking my aggression and motivation for scum play. Perhaps you haven't read the thread yet so I'll explain where I'm coming from yet again. I come from a place where we have 48 hour D1 deadlines. That's 48 hours to chose the first lynch! People over there have to post a lot, and they have to be aggressive in order to get things done. It's just my playstyle. Read my recent response to davy for more on this subject.In post 482, BlazeJP wrote:You've got some anger issues bab, I'd get those seen to before you hurt any small animals.
I don't see a correlation between how much somebody types or posts and their affiliation. What counts is the quality and content.In post 479, mrbungle wrote:blaze you really think i'm mafia? you realize I've put more effort into this game than everyone else combined? that I have more than a 1/4th of the total posts in the thread?
Yours is awful. Muddled, confusing, going off in seemingly every direction. It comes across as somebody desperately trying to create enough doubt in other places to use a shield to protect themselves.
I didn't accuse you of lying bab, I said why should I blindly accept those quotes; context, time, subject etc would all have an effect on posting style. As a base argument and point it was weak and as it turned out completely wrong. So, so horribly wrong. About as wrong as wrong can be. But fair play to you, I think that was your intention.
Again, asking questions that don't need to be asked, creating more talk, more possible confusion and a chance at deflecting attention. I already covered that, apart from you as scum and David and Gene as possible town I haven't got strong reads of anyone and until I get used to the format I doubt I will.Who else do you think is mafia? You've barely shared any reads so far.
This is where I completely disagree with you.In post 485, BlazeJP wrote:Again, asking questions that don't need to be asked, creating more talk, more possible confusion and a chance at deflecting attention. I already covered that, apart from you as scum and David and Gene as possible town I haven't got strong reads of anyone and until I get used to the format I doubt I will.Who else do you think is mafia? You've barely shared any reads so far.
I get the difference between play styles but if you are town that's probably why I think you're not, seem too aggressive and needing to be believed.Got days and days left before the next lynch, what we think now isn't that important,it's just building blocks for the next few days.
i also want to point out how easy it is for you to, in hindsight, call that case "horribly wrong." go back and look at the page where it happened. remy, who flipped town strongly agreed with the case. gene, who might be the most obvious town read in this game agreed with the case. so don't act as if it wasn't completely without merit because both a CONFIRMED town and gene both agreed with it.In post 482, BlazeJP wrote: I didn't accuse you of lying bab, I said why should I blindly accept those quotes; context, time, subject etc would all have an effect on posting style. As a base argument and point it was weak and as it turned out completely wrong. So, so horribly wrong. About as wrong as wrong can be. But fair play to you, I think that was your intention.
That's kind of proof he's town. Maf just would not come off that way. Maybe I shouldn't say this out loud, but he kind of comes off as a cop who has a guilty report on nacho than as a maf who is desperate to lynch anyone at all.In post 485, BlazeJP wrote: I get the difference between play styles but if you are town that's probably why I think you're not,seem too aggressive and needing to be believed. Got days and days left before the next lynch, what we think now isn't that important, it's just building blocks for the next few days.
lol what a buzzkill. thread is dead atmIn post 490, chkflip wrote:With deadline forever away, you'll have to afford me a couple days to catch up with things.