you are falling for it again buldey. she is fucking manipulating you. I am telling you she is lying about something.In post 1257, buldermar wrote:I can understand this, and if you actually are an assassin I really do appreciate that you're still caring enough to even check the game. And to be fair, you're still contributing way more than several other players in this game, so I don't think anyone could rightfully complain - even disregarding the fact that you don't have a shot at winning, according to yourself.In post 1254, fferyllt wrote:I thought you agreed with most of it, though I think your read of orcinus is influenced by mine. My read of Minimal is influenced by orcinus. And my read of Mac is influenced by you.In post 1253, buldermar wrote:I believe it should be obvious that I agree on the rest as well from my previous posts.In post 1252, fferyllt wrote:only that?In post 1251, buldermar wrote:This I agree with.In post 1247, fferyllt wrote:HD - participation level scares me a little
This is a weird game. I've never played with no avenue (however remote) for winning before, but I in essence lost the game before it started due to my night action choices. The crater where motivation is supposed to be seriously disrupts my thoughts about the game.
buldermar [2/5] - DCLXVI, Majiffy
Majiffy [2/5] - fferyllt, buldermar
DCLXVI [1/5] - Human Destroyer
Abstained (Not Voting): pirate mollie, Mac