I'm telling you that one head of the hydra is dropping towntells that I am 90% confident about. This means you can either ignore my opinion on someone I clearly know better than you (since even a cursory meta look will see that yeah, Majiffy rarely explains his reads), or you can waste that vote for however more pages you keep it there.
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
In post 317, Amethyst Kitty wrote:I don't like the idea of mass claiming. I rather not at least not on Day1.
Why not?
HD, Mollie is town, so you'll have to put up with Majiffy.
I, personally, feel that a massclaim D1 is in more favor of the scum. We don't know what PRs the town has.. Maybe the PRs are better left hidden rather then straight up claiming.
I also feel that random NKs give off more information to use as a tool against scum then NKs that are brought on thanks to a massclaim.
In post 323, Om the Destroyer wrote:Well thanks for admitting it upfront that these reads have no real basis I guess?
And no, agreeing with you is not a basis and not necessarily town motivated, and I know you're a better player than that.
All of my reads have basis. Thanks for being an opportunistic little twit, scumbutt!
Town motivation comes before action, not the other way around. Your logic is flawed.
In post 324, Cephrir wrote:Wow, that's a ridiculously self-centered viewpoint. By that logic anyone who suspects you is scum.
Welcome to my scumlist.
Not true. I know my alignment is town, but only because of my role PM. Other players didn't receive my role PM, ergo their conclusion can differ from my own in regards to my alignment.
But you're a scumbutt, so you needed a way to OMGUS me, eh?
Townies are going to be able to look at the same information as you and come to different conclusions, even if you are town. Welcome to mafia. Welcome to earth. You are not the standard for objectivity. This is patently obvious. Not to mention, guess what? Scum can piggyback on a townie's opinion because they know it's one that came from a townie and therefore a legitimate conclusion that someone could have reached! "He agrees with me": Not a towntell since ever.
In post 321, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:Papa don't roll that way. Don't want to be giving scumbutts like you legitimate reads to sheep reasons from.
UNVOTE: VOTE: BeautyAndTheBeast
Well thanks for admitting it upfront that these reads have no real basis I guess?
And no, agreeing with you is not a basis and not necessarily town motivated, and I know you're a better player than that.
~
In post 324, Cephrir wrote:Wow, that's a ridiculously self-centered viewpoint. By that logic anyone who suspects you is scum.
Welcome to my scumlist.
People on this site need to get the fuck over this mentality that everything all at once has to be shared with them because it doesn't.
Actions like this definitely do not paint towards "omg scum!"
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 336, Cephrir wrote:Townies are going to be able to look at the same information as you and come to different conclusions, even if you are town. Welcome to mafia. Welcome to earth. You are not the standard for objectivity. This is patently obvious.
You sound a little butthurt. Is it because you're caught scum? I think it's because you're caught scum.
In post 336, Cephrir wrote:Not to mention, guess what? Scum can piggyback on a townie's opinion because they know it's one that came from a townie and therefore a legitimate conclusion that someone could have reached! "He agrees with me"
You mean, like why I'm not giving all the reasons behind all my reads?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 313, Om the Destroyer wrote:
Majiffy's "oh you must not think highly of him then!" is a somewhat-subtle "yes thor is awesome go fuck yourself"
Om's recent posts are hilarious, because they either mean that they are not familiar with Majiffy's meta at all, or that they are scum trying to push for an early mislynch on a player that tends to look anti-town. The buddying accusation is my favorite, as Majiffy doesn't buddy up to anyone, except for Majiffy. I suggest watching this wagon closely, as I can see scum pushing it hard.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
In post 336, Cephrir wrote:Not to mention, guess what? Scum can piggyback on a townie's opinion because they know it's one that came from a townie and therefore a legitimate conclusion that someone could have reached! "He agrees with me"
You mean, like why I'm not giving all the reasons behind all my reads?
Oh shit, look at that.
I'm arguing with the part where you said Slandaar and AA9 are town for no other reason than agreeing with you, not because you refuse to give reasons. Though I can't say I'm especially a fan of that either.