Not liking this. Zefiends vote was valid. Scum have to try to make town look scummy. Sometimes you can tell when their behaviour seems forced.Hapa wrote:...did you just vote me for trying too hard?
Are you dumb or scum? Tell me which so I can adjust my vote accordingly.
That's null.The most important thing about this post is that it shows that Daemon isn't reading the thread. Toomai initially had his vote parked on Varsoon, but had moved it before Daemon made this post.
Agreed. That's the worst part of his post.Also, it wasn't an interesting start to the day
Nice, throwing bs suspicion on the person who voted you is an awesome technique.Versoon wrote:Toomai put a vote on me and he jumped on that wagon real fast
Scummy. Using weird is too vague and unclear. It seems like you want to set up a vote on him later.Dyslex wrote:NC's vote and explanation is weird. I don't get it.
Fair enough. Passing up a chance to vote Nic. I take back what I said.@hp, I'd rather stay in my lighthouse where I live, with my binocular, sipping on some coffee. Aka, wait with a vote until I get the urge to read more carefully through. Seems like votes are flying high anyways. Keep it up sports!
Terrible reason to call someone scummy. What do you mean by "his post is iffy" exactly?acfan wrote:His first post wasvery iffyand he hasn't posted since then; it could just be his newness clouding his actions but for the moment I think this is a good place for my vote.
Good point.Hapa wrote:I get that it's possible not to be sure of things at this stage, but geez don't you have any questions to ask? Aren't you curious about anything?
There are many sane combinations of scumteams, but myself and Varsoon probably isn't one of them. Also I'm not thrilled about how you've disappeared off the face of the earth of late. You've acted townie in the early game, but I find myself questioning that read given how much name-dropping you're doing compared with actual analysis.Is the scum team Varsoon/Hapa/RainbowJake?
Oh good a list of baseless reads. Exactly what I meant.In post 138, Varsoon wrote:Thanks, Scott, but it's too endearing to call me scum like that.
I'd like a GCBC flip or a NicCage flip.
Although, I really like Nic, so I guess,
Either a Toomai flip or a hapahauli flip would also be good.
Would you like concrete reads?
Here you go. No nulls.
ACFAN: Scum.
CHEERPIE: Town.
DAEMON: Scum.
DYSLEXICON: Scum.
GCBC: Scum.
HAPAH: Town.
HPLEAVES: Town.
PONYJAKE: Scum.
NICCAGE: Scum.
QWINTS: Scum.
SCOTT: Scum.
TOOMAI: Town.
ZEFIEND: Scum.
Too many players with less than 5 posts.
Unacceptable.
Out of everything that has happened since your previous post to this one, THIS is the one point you make?In post 158, Daemon385 wrote:That's fair it does bring up ideas and topics that were not going on in the first place. Which is a bit of what I did in my original post (though again a bit mis-launched on my part)In post 151, Varsoon wrote:I've also had more free time in my other games, and I was trying a more direct approach. Notice that I'm also fairly direct in previous scum games, too.
Sometimes I just write things to see what people'll say about 'em.
Don't like this at all. The blatant sheeping with no addition, then the following post is just empty talk about everyone agreeing? Looks like filler. Still like my Varsoon vote, but Dys is my second choice.In post 176, Dyslexicon wrote:I'm sorry I haven't been contributing more. Finals are proving hell. With such vocal townish play from Hapa there's gonna be mostly baaaaa anyways.
I strongly agree with Zef's post #168 where he agrees with some other players. Sheepasheep.
VOTE: NC
Are you scared of past content? It's still valid for what your alignment might beIn post 182, hapahauli wrote:Also, why are you grave-digging my posts? I made that analysis on Daemon many days ago. The least you can do is look at my recent content.
I'm not. I'm just fairly annoyed why the "good" half of GBGC took one of my posts to call me scummy and failing to take into account my 46 (now 47) other posts.In post 184, Cheery Pie wrote:Are you scared of past content? It's still valid for what your alignment might beIn post 182, hapahauli wrote:Also, why are you grave-digging my posts? I made that analysis on Daemon many days ago. The least you can do is look at my recent content.
There's no need to be focused only on the present.
Regarding the bolded, have you ever caught scum with this heuristic? This is a yes or no question.hap seems town, althoughhe is acting strangely/almost coaching towards Varsoon which is concerning. He unvotes after a weak catchup post citing that Varsoon appears to be more active, and is generally being overly helpful specifically towards Varsoon.
Liking GCBC for town, especially with recent GC commentary.
I thought that recent GC commentary was terrible. He dug through the first few pages of the game and made reads. After being gone for 5 days, that's the best he can do? He admitted to being too bored to finish reading the damn game. Making reads on incomplete information is terribly irresponsible.
Um, I'm not going to make up points when I don't have any. I wouldn't consider it filler when my vote counts as much as anyones.In post 183, Scott Brosius wrote:Don't like this at all. The blatant sheeping with no addition, then the following post is just empty talk about everyone agreeing? Looks like filler. Still like my Varsoon vote, but Dys is my second choice.
