In post 885, Nero Cain wrote:
I was in a game awhle back and I really really really thought some newbie was scum and they made a post that I thought was really really scummy and too dumb to come from town. Krab said something very similar and it made me pause.
In post 551, Krab Bucket wrote:Claiming neutral, then demanding that a Vigi goes on one of the most pro-town players in the game at this moment in time?
Sure, its not impossible for this to come from scum and I don't think I'll cry but well, I just rather see other players lynched.
Ehhhhh...
Not really seeing how that could be a Townslip, to be honest with you. Would it be possible/feasible to dig up that other newbie's post and link us to it so we have a frame of reference? That would be really helpful.
If not, though, don't sweat it.
In post 887, Svenskt Stål wrote:I have a hard time seeing scum first playing with the idea of claiming...then not going throu with it.
Except Krab didn't have to make the decision of whether he should go through with it or not. He realized that he shot himself in the foot and replaced out specifically so he wouldn't have to go through with it.
In post 892, Darthe wrote:I mean, yeah it is day one but we should at least be involved with one another rather than certain groups on other groups right?
How are we not "involved with one another"? Who are these "certain groups"?
Put yourself in Krab Bucket's (probably soggy) shoes. You get some heat on you, and in an effort to get rid of some of it, you decide to say "Might as well claim soon." Under what circumstances would you make that statement? Would you make that statement if you were a Vanilla Townie? No, you wouldn't. You would only say that if you were a PR whose claim was worth a damn or if you were Scum who was trying to bluff her way out of a sticky situation. Which of those two possibilities do you think applies to Krab Bucket?