How so?
Both Mara and I just questioned it on skype.
<3 Unfortunately, I don't have stats for this yet, but on the other side there are so many more scummy things Nacho has done so my scum read on him has to do with more then just this. This is a legit point though, I don't know why Mala got ignored for this. Maybe cause it's right?In post 317, Amethyst Kitty wrote:Heh, Nacho could be scum for giving a summary of a thread
*Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr*In post 633, Malakittens wrote:Probably due to us. Idk.
You're not reading very carefully, are you?In post 448, EddieFenix wrote:Him trying to lead the town to vote someone day 1with no real backing, and the overall attitude of the player has my scum radar going off the charts right now.
Also lol @ you voting me for pushing a lynch "with no real backing" and then this is your given reason for voting me.In post 455, EddieFenix wrote:Kept it short and sweet because I think he is scum and that's where I want my vote.In post 452, Nero Cain wrote:ok, why did your catchup post contain nothing but a vote for B&TB?In post 450, EddieFenix wrote:Lol. Let's dance, Baby boy.In post 442, Nero Cain wrote:leave the stupid fruit alone, Nero is town and even derp as fuck Mollie knows it. Now lets all kill Fenix.
wegotabadasshere.jpgIn post 465, EddieFenix wrote: And if the steamroll happens, it happens. I could careless about someone's "meta" because they can use that said meta to play/look a certain way on either side of the ball. So, at the current time, I don't trust, ANYONE, but me.
In post 490, DLG wrote:Yes,perpetuating. Your first 11 posts were all bullshit banter. That means you were keeping the pre-game stuff non-game related. Perpetuating it, even. The question was why you shifted gears when someone else changed the tenor of the conversation.
You didn't see anything scummy, fine. But, your posts weren't designed to find anything scummy, either. So, again, I ask, why did you shift your style when someone else changed the game environment?
The above signifies taking active, meaningful action in response to something trying to stop a situation. You'll note that I did not do this; as soon as something came along that I perceived could push us out of RVS, I followed up on it. This is the exactper·pet·u·ate
/pərˈpeCHo͞oˌāt/
Verb
Make (something, typically an undesirable situation or an unfounded belief) continue indefinitely.
Preserve (something valued) from oblivion or extinction.
Yes, buddy me, that will make me think you're town.In post 490, DLG wrote: All things considered, I think you're slot isn't scum. The answers both of your heads gave regarding potential scum motivation in your posts seem consistent with a Town mindset much more than a scum agenda.
Your Cephrir push is weak. His suspicions towards your slot make sense from a Town point-of-view. ...
BeautyAndTheBeast is likely town and needs to get over the push on someone else (Cephrir) who is likely Town.
Yeah that pinged for me too.
Not true. On her home site, most indies have town-friendly wincons. Ergo indies aren't necessarily scum.In post 515, Nero Cain wrote:just to help out Mollie 'cause technically 3rd party are still scum and even though it was pretty apparent that I was referring to the mafia in 510 but I wanted to make that crystal for her.
1) Except that's not what I said... so... good job?In post 531, Om the Destroyer wrote:1) ...no, it still applies. If your reads are even mostly based on who agrees with you or not, they still are horrible. It's like saying 1 or 2 good reads makes up for 10 bad reads, it makes no sense.
2) Provably incorrect:
...
So yes, you saying your list was largely based on whether or not people agreed with you was in response to Cephrir saying the same. Only the second half of said post talked about Slandaar and AA9 specifically.
~
No, I wasn't around to yell at her. I was a bit furious when I saw that she had moved our vote, though. She will receive many spankings for this.In post 635, Amethyst Kitty wrote:I'm going to bet Mollie and Jiffy are fighting on who their vote should be on
THIS is perpetuating RVS. He's voting someoneIn post 70, Cephrir wrote:I like the overconfident/hyperaggressive town mindset usually but this statement is just ridiculous. No one even knows if the game has started yet.In post 60, Thor665 wrote:Aw, look, a bad reaction test that ignores the current game state and a player who is functionally playing as neutral as a neutron.
Now I have three people I'm willing to lynch.
Vote: Thor
#tryinghardtolookliketownpostingIn post 85, Cephrir wrote:Well, you were claiming you were ready to lynch someone because they posted "/confirm" and nothing else at a point when it wasn't clear whether we were even supposed to be posting anything else. If the game had started it wouldn't be AS ridiculous, though I'd still take issue with you being ready to lynch on page 3 barring a really obvious tell.
>Doesn't know what to say when two townies are fighting, but feels a need to say SOMETHING because "look I'm participating in meaningful discussion!"In post 117, Cephrir wrote:Beauty and roflcopter are both incredibly silly.
>Shameless wagon hopIn post 219, Cephrir wrote:How is that role supposed to be anything but useless? We'd find out that information after Night 1 anyway. Not to mention you just outed yourself as not having any useful abilities for no reason?
If you were intending to claim before CTD suggested a massclaim, why didn't you do it during pregame?
I've only skimmed the last couple pages but for now,
Vote: Oversoul
This is a lot of words for an awful lot of nothing. Who does that? Oh yeah. Scum.In post 242, Cephrir wrote:Reads after actually reading intervening pages: Amethyst Kitty, DLG, rofl, Beauty for town. Ryu confuses me, want to see more. Scum vibes from fuzzy but I also thought he was scum in Amnesiac Mafia and he wasn't, so... eh. I don't know how I feel about Thor- the questioning/deliberately obtuse playstyle is kind of annoying but Beauty seems to suggest this is not out of the ordinary.
If there are indeed multiple killers in the game, massclaim could lose us a lot of PRs quickly. But it might also result in said killers killing each other more. Conflicted. I do think mods generally account for the possibility, and there were, after all, a million reviewers.
>Needed a reason to OMGUS.In post 324, Cephrir wrote:Wow, that's a ridiculously self-centered viewpoint. By that logic anyone who suspects you is scum.
Welcome to my scumlist.
>Shameless wagon hopIn post 327, Cephrir wrote:Good point. It's not like I actually want to lynch Oversoul.
Unvote, Vote: BeautyAndTheBeast
Possible scum slip that should be followed up on with investigative roles on Fenix if Cephrir flips scum.In post 438, Cephrir wrote:If you're implying meta, Fenix is a Goon and thus probably not aware of it.
>Preparing for shameless wagon hopIn post 629, Cephrir wrote:Guess I need to take another look at Nacho as I have him as null. Will do tomorrow.
He was suspicious of someone for confirming. You can't tell me that's not ridiculous.In post 638, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:THIS is perpetuating RVS. He's voting someoneIn post 70, Cephrir wrote:I like the overconfident/hyperaggressive town mindset usually but this statement is just ridiculous. No one even knows if the game has started yet.In post 60, Thor665 wrote:Aw, look, a bad reaction test that ignores the current game state and a player who is functionally playing as neutral as a neutron.
Now I have three people I'm willing to lynch.
Vote: Thorfor trying to get us out of RVS. "Wah! The game hasn't started yet! You can't start being serious! Wah!"
Scum.
Wow, what a shitty point. You could say that about anything that sounds like a townie post.B&B wrote:#tryinghardtolookliketownpostingIn post 85, Cephrir wrote:Well, you were claiming you were ready to lynch someone because they posted "/confirm" and nothing else at a point when it wasn't clear whether we were even supposed to be posting anything else. If the game had started it wouldn't be AS ridiculous, though I'd still take issue with you being ready to lynch on page 3 barring a really obvious tell.
Just my way of saying I thought the two of you were townvtowning...B&B wrote:>Doesn't know what to say when two townies are fighting, but feels a need to say SOMETHING because "look I'm participating in meaningful discussion!"In post 117, Cephrir wrote:Beauty and roflcopter are both incredibly silly.
Yes I'm obviously scum for changing my vote, that makes sense. I also spent this post detailing why I was about to vote Oversoul, it's not like I didn't have reasons.B&B wrote:>Shameless wagon hopIn post 219, Cephrir wrote:How is that role supposed to be anything but useless? We'd find out that information after Night 1 anyway. Not to mention you just outed yourself as not having any useful abilities for no reason?
If you were intending to claim before CTD suggested a massclaim, why didn't you do it during pregame?
I've only skimmed the last couple pages but for now,
Vote: OversoulNumber 1
I listed some town reads and an opinion about massclaim (leaning no). And it's not even that many words.B&B wrote:This is a lot of words for an awful lot of nothing. Who does that? Oh yeah. Scum.In post 242, Cephrir wrote:Reads after actually reading intervening pages: Amethyst Kitty, DLG, rofl, Beauty for town. Ryu confuses me, want to see more. Scum vibes from fuzzy but I also thought he was scum in Amnesiac Mafia and he wasn't, so... eh. I don't know how I feel about Thor- the questioning/deliberately obtuse playstyle is kind of annoying but Beauty seems to suggest this is not out of the ordinary.
If there are indeed multiple killers in the game, massclaim could lose us a lot of PRs quickly. But it might also result in said killers killing each other more. Conflicted. I do think mods generally account for the possibility, and there were, after all, a million reviewers.
Wow it turns out if you want to portray every action someone takes as scum, you *can*! It's not like your logic wasn't complete garbage, or like Om had just posted really good reasons to vote you as had I in my previous post....B&B wrote:>Needed a reason to OMGUS.In post 324, Cephrir wrote:Wow, that's a ridiculously self-centered viewpoint. By that logic anyone who suspects you is scum.
Welcome to my scumlist.
This wasn't even a wagon yet.Cephrir wrote:>Shameless wagon hopIn post 327, Cephrir wrote:Good point. It's not like I actually want to lynch Oversoul.
Unvote, Vote: BeautyAndTheBeastNumber 2
What the actual fuck are you talking about? His user title is Goon, as opposed to Mafia Scum, so he is new and doesn't know about meta.B&B wrote:Possible scum slip that should be followed up on with investigative roles on Fenix if Cephrir flips scum.In post 438, Cephrir wrote:If you're implying meta, Fenix is a Goon and thus probably not aware of it.
Way to suspect me for something I hadn't even done yet, and I have no intention of voting Nacho, I just want to try to see what everyone else is seeing. No, don't worry, my vote was never going to leave you for quite a while.B&B wrote:>Preparing for shameless wagon hopIn post 629, Cephrir wrote:Guess I need to take another look at Nacho as I have him as null. Will do tomorrow.Number 3
Wait... Om had good reasons to vote B&B?! I must have missed that...In post 639, Cephrir wrote:It's not like your logic wasn't complete garbage, or like Om had just posted really good reasons to vote you as had I in my previous post....
If you're town you should just stop playing this game. Uno might be more your speed.In post 639, Cephrir wrote: He was suspicious of someone for confirming. You can't tell me that's not ridiculous.
No. There's a distinct difference between "I am town" posting and "I am trying to look like I am town" posting.In post 639, Cephrir wrote: Wow, what a shitty point. You could say that about anything that sounds like a townie post.
Yes, that was exactly my point.In post 639, Cephrir wrote: Just my way of saying I thought the two of you were townvtowning...
Your reasons sucked. And I think a lot of them were a rehash of what others had already brought up. I can't be arsed to actually fact check this though.In post 639, Cephrir wrote: Yes I'm obviously scum for changing my vote, that makes sense. I also spent this post detailing why I was about to vote Oversoul, it's not like I didn't have reasons.
AK - No reason givenIn post 639, Cephrir wrote: I listed some town reads and an opinion about massclaim (leaning no). And it's not even that many words.
All of the aforementioned has been thoroughly refuted in prior posts.In post 639, Cephrir wrote: Wow it turns out if you want to portray every action someone takes as scum, you *can*! It's not like your logic wasn't complete garbage, or like Om had just posted really good reasons to vote you as had I in my previous post....
Someone else had already voted me and was actively pushing. This is a moot refutation to my point.In post 639, Cephrir wrote: This wasn't even a wagon yet.
Ah. Well disregard that, then. Doesn't really matter; that was more of a self-note than any kind of point against you.In post 639, Cephrir wrote: What the actual fuck are you talking about? His user title is Goon, as opposed to Mafia Scum, so he is new and doesn't know about meta.
"Oh god I got called out on it I better act like that was never my intention to switch to a more promising wagon!"In post 639, Cephrir wrote: Way to suspect me for something I hadn't even done yet, and I have no intention of voting Nacho, I just want to try to see what everyone else is seeing. No, don't worry, my vote was never going to leave you for quite a while.
^ Lynch this. Thanks!In post 639, Cephrir wrote: That was one of the most retarded cases I have ever responded to. Reach harder.
You should probably just vote Cephrir.In post 640, Bulbazak wrote:Wait... Om had good reasons to vote B&B?! I must have missed that...In post 639, Cephrir wrote:It's not like your logic wasn't complete garbage, or like Om had just posted really good reasons to vote you as had I in my previous post....
I like my vote where it is for now. Oversoul has pinged my scumdar harder than Cephrir, who is more in the null/scum range. I could get behind an Om wagon, though.In post 643, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:You should probably just vote Cephrir.In post 640, Bulbazak wrote:Wait... Om had good reasons to vote B&B?! I must have missed that...In post 639, Cephrir wrote:It's not like your logic wasn't complete garbage, or like Om had just posted really good reasons to vote you as had I in my previous post....
Thanks!
When your reasons for pushing me include not giving reasons for all my reads... yes, it'sIn post 645, Cephrir wrote:Oh, it's okay for you to withhold reasons for your town reads, but not me. Okay. That said I'll gladly provide reasons for all my reads up to this point fairly soon.
The only thing your back-and-forth with Om established was that you're an idiot, and you managed to refute approximately nothing.
Most of your other points consist mostly of "Nuh uh that wasn't what you were going to do" (a useless argument) and "You're trying to look town" (a teleological argument).