Why don't you just say SK here?In post 757, Nero Cain wrote:BTW guys, OM is a total 3rd party
This post seems odd given you jumped all over Mollie for calling you indie.
Why don't you just say SK here?In post 757, Nero Cain wrote:BTW guys, OM is a total 3rd party
but I wasn't calling him scum!!!In post 825, Oversoul wrote:Why don't you just say SK here?In post 757, Nero Cain wrote:BTW guys, OM is a total 3rd party
This post seems odd given you jumped all over Mollie for calling you indie.
The players?In post 824, Desperado wrote:Can you quote and comment on each of these?In post 820, Oversoul wrote:Hmm. Ok.In post 774, CrashTextDummie wrote:I will comment on other points of discussion tomorrow when I should have time to do more than skim thanks to the holiday, and I will likely move my vote to B&B, although Oversoul really should be voted to oblivion for persistently ignoring this question:
People have been asking about the case against him. It has been repeatedly pointed out what the scum motivation is behind a claim like his, and he has so far provided zero town motivation for doing it. I really struggle to think of any.In post 267, CrashTextDummie wrote:Why did you want to soft-claim pre MC-suggestion, Oversoul?
He is also guilty of soft-claiming, which in general is shady at best and a common scum tactic, and the appropriate course of action is to force a full claim.
I ignored it again because I wanted to see your reaction to me ignoring it and whether or not you would expand beyond just suspecting me.
My claim was a gambit. I am not an informed townie. I made that claim because I wanted to see the reactions and judge whether or not anyone would jump down my throat to get me lynched for it and so far only Nacho really committed that crime.
As to why I contradicted myself, I did because I legitimately wasn't thinking when I answered the first time. I kept being vague or outright not answering the question because I wanted more people to react to my claim andunfortunately only a handful of players did.
CTD's analysis of the mass claim tell looks very town motivated and the fact that he is moving forward with his scumreads when I figured he would sit by and wait for me to respond or try to further a case against me seems very town. I am happy to call him town in this game.
Yes, my Informed Townie claim was a gambit. I do not have any special information about the setup. My extra tid bit of "I have more information" was to further the gambit more until more people had commented on it.
You're gonna have to walk me through this one Nero because in a normal game, 3rd parties are always SKs. There is no middle ground on that.In post 826, Nero Cain wrote:but I wasn't calling him scum!!!In post 825, Oversoul wrote:Why don't you just say SK here?In post 757, Nero Cain wrote:BTW guys, OM is a total 3rd party
This post seems odd given you jumped all over Mollie for calling you indie.
completely legit! Not all 3rd parties are scum ya know?In post 828, Oversoul wrote:You're gonna have to walk me through this one Nero because in a normal game, 3rd parties are always SKs. There is no middle ground on that.In post 826, Nero Cain wrote:but I wasn't calling him scum!!!In post 825, Oversoul wrote:Why don't you just say SK here?In post 757, Nero Cain wrote:BTW guys, OM is a total 3rd party
This post seems odd given you jumped all over Mollie for calling you indie.
Were you trying to insult them or was this a legitimate call out?
I am a gullible person naturallyIn post 834, Nachomamma8 wrote:please stop letting nero troll you, jesus
It was funny I thought, maybe a bit annoying, idk. But I also wanted to hammer in the point that what Mollie did is fucking retarded since you two seem to think it wasn't.In post 835, Oversoul wrote:I am a gullible person naturallyIn post 834, Nachomamma8 wrote:please stop letting nero troll you, jesus
Bacde was actually the second vote on Nacho but still...In post 803, Nero Cain wrote:I'm pretty sure that Bcade was actually like the first to vote Nacho + while no scum tell is 100% the 3rd/4th votes are a slight scumtell.@Nero:
4/13 - I don't see it as a huge wagon. You are flipping out over stupid shit. You are trying to sling mud yet you don't call out Bacade for his 5th vote ON Nacho?
Whats this point that Mollie has made? All I see is Mollie yelling and screaming like an immature newbie.
I figured that he was lying, so I pushed him for it. The massclaim idea you might not like, but I don't really see how that makes me scum.In post 626, Amethyst Kitty wrote:Nacho is a read we both share, neither of us like the mass-claim and neither of us like his push on OS who we both think is probably town.
I've heard "massclaim, summary, OS is town". That's about it.In post 635, Amethyst Kitty wrote:though I have quite a fair amount of reason for Nacho-scum
I don't like the way he's responding so far, but I'm still waiting for the wheels to turn a little more before I give a solid read on him.In post 641, Amethyst Kitty wrote:Hey Nacho, thoughts on Cehprir?
You got me all excited when you said you were gonna provide reasoning later...In post 677, Bacde wrote:I'm actually down to lynch nacho
this feels like scum-nacho to me
(how was that as a contribution?)
It's also a good case to push as town, considering he was lying and it's a shitty gambit as town.In post 686, Bacde wrote:town-nacho would not have tunneled this idiotic OS case for this long
but its the perfect case for him to push as scum
Why?In post 688, Nero Cain wrote:pfft. Nacho badgering mover asking why Mollie called me an "indie" is just retarded and scummy. That's all that needs to be said.
Hey fuzzy, nice of you to join us? Where have you been?
Red Ryu! Why didn't you like my observations on Oversoul?In post 754, Red Ryu wrote:People should put more votes on Nacho.
Why did you think that anyone would jump down your throat to get you lynched for it?In post 820, Oversoul wrote:I made that claim because I wanted to see the reactions and judge whether or not anyone would jump down my throat to get me lynched for it and so far only Nacho really committed that crime.
B&tB did.
He was lying about there being 2 killing roles to make a believable story. The quote you are asking him to explain about is just fluff from the gambit while it was going on during early day 1.In post 823, Bulbazak wrote:Explain this:In post 820, Oversoul wrote:Yes, my Informed Townie claim was a gambit. I do not have any special information about the setup. My extra tid bit of "I have more information" was to further the gambit more until more people had commented on it.
In post 204, Oversoul wrote: There are at least *2* killing roles in this game.
People really just like wagoning me for whatever reason. I don't think I've ever gone through a game where people have not either wagoned me or suspected me for a long period of time.In post 841, Nachomamma8 wrote:Why did you think that anyone would jump down your throat to get you lynched for it?