Newbie 1371: Max Steel, Max Finished!

Majiffy · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 3:10 pm

I'll explain the postgame / dead QT.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 3:10 pm

Votecount 1.3:

Does Bo Know (1): ArcAngel9
anorway (1): freezing-hell
PHDScar (2): Majiffy, patzer
Majiffy (2): TMTOLBTWNTOF, anorway

Not Voting (3): PHDScar, Sakura Hana, Does Bo Know

freezing-hell is V/LA for (expired on 2013-05-12 12:00:00)

Majiffy · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 3:10 pm

Pretty sure PhD isn't self-voting, Nacho.

You're a sharp one.
~Nacho

Majiffy · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 3:12 pm

DBK who do you think could be scum if PhD were to flip town?

PhDScar · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 3:39 pm

In post 127, Majiffy wrote:Pretty sure PhD isn't self-voting, Nacho.

You're a sharp one.
~Nacho

He didn't say i was voting myself.

PhDScar · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 3:43 pm

In post 105, anorway wrote:Also, I'd like to see some more interaction from ArcAngel and Patzer. I'm going to ask this to both of you: who do you find suspicious and why?

I'm just going to point out quite a few players from this game have been extremely inactive. They have also yet to answer questions posed directly at them. I too would like to see their answers to the question above.

patzer · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 4:05 pm

In post 129, PhDScar wrote:
In post 127, Majiffy wrote:Pretty sure PhD isn't self-voting, Nacho.

You're a sharp one.
~Nacho
He didn't say i was voting myself.

that's because when the mod makes a mistake they tend to correct it. mods can edit.

PhDScar · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 4:07 pm

In post 131, patzer wrote:
In post 129, PhDScar wrote:
In post 127, Majiffy wrote:Pretty sure PhD isn't self-voting, Nacho.

You're a sharp one.
~Nacho
He didn't say i was voting myself.
that's because when the mod makes a mistake they tend to correct it. mods can edit.

Sorry my mistake. Thanks for catching that Majiffy.

patzer · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 4:18 pm

In post 115, PhDScar wrote:
In post 114, patzer wrote:
In post 31, PhDScar wrote:I think the "Lynching All Liars" could be safest thing to do. So i agree with that. I don't agree with "Lynching All Lurkers" because you never know what the reason is. Maybe they have computer issues or a real life emergency.

In post 53, PhDScar wrote:Okay I actually sort of agree with your opinion.
I wasn't saying that was my opinion
it was just how it seemed all the players in this were leaning.
These posts contradict each other.
at the moment PhD looks like the most likely scum.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: PhDScar
Sorry for the confusion all I was trying to say is that what he wrote was well written and made me rethink my opinion. Also it isn't very far how you those quotes out of context. So I ask anyone whom read this to go back to when I said the first quote and read up to last it should fill in some gaps.

Nope. you're lying. At least, in the underlined part you were lying. In Post 31, you wrote that you thought Lynch all Liars was good. In Post 48, you wrote that you thought that all the players were leaning that way.

Bo's counterargument was in post 51

. Before then no-one had tried to refute your lynch all liars suggestion. Therefore, in post 48, you must have still thought Lynch all Liars was best, since nobody had refuted it yet. Therefore your statement "I wasn't saying that was my opinion" was false.

patzer · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 4:20 pm

To elaborate, maybe you did agree with Bo's opinion after post 51, but Lynch all Liars had been your opinion before then.

PhDScar · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 4:38 pm

I'm not lying. Yes the “lynch all liars” was my opinion but I said everyone was leaning to lynch liars if it's that possible resort. Bo responded to the second and I said that wasn't my opinion and that that's true because I said let's just lynch people who lie no matter what. Also that's not my opinion anymore because I realize that's a shitty idea that would just help the scum more than us. Don’t you get what I’m trying to say?

Sakura Hana · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 4:40 pm

In post 117, PhDScar wrote:
Going to be honest I have hard time defending from this. Most of my answers to what Majiffy said are "noob screw ups". Also to the "also mentions he's ready to do a serious vote" bit, I wrote many times it had nothing to do with me thinking of any just me saying for me RVS is over.

So basically you admit about your scumslips but try to cover them as noobslips?

TMTOLBTWNTOF · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 5:25 pm

Unvote

At this stage, I'm inclined to believe PHD's mistakes are noob mistakes and not scum mistakes.

However, we'll see.

Majiffy · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 5:27 pm

TM, you were voting me, not PhD. Why unvote?

patzer · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 5:33 pm

In post 135, PhDScar wrote:I'm not lying. Yes the “lynch all liars” was my opinion but I said everyone was leaning to lynch liars if it's that possible resort. Bo responded to the second and I said that wasn't my opinion and that that's true because I said let's just lynch people who lie no matter what. Also that's not my opinion anymore because I realize that's a shitty idea that would just help the scum more than us. Don’t you get what I’m trying to say?

I know it's not your opinion any more, but I was trying to expose your lie earlier.
So you are saying that Bo was asking you whether you you supported lynching liars (as a last resort) and you said no because you supported lynching liars under all circumstances. even though that's technically true I can't imagine anyone saying that, because it was quite obvious what bo meant.

Also, I don't like how you've been trying to change the subject a lot.

PhDScar · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 5:37 pm

How have i been trying to change the subject.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 5:53 pm

After re-reading patzer's post 133 (how did i miss it in the first place? X_X) yeah this kinda looks odd to me
VOTE: PhD
Maybe additional pressure will help

PhDScar · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 5:57 pm

In post 141, Sakura Hana wrote:After re-reading patzer's post 133 (how did i miss it in the first place? X_X) yeah this kinda looks odd to me
VOTE: PhD
Maybe additional pressure will help

Additional pressure will help what exactly?

PhDScar · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 6:05 pm

Man it sure is a funny coincidence how Sakura always shows up for the wagons then disappears when they are over... I'm sure it's nothing though

Sakura Hana · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 6:07 pm

In post 142, PhDScar wrote:
In post 141, Sakura Hana wrote:After re-reading patzer's post 133 (how did i miss it in the first place? X_X) yeah this kinda looks odd to me
VOTE: PhD
Maybe additional pressure will help
Additional pressure will help what exactly?

Telling you would spoil the fun

Majiffy · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 12:20 am

That's L-2, so no more votes on PhD until everyone has had time to check in and give their thoughts on the matter.

PhDScar · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 3:04 am

In post 144, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 142, PhDScar wrote:
In post 141, Sakura Hana wrote:After re-reading patzer's post 133 (how did i miss it in the first place? X_X) yeah this kinda looks odd to me
VOTE: PhD
Maybe additional pressure will help
Additional pressure will help what exactly?
Telling you would spoil the fun

That doesn't sound scummy in the slightest.

Does Bo Know · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 4:31 am

In post 128, Majiffy wrote:DBK who do you think could be scum if PhD were to flip town?

Patzer.

I promise I'll catch up more later today. I have to run a lot of errands and I'll be busy tonight. Sunday though, I'm catching up in all my games.

Majiffy · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 4:36 am

Let me know when you're available.

PhDScar · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 5:11 am

Sakura has been acting scummy with her vote hopping on and off my wagon. DBK voted me and right after she did.

In post 77, Sakura Hana wrote: VOTE: PhD
I feel an L-2 situation might yield more answers.

DBK unvotes

With that I UNVOTE:

And guess what? Sakura unvoted as well.

I joined the wagon thinking it was to gauge reactions, but it seems I was wrong, so i rather wait for a reason from Majiffy before i decide whether i buy his read on you or not, so for the time being
UNVOTE:

She doesn’t give reasoning for her votes, just claims to be "looking for answers".

In post 144, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 142, PhDScar wrote:
In post 141, Sakura Hana wrote:After re-reading patzer's post 133 (how did i miss it in the first place? X_X) yeah this kinda looks odd to me
VOTE: PhD
Maybe additional pressure will help
Additional pressure will help what exactly?
Telling you would spoil the fun

Her eagerness to sheep onto wagons is scummy enough, and her reasons for voting are barely there.
Also sorry if these quotes don’t turn out in the proper format I don’t understand how it works.