1) What? I don't understand your first two lines.In post 1198, Svenskt Stål wrote:The diffrence my friend is in knowledge. Grouping them as "scum" takes away the element of them knowing eachothers alignments.In post 1195, Desperado wrote:I said best case scenarioIn post 1187, Svenskt Stål wrote:Explain how the kill is bussing Krabs?
And who is genuinely scumhunting?
Krab and gcbc are not both scum, thats a known fact. This is the problem with viewing all "anti town factions" as group "scum". They can both be anti town, there is a big diffrence.GCBC was bussing Krab, as in Krab is also on aligned with Heyman. Alternatively, GCBC was genuinely scumhunting and caught Shield-aligned Krab.
And there is no functional difference. They are not aligned with the town, so they are scum. My role PM says that all threats to the town must be eliminated. It does not differentiate between threats, therefore anyone who is not aligned with me is scum. It is not a "known fact" that they are not both scum.
It is a known fact that they are not scum because gcbc was not scum.
So in your mind krab is either heyman or shield? You have way to much confidence in your reads bro.
GCBC probably just tried to blend in and push people.
2) "You have way too much confidence in your reads bro," says the guy whose only reason for not voting Krab was because he sees scum all over his wagon.
3) Or he was scumhunting to look town and not get lynched. How is executing a fake dayvig gambit "blending in?"