WWE Believe in the Shield

RATEDR · Post Post #1225 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:04 am

lol this blows

Desperado · Post Post #1226 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:05 am

Sven you are just all over the place. "You don't know if Krabs is good or bad, stop acting like it...AND EVEN IF HE (KRAB) WAS (MY NUMBER ONE SCUMSPECT) I WOULD NOT HAVE VOTED HIM WITH THAT WAGON." So I can't have confidence in my scum read, but you can be so confident in your reads of the Krab wagoneers that you refuse to vote him.

"No I am saying that GCBC was TRYING TO BLEND IN" jesus christ. I know what you said. I am

asking you to explain how executing a fake dayvig gambit is an example of GCBC trying to blend in.

Not only did it not blend him in, it got a wagon started on him. It had the exact opposite of the effect that he would have intended if what you are saying is true.

Svenskt Stål · Post Post #1227 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:08 am

I am done with you for now desp

Svenskt Stål · Post Post #1228 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:10 am

In post 1215, RATEDR wrote:Is it possible for us to lynch Doctor C

In post 1216, RATEDR wrote:Like right now

In post 1217, ferretlover wrote:Why??

In post 1219, RATEDR wrote:He's scum

In post 1220, ferretlover wrote:How do you know?

In post 1222, RATEDR wrote:
In post 1220, ferretlover wrote:How do you know?
I haven't been paying that much attention to the thread but I think he's a better lynch than most of the wagons up right now

In post 1223, Svenskt Stål wrote:Lol.

Yeah I have alot of people i wanna lynch

RATED, FUZZY, MALCOLM

^first tier suspects.

In post 1224, RATEDR wrote:Why are those people your suspect

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Rated.

Desperado · Post Post #1229 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:11 am

In post 1227, Svenskt Stål wrote:I am done with you for now desp

Why? Because you can't answer the question?

RATEDR · Post Post #1230 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:11 am

Svenskt Stål wrote:
In post 1215, RATEDR wrote:Is it possible for us to lynch Doctor C

In post 1216, RATEDR wrote:Like right now

In post 1217, ferretlover wrote:Why??

In post 1219, RATEDR wrote:He's scum

In post 1220, ferretlover wrote:How do you know?

In post 1222, RATEDR wrote:
In post 1220, ferretlover wrote:How do you know?
I haven't been paying that much attention to the thread but I think he's a better lynch than most of the wagons up right now

In post 1223, Svenskt Stål wrote:Lol.

Yeah I have alot of people i wanna lynch

RATED, FUZZY, MALCOLM

^first tier suspects.

In post 1224, RATEDR wrote:Why are those people your suspect
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Rated.

Man you're an asshole

RATEDR · Post Post #1231 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:12 am

Seriously though I have not read the last 40 pages of this thread

ferretlover · Post Post #1232 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:14 am

RATEDR and xMALCOMx have already been explained. Not sure about fuzzy, however.

I agree I would be fine with an xMALCOMx or RATEDR lynch today.

Nero Cain · Post Post #1233 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:25 am

no, we should be lynching Goat or Despo.

ferretlover · Post Post #1234 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:29 am

Ummm... RATEDR just TOLD us that he hasn't read the thread. Scummy? Yes. Sven's case? Yes. Let's lynch RATEDR. Noone else sees the scumminness of xMALCOMx...

VOTE: RATEDR

RATEDR · Post Post #1235 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:32 am

Since when is not reading the thread a scumtell

Desperado · Post Post #1236 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:35 am

In post 1234, ferretlover wrote:Ummm... RATEDR just TOLD us that he hasn't read the thread. Scummy? Yes. Sven's case? Yes. Let's lynch RATEDR.
Noone else sees the scumminness of xMALCOMx...

VOTE: RATEDR

Malcolm had 6 votes (same as Mutley now that GCBC is dead) before you unvoted.

RATEDR · Post Post #1237 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:36 am

In post 1155, Svenskt Stål wrote:This heyman fella, is this someone who could have like a 3 man team or something? Would that fit within the wrastlin lore?

Or do we have free roamers

Paul Heyman is totally working with Brock Lesnar and CM Punk.. Maybe Brad Maddox too...? Hmm, maybe. CM Punk and Brock Lesnar are badass as fuck (as well as The Shield) so we're dealing with 5 enemies left, minimum.

In post 1178, Svenskt Stål wrote:Okay so theory time.

Why scum killed GCBC.

Yes this is a reach.

Not at all a reach, I hate to speculate flavor, but I will do so anyways.

One of the big defining things about The Shield is that they come out of nowhere (through the crowd, sometimes after lights turn off ala Undertaker) to attack someone. It is very possible that The Shield has a 1-shot day-vig as long as they're united. Or better yet, perhaps the flavor is that they can't do their kill at night, and must do it at day.

That said, it doesn't explain why they'd get GoodCopBadCop, which was kind of obvious Mafia from the beginning, so I guess maybe it was a vig from Town and the flavor is just that The Shield kills everyone in this game...? Sorry, flavor-speculation, I'm just interested in it, I can't wait for the OP to reveal the roles at the end.

In post 1234, ferretlover wrote:Ummm... RATEDR just TOLD us that he hasn't read the thread. Scummy? Yes. Sven's case? Yes. Let's lynch RATEDR. Noone else sees the scumminness of xMALCOMx...

VOTE: RATEDR

This is a stupid, stupid vote with a stupid, STUPID reason. Vifam may have not been reading the thread, but I have, and I have been posting stuff. Also, not bothering to read the thread is not a scum-tell, its more of a town-tell than a scum-tell, for that matter, although I'd place it solidly at null.

-Grazie

Desperado · Post Post #1238 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:37 am

Also: "Sven's case? Yes." hahahah what case? "Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Rated" is not a case. It's barely even analysis. He just quoted a bunch of posts and said "Here, look!"

RATEDR · Post Post #1239 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:37 am

In post 1236, Desperado wrote:
In post 1234, ferretlover wrote:Ummm... RATEDR just TOLD us that he hasn't read the thread. Scummy? Yes. Sven's case? Yes. Let's lynch RATEDR.
Noone else sees the scumminness of xMALCOMx...

VOTE: RATEDR

Malcolm had 6 votes (same as Mutley now that GCBC is dead) before you unvoted.

Heya, pal, are you Rondar?

-Grazie

RATEDR · Post Post #1240 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:38 am

In post 1238, Desperado wrote:Also: "Sven's case? Yes." hahahah what case? "Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Rated" is not a case. It's barely even analysis. He just quoted a bunch of posts and said "Here, look!"

Sven is being a bit of a dick, IMO, but I don't really blame him for being frustrated with the game. I still think he's Town and if he's faking it, well, damn...

-Grazie

Nero Cain · Post Post #1241 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:38 am

In post 1145, petapan wrote:
In post 1144, Desperado wrote:
In post 1137, petapan wrote:desperado is slightly above scum on my list i think because he asked for a claim from sven after the fake dayvig which is scumshit but i haven't noticed anything otherwise
No I didn't. I was asking GoodCopBadCop to claim. Sven wasn't even present IIRC
oh i'm an idiot i just reread that ok read rescinded

I don't really understand this part.

Why would you think it was scummy of Despo to ask Sven to claim?

Why is he no longer scummy for asking GCBC to claim after the fake daykill?

Desperado · Post Post #1242 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:40 am

In post 1240, RATEDR wrote:
In post 1238, Desperado wrote:Also: "Sven's case? Yes." hahahah what case? "Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Rated" is not a case. It's barely even analysis. He just quoted a bunch of posts and said "Here, look!"
Sven is being a bit of a dick, IMO, but I don't really blame him for being frustrated with the game. I still think he's Town and if he's faking it, well, damn...

-Grazie

I wasn't making a judgement on Sven. Sven didn't present it as a case, ferret mistakenly called it one so I was correcting him. I doubt Sven intended that to be the be all end all of his read on you.

And no, I'm not Rondar. Rondar is currently noshowing an ongoing game that I am currently in, if you care to look for it.

RATEDR · Post Post #1243 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:41 am

I think sven wasn't trying to make a case when he quoted those things, I just think he was being a jerk and calling us bad players who don't give effort and shit.

-Grazie

Nero Cain · Post Post #1244 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:43 am

In post 1235, RATEDR wrote:Since when is not reading the thread a scumtell

Well its not exactly pro-town to not read and give thoughts and scum do lurk all the time...

Desperado · Post Post #1245 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:43 am

In post 1241, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1145, petapan wrote:
In post 1144, Desperado wrote:
In post 1137, petapan wrote:desperado is slightly above scum on my list i think because he asked for a claim from sven after the fake dayvig which is scumshit but i haven't noticed anything otherwise
No I didn't. I was asking GoodCopBadCop to claim. Sven wasn't even present IIRC
oh i'm an idiot i just reread that ok read rescinded
I don't really understand this part.

Why would you think it was scummy of Despo to ask Sven to claim?

Why is he no longer scummy for asking GCBC to claim after the fake daykill?

Unless I'm mistaken you're the only one who thinks this. You've made no effort to engage me in a discussion about it, despite multiple efforts on my part, choosing instead to just keep parroting it as if the matter is already settled...to the point where I'm beginning to think it's just not worth mentioning anymore. If you aren't going to make a good faith effort, then why should I?

RATEDR · Post Post #1246 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:44 am

In post 1244, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1235, RATEDR wrote:Since when is not reading the thread a scumtell
Well its not exactly pro-town to not read and give thoughts and scum do lurk all the time...

I guess but pro town =/= not scum scum can be active give thoughts and reads and all that junk

Nero Cain · Post Post #1247 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:46 am

In post 1245, Desperado wrote:
In post 1241, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1145, petapan wrote:
In post 1144, Desperado wrote:
In post 1137, petapan wrote:desperado is slightly above scum on my list i think because he asked for a claim from sven after the fake dayvig which is scumshit but i haven't noticed anything otherwise
No I didn't. I was asking GoodCopBadCop to claim. Sven wasn't even present IIRC
oh i'm an idiot i just reread that ok read rescinded
I don't really understand this part.

Why would you think it was scummy of Despo to ask Sven to claim?

Why is he no longer scummy for asking GCBC to claim after the fake daykill?
Unless I'm mistaken you're the only one who thinks this. You've made no effort to engage me in a discussion about it, despite multiple efforts on my part, choosing instead to just keep parroting it as if the matter is already settled...to the point where I'm beginning to think it's just not worth mentioning anymore. If you aren't going to make a good faith effort, then why should I?

I'm obviously asking Petapan a question and I don't get why you are butting in said discussion.

ferretlover · Post Post #1248 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:47 am

In post 1235, RATEDR wrote:Since when is not reading the thread a scumtell

Since I said it was.

RATEDR · Post Post #1249 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:49 am

In post 1248, ferretlover wrote:
In post 1235, RATEDR wrote:Since when is not reading the thread a scumtell
Since I said it was.

...

unvote

ferretlove

-Grazie