Open 493 - Jungle Republic. (Game Over - Werewolf Victory)

Bacde · Post Post #975 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 10:00 am

In post 965, goodmorning wrote:Town wouldn't typically get into semantic arguments amongst themselves

why

Syryana · Post Post #976 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 10:01 am

In post 974, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 973, Syryana wrote: Who ARE your other scumreads?
Autti and Mac. Still trying to figure out what I think about TNE and Bo, as they are both nulls.

Autti I get. Why Mac?

Does Bo Know · Post Post #977 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 10:03 am

In post 975, Bacde wrote:
In post 965, goodmorning wrote:Town wouldn't typically get into semantic arguments amongst themselves
why

This.

I see town vs. town arguments like that all the time.

Bacde · Post Post #978 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 10:47 am

In post 977, Does Bo Know wrote:
In post 975, Bacde wrote:
In post 965, goodmorning wrote:Town wouldn't typically get into semantic arguments amongst themselves
why
This.

I see town vs. town arguments like that all the time.

shush don't ruin the scumhunt

@goodmorning, why would town not get in a semantics argument?

Bacde · Post Post #979 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 10:48 am

In post 976, Syryana wrote:
In post 974, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 973, Syryana wrote: Who ARE your other scumreads?
Autti and Mac. Still trying to figure out what I think about TNE and Bo, as they are both nulls.
Autti I get. Why Mac?

everyone scumreads mac when they first play with him (I did it too)

but I'm pretty sure he's town

thenewearth · Post Post #980 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 12:52 pm

Well bacde when we both read him as scum, he was actually scum

goodmorning · Post Post #981 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 1:11 pm

In post 975, Bacde wrote:
In post 965, goodmorning wrote:Town wouldn't typically get into semantic arguments amongst themselves
why

Because semantic arguments aren't real. They're just a distraction and they don't really benefit anyone (except perhaps scum who want an "appearance's sake" argument "win" or scum who want to clog the thread with distracting shit like "let's define these words").

In post 977, Does Bo Know wrote:I see town vs. town arguments like that all the time.

I don't.

In post 978, Bacde wrote:@goodmorning, why would town not get in a semantics argument?

Why ask twice?

Bulbazak · Post Post #982 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 1:44 pm

In post 976, Syryana wrote:Why Mac?

1.)

In post 40, Mac wrote:
In post 2, Syryana wrote:VOTE: Mac
For having the shortest name on the playerlist.
What about Egg? Same amount of letters AND first alphabetically.

This feels like scum who is reacting to being caught for the wrong reasons.

2.)

In post 61, Mac wrote: So... do these guys look like scum partners or what?

Already explained why this was bad. He's seeking the town's approval on a scum read. A town player would have been more assertive. Mac is implying that there is scumminess in the interactions, but he has to make sure that it is okay for him to proceed, since he doesn't want to put himself out there too much.

3.) His later vote on me is pure OMGUS, and again feels like caught scum.

4.) Bacde says Mac is town because of Mac agreeing with him and figuring out the Klick case first. However, it just as easily could be Mac buddying Bacde and trying to paint Klick as scummy, which I believe is the case.

Mac · Post Post #983 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:57 pm

A fucking RVS post? REALLY? I'll respond to the rest when I return but including an RVS post means it doesn't look good. Why on EARTH would I panic about a vote

that didn't even count?

@mod - V/LA for the weekend

Syryana · Post Post #984 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 3:52 am

@mod, I'll be V/LA until Wednesday.

Bulbazak · Post Post #985 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 6:32 am

In post 983, Mac wrote:A fucking RVS post? REALLY? I'll respond to the rest when I return but including an RVS post means it doesn't look good. Why on EARTH would I panic about a vote
that didn't even count?

The scummy part was you trying to shift attention off of yourself and onto Egg ("Why did you vote me and not Egg?"). Fuzzy was caught in RVS, why can't you be?

Bacde · Post Post #986 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 6:54 am

In post 980, thenewearth wrote:Well bacde when we both read him as scum, he was actually scum

yeah thats true

but my first game w/ mac he was town but I still thought he was scum

Bacde · Post Post #987 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 6:57 am

In post 981, goodmorning wrote:Because semantic arguments aren't real. They're just a distraction and they don't really benefit anyone (except perhaps scum who want an "appearance's sake" argument "win" or scum who want to clog the thread with distracting shit like "let's define these words").

sorry, this is just wrong

semantics arguments are real

and town v town semantics arguments happen all the time

Bacde · Post Post #988 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 6:57 am

In post 985, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 983, Mac wrote:A fucking RVS post? REALLY? I'll respond to the rest when I return but including an RVS post means it doesn't look good. Why on EARTH would I panic about a vote
that didn't even count?

The scummy part was you trying to shift attention off of yourself and onto Egg ("Why did you vote me and not Egg?"). Fuzzy was caught in RVS, why can't you be?

link to fuzzy being caught during rvs plz

i want to see the post and the post catching him

Bacde · Post Post #989 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 6:58 am

@Klick do you have any games of you getting super exciting about a "slip" that ended up not being a slip? (where you were town)

Bacde · Post Post #990 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 6:59 am

btw I refuse to even consider lynching mac as long as he is my strongest supporter in lynching my strongest scumread

Bulbazak · Post Post #991 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 7:55 am

In post 988, Bacde wrote: link to fuzzy being caught during rvs plz

i want to see the post and the post catching him

In post 47, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 46, Bulbazak wrote:For the record, 1337 is why Fuzzy will be caught in 3 pages if scum.
You do realize I just won a game as scum, when my partner was lynched early game, right?

I'm not as bad as scum as you think I am.

In post 57, Icebox wrote:Similarly, why did Fuzzy get defensive about it? Being easily recognizable as scum shouldn't be a problem for him if he were town, it's actually advantageous for town him.

-Rem

In post 59, fuzzybutternut wrote:Where did I get defensive, Ice?

Bacde · Post Post #992 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 8:51 am

dude I just want klick lynched

maybe Mac figured it all out and was bussing klick is partner, but thats not what I'm seeing

klick hopped on a nonexistent slip to try to get icebox mislynched, thats all there is to it

and klick has no evidence of games where he misidentified a slip and still pushed on it to the extreme he did this game

Klick · Post Post #993 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 9:03 am

Okay, I really don't care enough about this right now to search through my meta and show where I've been for killing slips. I'll do it later, but if you really care, you can look yourself until I do.

Meanwhile, you still didn't respond to the post where I said you were lying about trying to reaction-test me.

zabriel · Post Post #994 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 11:39 am

Mac and Syr are V/LA. You guys haven't voted since my last votecount. In other news, Neverwinter is pretty fun. And Autti has been prodded.

Bacde · Post Post #995 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 1:33 pm

oh I didn't see that but I wasn't lying

I wasn't reaction testing specifically you, but you are the one I remember going for it

Mac · Post Post #996 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 11:42 pm

In post 985, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 983, Mac wrote:A fucking RVS post? REALLY? I'll respond to the rest when I return but including an RVS post means it doesn't look good. Why on EARTH would I panic about a vote
that didn't even count?

The scummy part was you trying to shift attention off of yourself and onto Egg ("Why did you vote me and not Egg?"). Fuzzy was caught in RVS, why can't you be?

1) there was no attention
2) whats the difference between that and you saying you are not town in rvs? LOLSCUM

Mac · Post Post #997 (ISO) » Sat May 11, 2013 11:43 pm

In post 986, Bacde wrote:
In post 980, thenewearth wrote:Well bacde when we both read him as scum, he was actually scum
yeah thats true

but my first game w/ mac he was town but I still thought he was scum

Yeah im pretty shit at that. Then again i had a pr then.

Egg · Post Post #998 (ISO) » Sun May 12, 2013 2:21 am

Guys I'll catch up tomorrow. I've been trying to at least skim, but I'm not getting very far with that.

Bulbazak · Post Post #999 (ISO) » Sun May 12, 2013 5:20 am

In post 996, Mac wrote: 2) whats the difference between that and you saying you are not town in rvs? LOLSCUM

What you said was serious. You asked Syryana why he was voting you and not Egg, showing that you cared more about his RVS vote than he did. Again, it feels like scum who got caught for the wrong, or in this case a stupid, reason.

Also, nice deflection by trying to bring in my RQS answer. The two are not even close to being similar. As I've said, your post is closer to Fuzzy's reaction in RVS to me saying he'd be easy to find as scum, rather than to me having fun with an RQS question and stating that I'm a monkey. Ook.