The fact that you've seen me use this kind of analysis as town before might clue you in that I'm not "playing off" anything. But really I don't give a damn what you think on this matter and I'm not going to discuss the merits of it with you. It served its purpose in that it gave me information I find valuable and that has helped me find scum in the past and it's the closest I've gotten to actually make a D1 massclaim happen. Do with it what you will.In post 1014, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:So how can I know that your "reaction test" wasn't just a failed scum gambit that you're now trying to play off in a town way? Your reads certainly sucked and lacked a level of depth, and you've cleverly avoided commenting on something like half the game.In post 959, CrashTextDummie wrote:No, it doesn't. I have never seen scum support massclaim when I've suggested it as town. We've already established that scum are capable of suggesting massclaim.BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:Does this include scum being the initial voice for the idea? Because if so, look at Aunt Jemina in YCBA Probably at least one other scum on that team also supported the idea.
If there's anything specific you want me to comment on, ask.
-----------------
Nacho's lack of posting is a problem. It severely diminishes the information to be gleaned from his wagon if he flips town. It also weakens my town-read on him somewhat. Does Nacho lurk as scum? Does he avoid posting when under pressure? Show me this and I will reconsider my stance on him.
----------------
How did you determine whether he was scum fake-claiming or town fake-claiming? Why do you think it's scummy to attack a fake-claim?AmethystKitty wrote:OS, I didn't comment on your Gambit because I thought it wasn't helpful. I though it was an obvious fake-claim and that it was obvious that you were looking for how people would react, one of the reasons why I believe Nacho to be scum is because of how he reacted.
---------------
I'd like to hear more thoughts on DLG, my case against him was severely overlooked.