In post 20278, xRECKONERx wrote: In post 20275, TehBrawlGuy wrote: In post 20270, xRECKONERx wrote: In post 20268, TehBrawlGuy wrote:Oh hey, I'm third seed. That's nifty. It's kind of lame that I'm going to get a worse team if I win, though, since captains can't draft captains. (and if they can then gg captain team)
That's the idea
ik, but it's still lame for the prize of this tournament to be a kick in the sack. I'd have just random.org'd 4 captains and had them pick starting with the lowest seed.
Still, the 1v1s will be fun.
I mean this is all for fun and what you're saying is that you wish we'd random'd captains so the four best players had a chance to end up on the same overpowered team
Like I said, it'll still be fun, it's just bleh that the prize for winning is less chance at winning the 5v5s.
idk how you got that there'd be any chance of the best players being on the same team. Worst case scenario, you random seeds 2, 3, 4, 5 as captains, and then the 5th seed first picks seed #1. It's basically going to happen like that with the 1v1 tourney anyway. The higher seeds will win and then draft the high seeds who were upset. Heck, with how it is now, if Ank gets beaten out and Fate wins it all, you end with the top two seeds on the same team.
In post 20279, RayFrost wrote:Also, four best 1v1 players is not equal to four bet players overall. 1v1 is completely different from 5v5 - it's practically a different game
All the more reason using 5v5s to seed 1v1s to draft for 5v5s (yes, you heard that right) is only going to end up with imbalance. If two people from seeds 1-4 are in the finals and the other two don't make captain, then your 4 best 5s players will be on two teams.
Even with imbalanced teams it'll still be a great time, but the funnest games are the close ones.
I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.