Okay, when I first said Patzer would be scum, I wasn’t looking at much past opportunism in his
114. He just pointed out two posts and said PhD was most likely scum.
So, elaborating more on Majiffy’s
116:
- I actually don’t see anything scummy in
24. Yes, I do like PhDScar’s taste in media and whatnot, but that doesn’t look like buddying. If he does something that could possibly resemble buddying later, I’ll consider it.
-
27 could be played off as a joke, similarly to the reasons for not RVS voting Majiffy and I.
-
29: Eh, maybe.
- Intermission: At this point I’ll probably be Majiffy’s next target tomorrow if PhDScar is lynched today and flips town, considering I’ve “buddied” PhDScar simply through my
30? Which is in fact where 31 and 32 came from?
-
48 looks like a decent point.
- The points on posts 49 and 50 is dumb. I feel like PhD would’ve reacted in 49 or 50 instead of later in
66 if he were scum.
- Had to read post 66 again though, and at first I didn’t draw attention to the end of the post. That does look fairly suspicious…
-
It’s at this point I actually consider PhDScar could be scum. Before this Majiffy had some points but not enough for me to vote.
-
78 and
82 are both scum posts. The fact he was planning for a serious vote and didn’t give one…hm…
Okay, now after Majiffy’s case:
117 is typical “I’m a newbie” defense, and could be considered cautiousness in voting someone for weak reasons.
133 looks like genuine logic, but I do actually understand what PhDScar was trying to say, so I don’t see that as a scum tell.
139: I don’t see PhD changing the subject…
143: Oh man, PhD here trying to put some suspicion on Sakura without acting on it. (Although I do agree, doesn’t mean PhD is in the clear.)
I’m still trying to get a decent read on PhD after this post but it’s tough.
145 is Majiffy’s town play. Majiffy is normally known for pushing wagons to oblivion, but I’ve seen a little more reluctance from his town play than his scum play.
149 could be a newbie attempt at scumhunting but I still have a while to go apparently.
I agree with
153, note to self that Sakura is my top scumread at this point.
156: Maybe he thinks stating reads on everyone will make him look townie since a player before him did it?
162: My goodness this guy is playing the newb card or the scum card here. I'm leaning toward fairly scummy card.
171: Unvote doesn't make any sense in itself but also isn't scum-Majiffy.
174 is completely contradictory with
156. In 156 PhD says Majiffy's motives and actions are town, and when he pulls the case apart in 174, he shoots down everything as if it wasn't true. But a lot of these responses seem newbtown...nope nope NOPE NOPE nope I don't like the newb card anymore. Not in the slightest. Newbscum using newb excuses to defend, after originally stating in some other post that he said he could defend Majiffy's 116. PhDScar and Sakura are both good votes for me at this point.
178: Majiffy agrees with me, nice.
181: Terrible vote on TMT. We can't double-vote in this new setup, huh?
185: OH MY GOD SUCH A BAD UNVOTE. And thinking Majiffy changing his mind is scummy.
192: freezing-hell comes back in with an L-2 vote. Opportunism? We'll see, haven't finished reading yet.
197: Just the
way
that's posted ("I meant you're the first scum") sounds like a townie response, or something a townie would say if they suspected someone.
198 is worried about joking so that it'll blow up in his face,
199 looks like townie posting some more yay.
If there's anything anyone would like me to comment on, I'll try my best, but normally when I catch up, I don't elaborate on every single detail with every single opinion. My summer's started though, so I should be a lot more active throughout the day now. (Well, Monday I'll be gone because I'm getting a ton of errands done.)
Current reads (no particular order):
Majiffy
Patzer
Freezing-hell
TMTOLBTWNTOF
Sakura Hana
PhDScar
ArcAngel
anorway
Usually I have Null and Neutral in my reads; Null means they haven't posted enough content for me to have an opinion. Neutral means they've posted enough to deserve a read of some sort, but that I can't classify them leaning either way.
