Just chill for a minute.
No need to get angry.
If you feel your play is wrong, change it.
If you feel we are being unjust, that's part of the game.
Get the fuck out of my mafia.In post 25, thenewearth wrote:DBZ too old. Plus too exaggerated
We're bad people, Fuzzy, dragging people into games unwittingly.In post 33, Hamlet wrote: I still find it funny that Belisarius knows nothing of this right now.
I love you, marry me, and have my children.In post 60, chkflip wrote:
You can be town for now.In post 76, PimHel wrote:In post 69, TheIrishPope wrote:Hmmm... Bacde is pretty fishy, but whatevs.
VOTE: sword_of_omens
For criticizing our awesomenessUnvote; Vote:Pope
Micros are typically 2 scum, since it's a 9p game.
Yeah, I officially haveIn post 84, TheIrishPope wrote:Right, right, the only thing is assumptions don't work here, kid. There might be a cult for all we know.
I was SK in a game that also had a cult. It was a trial run for mainstream's large theme.In post 90, Ghostlin wrote:Now, if you link me to a chk game, particularly a mini, where he used a Cult or a single SK as the antagonist, I would gladly redact my assumption of two scum.
Oh god me too.In post 100, Bacde wrote:well I'm glad p4 is over
No they don't. He was trying to push someone as scum for assuming normal in a game that isn't advertised as bastard. And then he rebuked the arguments with "yeah well you couldn't possibly know 100% i mean that's just like scientific FACT!"*, and a slew of other speculative, absolutely useless outguess-the-mod garbage.In post 106, Bacde wrote:his more recent posts look better though
Guuuurl this isIn post 108, fferyllt wrote:agree.In post 106, Bacde wrote:his more recent posts look better though
In post 114, thenewearth wrote:Guys this is a chk game. So don't assume scum numbers.
...
About the number of scum. 9p game. I think I would also say 2 scums.
You continue to do things that make me like you. Keep it up.
In post 132, PimHel wrote:I voted you, because your big post seems fake. I don't get the feeling that you are actually suspicious of either of them when I read your post.
If I ever get a glimmer of town read from you guys, I might.In post 287, Vegito wrote:Guuuurl this is my turf. We do things a bit differently here. Sheep the Jiffy. Love the Jiffy.
Why.
It isn't that you didn't vote someone you had suspicion for, it's that you voted someone youIn post 158, TheIrishPope wrote:D-d-d-d-d-d-double post
No one would quickhammer because they know it would look scummy SUSPICION =/= YOU HAVE TO VOTE. Show me the rule. I don't understand why you center on that, and WHY IT IS SCUMMY IN ANY WAY.
#caughtscumIn post 161, TheIrishPope wrote:RVS, HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF IT
AT THIS STAGE SUSPICIONS DON'T MATTER BECAUSE IT'S ALL INSTINCT
I'm not one to shout, sorry.
One does not simply have a scum read and vote a null read.In post 174, Hamlet wrote:I'm really not seeing the problem with being suspicious of one player and voting another; I think it's called "not tunnelling."
<3 Hi townbacde.In post 176, Bacde wrote:this post is fake can we lynch this guy plzkthxIn post 161, TheIrishPope wrote:RVS, HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF IT
AT THIS STAGE SUSPICIONS DON'T MATTER BECAUSE IT'S ALL INSTINCT
I'm not one to shout, sorry.
#townposting
They're both fantastic options, actually.In post 247, PimHel wrote:This is a bad wagon. I'll get to it tomorrow why Dr P is a better option.
Nvm.
I'd say start drinking but the liquor store is closed and I'd hate for you to drink alone.In post 297, fferyllt wrote:If you come back and say that you're now leaning town on omen it may drive me to drink