That's just wrong. A waggon on scum usually goes slow whilst a waggon on town goes faster in comparison.In post 551, hapahauli wrote:hp[leaves], so what? I know there wasn't much resistance to the AC wagon. That's generally what happens when I scream in a thread to lynch someone and bomb a giant case.
And honestly I'm much more skeptical about a wagon that slowly "creeps" on a player without meaningful resistance than a sudden wagon in an extremely volatile phase of the game (near lynch deadline).
mostly, not only.hapahauli wrote:GC - is your aversion to lynching ac1983fan stillonlybased on his claim?
That's a broad overgeneralization. You need to take more specifics into account.In post 557, GoodCopBadCop wrote:That's just wrong. A waggon on scum usually goes slow whilst a waggon on town goes faster in comparison.In post 551, hapahauli wrote:hp[leaves], so what? I know there wasn't much resistance to the AC wagon. That's generally what happens when I scream in a thread to lynch someone and bomb a giant case.
And honestly I'm much more skeptical about a wagon that slowly "creeps" on a player without meaningful resistance than a sudden wagon in an extremely volatile phase of the game (near lynch deadline).
What are the other reasons?mostly, not only.hapahauli wrote:GC - is your aversion to lynching ac1983fan stillonlybased on his claim?
1-shot doc does exsist on this site. Learn more about the site you are playing on before making assumptions.In post 556, Varsoon wrote:Like, who the fuck is practicing medicine but can only help someone once?
There's no such thing.
I mean, dude can lie, but at least lie better.
In post 363, Toomai wrote:NC asked an arguably suspicion-shifting question in 38, sheeped in 52, uses 212 to call my mistakes scumslips (that might be putting it a bit strong but that's kind of what I see right now), and in 302 called a player town with no reason even though said player had not done anything in 80 posts.In post 350, Jake from Rainbowdash wrote:@ Toomai - why do you think Nic is scum and what do you think of the recent votes on Scott.
Also what's your read on scott.
I have SB as null/very weak scum. I can see why people don't like what he's doing (e.g. 215) but don't currently think it's worth my vote.
"Not worth your vote" then, MAYBE WE CAN GET A WAGON. This guy literally wants to lynch anybody. NC gains steam, hes on there. acfan gains steam hes on there, acfan loses steam jumps back to NC. hap wants to lead a wagon against me, hey maybe we can get some support!In post 515, Toomai wrote:So with the suspended deadline maybe we can get a wagon rolling on SB.
I'm not unvoting NC yet though. He's been at L-1 twice now and needs to claim.
In post 526, hapahauli wrote:There's very little to elaborate on really.hp [leaves wrote: post_id=4960851 time=1368786195 user_id=10128]Hapa I may be willing to join you on the SB wagon if you elaborate your case a bit.
The guy's lack of anything over the last few days is pretty scummy.
I just bombed the thread with suspicion against acfan over the last few days. The most natural thing to want to do is to comment on all of that, since it has been the focus of discussion. Yet not only does Scott completelyavoidthe topic... he goes and starts a new wagon.
So objectively, what is his goal? He says he wants to kick off a new wagon, but he neither puts in the time nor the effort to push it through. Furthermore, given his activity, it looks like he was planning just to plop his vote down and inactive until past the original 18 hour deadline.
------
As a last bit, he's been lightly defending NC, but for someone who doesn't want NC lynched, he's not putting very much effort in not getting NC lynched.
In post 493, Scott Brosius wrote:hp [leaves wrote: post_id=4959324 time=1368734632 user_id=10128]In post 409, Toomai wrote:Well I guess I'll go back to where I was then.
Vote: NicCage
That said, 1-Shot Doctor seems like a really weird claim to me. It's weak and unusual enough that it doesn't look like something that would be faked, but in the same way it's far easier to explain why he's not being killed (since if the claim is true the Mafia probably would like to keep him around for a while to keep suspicion high, as opposed to a full Doctor claim which would make everyone expect instant death).Both opportunistic, weak votes. I still don't understand why we're prioritizing NC over Toomai.In post 383, Toomai wrote:You have me convinced. I felt there was going to be at least one scum in the set of not-common-posters and the evidence seems legit.
Vote: ac1983fan
agree with this 100%. This has been the scummiest behavior I have seen yet. The timing of these votes is too convenient... jumping right in as it takes off, and jumping ship before it completely sinks.
I agree with the no PR d1 lynch group, and I still don't see NC scum. Acfan remaining alive certainly makes night decisions more difficult on scum if he's telling the truth.
There seems to be support for this wagon lingering but nobody wants to take that first step.
unvote, vote: toomai
I expected more than this ya know.Acfan remaining alive certainly makes night decisions more difficult on scum if he's telling the truth.
Secondly, it's not a meta case. Sure I spent a lot of time on meta, but the core is that he's voting a player for reasons OTHER than that player being scum. That's pretty fucking scummy - scum want to lynch people for being "anti-town" and town want to lynch "scummy" players.In post 408, ac1983fan wrote:...
(Oh, and I made an error when responding to your first post. You said your quotes from Open 480 were from Mini 480, and I just assumed they were from one of the games I played back in 07/08. But it was actually from a different game. My bad)
For the record, for the last few pages I have been receptive towards lynching two people:In post 563, Scott Brosius wrote:This guy literally wants to lynch anybody. NC gains steam, hes on there. acfan gains steam hes on there, acfan loses steam jumps back to NC. hap wants to lead a wagon against me, hey maybe we can get some support!
The only thing worth Toomai's vote is any potential lynch.
I thought he was asking since it wasn't Bolded. :shrug:In post 567, Dessx wrote:UNVOTE: Niccage until I know what is going on in this game.
