Mini 1449 - Ordinary Town

hapahauli · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:13 pm

So if Varsoon and Dyslexicon show up, that makes 6 of us. Almost enough to swing a wagon.

If we are last-minute lynching someone, I think we go after a lurker (like Scott). I'm honestly more sure that NC is town than AC fan right now, so wouldn't mind him either (despite my previous misgivings due to Rainbow's post).

Daemon385 · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:13 pm

There are still a few hours left

hapahauli · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:13 pm

Yeah we have time to work as long as we can get the players.

NicCage · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:15 pm

There really aren't the votes around to rethink. I say go ahead unless hap has any other ideas.

Daemon385 · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:15 pm

I'll stay online and constantly refreshing while I guess we all talk this out in the time we do have to decide all this. Idk myself about ACfan on whether his PR is real or not I still have back and forth skepticism on that, but again Scott is an ok lynch with me.

NicCage · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:17 pm

Actually, We have like 14 hours don't we? I'll be around to move my vote so you can count on me

Jake from Rainbowdash · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:17 pm

there is a little over 14 and a half hours left, that means we have until just after 12 noon tomorrow (east coast time)

Daemon385 · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:19 pm

So how many possible voters do we have here online so far? 4-5?

hapahauli · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:19 pm

UNVOTE: NicCage

Let's talk this over some. Are there any other candidates we'd like to explore other than Scott and maybe AC fain?

hapahauli · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:21 pm

Also, I'd rather get this done tonight, since I'm liable to sleep to noon (EST) tomorrow. I'll be up for 4-5 more hours.

Cheery Pie · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:21 pm

In post 640, Jake from Rainbowdash wrote:I'm also ok with an AC lynch cause fuck him if he's actually town. Really fuck both of them IMO.

What happened to the never lynching a day-1 PR claim policy?

hapahauli · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:23 pm

This is not the time for pointless fights right now Cheery. Will you be here for this discussion or not?

NicCage · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:24 pm

I mean, I'd lynch Jake, but I don't feel that strongly about any other players other than ac and scott. Hi Cheery Pie, what do you think of my Jake case?

hapahauli · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:25 pm

I wouldn't lynch Jake, Period. All we know is that he made a bad tunnel on you, and that's not grounds to lynch him.

Plus, he's given more of a shit about this game than most of the players here,

especially

in the chaos of the last few days.

Cheery Pie · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:33 pm

In post 661, hapahauli wrote:This is not the time for pointless fights right now Cheery. Will you be here for this discussion or not?

It's always time to ask about inconsistencies, you never know when you might end up dead.
I'll most likely be online (just a matter of whether I'm online on this account), but I'm not in favour of bringing another wagon to lynch point.

In post 662, NicCage wrote:I mean, I'd lynch Jake, but I don't feel that strongly about any other players other than ac and scott. Hi Cheery Pie, what do you think of my Jake case?

Jake is leaning scum to me already, your case hasn't changed any of that.

hapahauli · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:37 pm

In post 664, Cheery Pie wrote:
In post 661, hapahauli wrote:This is not the time for pointless fights right now Cheery. Will you be here for this discussion or not?
It's always time to ask about inconsistencies, you never know when you might end up dead.
I'll most likely be online (just a matter of whether I'm online on this account), but I'm not in favour of bringing another wagon to lynch point.

Yeah funny when those inconsistencies come about...

In post 662, NicCage wrote:I mean, I'd lynch Jake, but I don't feel that strongly about any other players other than ac and scott. Hi Cheery Pie, what do you think of my Jake case?

Jake is leaning scum to me already, your case hasn't changed any of that.[/quote]

When on earth were you leaning scum on Jake? Since when?

Also, if you were leaning scum on Jake, you were you following him on the NC wagon? What?

hapahauli · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:38 pm

EBWOP:

In post 664, Cheery Pie wrote:
In post 661, hapahauli wrote:This is not the time for pointless fights right now Cheery. Will you be here for this discussion or not?
It's always time to ask about inconsistencies, you never know when you might end up dead.
I'll most likely be online (just a matter of whether I'm online on this account), but I'm not in favour of bringing another wagon to lynch point.

Yeah funny when those inconsistencies come about...

In post 662, NicCage wrote:I mean, I'd lynch Jake, but I don't feel that strongly about any other players other than ac and scott. Hi Cheery Pie, what do you think of my Jake case?
Jake is leaning scum to me already, your case hasn't changed any of that.

When on earth were you leaning scum on Jake? Since when?

Also, if you were leaning scum on Jake, you were you following him on the NC wagon? What?

hapahauli · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:39 pm

I'm seriously contemplating lynching you Cheery. Reading through your filter again... none of it is scumhunting. You just constantly rip on the logic/arguments of others while providing nothing yourself.

Jake from Rainbowdash · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:39 pm

In post 660, Cheery Pie wrote:
In post 640, Jake from Rainbowdash wrote:I'm also ok with an AC lynch cause fuck him if he's actually town. Really fuck both of them IMO.
What happened to the never lynching a day-1 PR claim policy?

his last post was essentially a big FUCK YOU to everyone because he is trying to start a new wagon that nobody else is voting. he is essentially trying to get town to NL

also if you go back at look at his post 400, he had slight scum reads on Dyslexia & HP leaves, yet does nothing to question them, he only mentions Dyslexia's name one time after 400, and it wasn't to question him, it was to say he previously asked him some questions. As for HP, he never mentions him at all except for post 400.

-J

hapahauli · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:41 pm

If Rainbow is on, I want to hear her opinions on AC and Cheery.

Dyslexicon · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:44 pm

I R here.

Dyslexicon · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:44 pm

I R here.

hapahauli · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:47 pm

Dyslexicon - we are not lynching NC today. So it's time to do some scumhunting. Give me some people you would consider lynching in the next few hours.

Cheery Pie · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:50 pm

In post 666, hapahauli wrote:When on earth were you leaning scum on Jake? Since when?

Also, if you were leaning scum on Jake, you were you following him on the NC wagon? What?

Since after Varsoon voted him and I felt that it was a possible bus.
The NC vote came back because I felt he was scummier than acfan and Varsoon wasn't getting lynched.

Jake from Rainbowdash · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Sun May 19, 2013 3:51 pm

going back through cheery's iso to see when he first says I am a scum read (haven't finished yet) but I missed this and wanted to respond to it

In post 412, Cheery Pie wrote:I don't recall seeing this stance in monopoly mafia. (even before Lurker slipped)
You had no troubles lynching a claimed cop in lylo there either.

1. when lurker claimed people actually started un-voting him so why would I have brought it up? If people were still voting him and more started to vote him, I would have said something. After he slipped, I couldn't vote and he pretty much admitted he was scum so this is a moot point. Why bring it up when this scenario is COMPLETELY different?

2. did you seriously mention the 2nd part? first, lylo is NOT the same thing as day 1 and there were a lot of claimed PRs, some OMG at least 1 of the claimed PRs was lying. Out of the claimed PRs he was the most scummiest to me. The fact that you are even mentioning that in relation to a day 1 PR claim is just plain wrong.

You can be scum now

also looking over Cheery's iso, no where does he mention he thinks we are scummy, this does seem to come out of the blue imo

-J

UNVOTE:

don't want to lynch Nic either. If dashie disagrees she can revote

I'd be ok with a AC/Scott/Chery lynch