In post 1879, Thor665 wrote:
Something can hurt town without helping scum - otherwise the term anti-town wouldn't exist.
Oh come on Thor don't play dumb. Of course it can't.
I would guess the term came into existance because someone can do something that benefits scum while being town hence they were anti-town but not scum.
And by saying whatever happened was anti-town you are saying they helped scum ie it benefited scum.
Give me one example of something that is antitown and does NOT help scum.
Just one.
In post 1879, Thor665 wrote:
Also, there *is* a big difference between something hurting town and something helping Mafia.
Which is what you are saying he is and why he is doing what he's doing.
No there isn't a difference. The two are directly related as explained above, it is now on you to show me one example of where your 'theory' comes from.
In post 1879, Thor665 wrote:
Again, are you saying *this playerlist* would tend to make Nacho believe that?
Because that's what you're claiming as a rebuttal to my point - so...y'know, defend the claim.
I said there are many possible reasons this was just one possibility; I see no reason he couldn't have thought he could get massclaim with me in the game on D1 as from his POV he probably expected me to support it strongly.
In post 1879, Thor665 wrote:
Heck no it wouldn't, why would I commit that information to memory?
OK no problem.
I took a look and couldn't see any examples, I guess you are lying???
(lol)
Go and get these examples you found Thor.
In post 1879, Thor665 wrote:
So...it's a shift of his scum...wait for it...meta?
Because otherwise you could just go and show me a scum game where he advocated doing this and then we'd have a lynch already.
No it is not a shift in meta It is more of a one off gambit when hes scum. When he is town sure it is, but when he is scum, this doesn't apply because he is just trying to gain the advantage; ergo he returns to his former stances in future games.
You are assuming a shift for some reason, there is no reason to do so because as you have said there is no obvious reason for such a shift.
But it doesn't make sense from scum! well it does... to gain an advantage like I have said 10 times now... but ohhhhhh Nacho would know he gets caught doing that!
Well maybe Nacho thinks he could get away with it because people will think that.
Nice argument you are making Thor I guess it is now disproved by using the higher level argument? or did you not realise you were arguing WIFOM?
In post 1879, Thor665 wrote:
I'm still correct on the core question of if he should be lynched over the tell.
Nope. You are not correct.
Impossible to prove, just like its impossible to actually prove anyone is scum, it doesn't mean I should not be thinking hes scum it is not impossible to try to work out which it is. I do not believe as town he would support massclaim on D1 I have explained clearly why.
Therefore I think hes scum.
In post 1879, Thor665 wrote:
So your claim is he only sees the benefit of town voting blocks when scum?
Is that where this is going?
No, clearly not, this seems like a 'word twist' we are talking about benefits of massclaiming one of which is that you get a block of town to work with ie a voting block from the PR's and the obvtownreads. If he understands this on D1 of a game (which was part of his argument) where the benefits from such a thing are small then how can he think its bad on D2 where POE is much stronger with 3 dead VT?
I am saying the concept of early massclaim being beneficial were already explained to him so for him to be town there must be a trigger somewhere that changed his whole opinion on these things very drastically; where is the trigger that switched his mentality? where did he become enlightened? there isn't one that I can see and there isn't one that you can see as you have said; therefore hes scum.
Somehow your conclusion is different though...