Not particularly telling...? Dude was on a birthday trip and made a passing comment or two without reading most everything else. I do the same.In post 299, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:What do you think about SOO's lack of commenting on my vote on him?
Are you kidding? I am willing to elaborate on my arguments, and I know perfectly what Ghostlin is saying. Anyone that tries to convince someone to lynch themselves is just stupid.In post 344, Demon wrote:Not exactly getting fuzzy feelings from Amrun. I feel like town would be more willing to elaborate on their arguments/points and get more of a feel for what the other person is saying. Can't tell if genuine frustration is warranted from the Ghost-Amrun back and forth, so.
In short, he always plays like this. He is extremely analytical.In post 348, Demon wrote:Can anyone who is familiar with Iecerint chime in with some meta?
OH HOW PREDICTABLE. Hahahaha.In post 352, Selkies wrote:Ghost being town also makes me worry about amrun
That was mostly my town read of you. not sure how strongly orcinus agreed. Since then, tbh your posts confuse me. I really can't figure out your approach to this game.In post 354, Amrun wrote:
OH HOW PREDICTABLE. Hahahaha.
None of your original "town feelings" for me had ANYTHING at all to do with Ghostlin, but I was generally received positively so your view was positive too. As soon as you see a foothold, you "worry." You're scum. K. Moving on.
Someone asked me (Demon, I think) why self preservation is scummy. That is like mafia 101. Self preservation has always, and will always, be scummy. Not that town should be leaping on the sword, but there's a different mindset to being town and self preservation isn't part of it.
And as for Demon, your hypocrisy is ridiculous. You want to lynch Beli for acting like he's part of scumhunting when he isn't, and you can't even be arsed to read the game and have the gall to act like you're contributing to scumhunting in any meaningful manner. (Hint: you are not.)
Yeah you sucked in itIn post 365, Amrun wrote:uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum
i kind of forget what happened in the name of the wind
and i vaguely remember that it was horrible
and/or i didn't read it
>.>
I'll have a go at explaining this again.In post 181, Amrun wrote:If milk is town, then Ghostlin is a good bet for scum. Notice the casual cognitive dissonance in this post. Milk is "unlikely" to flip town, but SOO's "follow the leader" vote is suspect? Treating her as town while calling her scum.
Yes, I forgot thatIn post 368, Amrun wrote:I vaguely remember that my cousin was murdered during the playing of that game. So yeah.
Except it's not contradictory at all in the mechanics of the game. SOO's vote at the time seemed to either position himself as scum on a wagon to look town--so either a bus or a way to push a lynch you know is safe. Pushing SOO has little to do with Milkshake's actual alignment, which is what I wanted to convey.In post 369, Amrun wrote:I'll have a go at explaining this again.In post 181, Amrun wrote:If milk is town, then Ghostlin is a good bet for scum. Notice the casual cognitive dissonance in this post. Milk is "unlikely" to flip town, but SOO's "follow the leader" vote is suspect? Treating her as town while calling her scum.
Milk is unlikely to flip town, ie is likely to flip scum.
But the way he talks about SoO's vote treats milkshake as town. I have never seen someone call a scum vote a "follow the leader" vote. Later, Ghostlin tries to explain this, iirc, but the original wording still doesn't seem like it's genuinely from a town perspective.
It's like saying "milk is scum, but these people scumfucking onto her wagon are also scum!" It's trying to have your cake and eat it too.
Who does that? Scum.
It's not like that wording CAN'T be explained away, with effort -- Ghostlin is not stupid and would not say something that blatantly contradicts itself. But SUBCONSCIOUSLY, I feel a confliction there.
