God dammit I have a super busy day and I end up 20 pages behind. First, specifics:
In post 174, Cabd wrote:No but actually, why the vote, just because he only posted a few times then went raido silent?
Indeed, why him specifically and not any of the other players who jumped in early and then disappeared.
In post 175, Andrius wrote:Look at the timing of these posts.
All in about 15m he goes from "having a Skype meeting" to "reinforcing he's in a meeting" "meeting ended".
I point this out because
a) why is he posting in a meeting
b) they're all in very close proximity.
Good point. Attention to detail makes me think Andy is town.
In post 199, Andrius wrote:...WHY WOULD YOU CLAIM THAT
WHY, AS TOWN, WOULD YOU CLAIM THE OTHER PART OF YOUR ROLE THIS EARLY
I agree with Nacho- I expected a bit more out of Sven than "hi I have three votes and am now claiming more of my role while it is both unnecessary and uncalled for". As scum there is no motivation to do this.
As scum the only reason for doing this is to claim to stay alive but there REALLY isn't this much pressure on his this early.
This. If Svenkst is scum, I will be shocked.
In post 210, Varsoon wrote:Oh, that's what I did in a different game. Don't worry so much about that, Orcinus. I'll be playing pretty regular town today with a bit of sleuthing if I find time for it.
...This in no way contradicts your entrance into the game.
In post 236, Varsoon wrote:@GIF: I know it's okay to link, I'm just saying that I don't like meta. How a player was/what their role was in another game shouldn't be a defense for them in this game.
Their play should be a defense for them in this game.
No. Most players have consistent patterns in how they play town or scum, and it is valid to use knowledge of how other people tend to play different roles to get reads on them. It would be stupid not to.
Why. You said you are good at reading him, so I would like your reasoning here.
253 is a really strong argument.
358 going to cover this entire engagement in a paragraph.
Yay, another person who can tell me why he's town. Oh, Beauty and the Beast agrees. I'm not seeing it.
Why?
There are plenty of us who need to post more. There are players who still have 0 for content.
In post 624, GuyInFreezer wrote:For some reason I feel like I'm invisible every time I'm playing mafia. :T
What do?
What is the point of posting this?
In post 683, Varsoon wrote:I'd prefer to leave other games out of the discussion of this game because people should be judged solely on their performance in this game to find their alignment in -this- game.
You mentioned not liking meta-defenses earlier, I figure you'd actually understand where I'm coming from with this.
Dat misrep. He was referring specifically to not liking meta defenses on meta that doesn't exist in response to a point I had made about Sven's claim. Here:
In post 118, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:It's stupid because "oh because he doesn't have a meta of fake claiming miller so this miller claim must be real!" makes a surprising amount of nonsense. Sven's meta wrt miller claims shouldn't be considered when evaluating it.
Oh, and meta is still a useful tool. You're opposition to it is baffling and seems scum-motivated. Scum start out with more information than town, town should be using every tool available to level the playing field. Meta analysis of players is one of those tools.
Care to explain? Cite specific evidence, not just his entire corpus. I don't see the scumminess in there.