In post 201, Aj The Epic wrote:
This is my kind of math.
Miller-tracker in non-bastard game? Eh... I really don't like it at all. One part is always mafia (red investigation) and the other is mafia-capable (tracker). But, at the same time, I really think this is the better vote.
VOTE: TiphaineDeath
Too many bad posts. Voting Nacho immediately because no scum would ever miller claim? Bad. If you don't think scum would do it, they'll try it. Unvoting with "Huh, interesting". Also bad. Bad scum must die, and I wish I could do math with that name but I can't.
I can hardly do math anyways.
AJ - first few posts he was on a player that I thought looked scummy (TD).
Post 617 - reinforces the read, irritable about thread size. The irritability gave me a town feel.
Post 774 - really disliked some of his reads in this post - Orcinus, Svenskt. otoh the Andrius read and explanation in 783 reads well
945 - true observation about Mac, but Mac tends to do that as town I think.
1148 - tactical back away from TD? trajectory sucked, but lots of thread between posts here.
1291 - I actually like this post. He picked up quite a bit on my overall hydra play style, though my style is still morphing. I feel like he's reading the thread carefully, not just flipping through, to develop observations like this one and the Mac read in 945.
Starting around 1386 he turns his focus to TMT. This the second player where his attitude about his read is really strong. From my meta dives, this much conviction is what I thought was not as pronounced in his scum game.
Will reread a completed scum game or two to be sure I have the focus thing right.
- f
