MattP has been prodded. Nero Cain and Iecerint have 5 hours.
The deadline for Day 1 is Monday, June 3rd, at 9 PM EST. This is in (expired on 2013-06-03 21:00:00).
Not sure which one you are asking about?In post 578, Ms Marangal wrote:Ffery, explain that scum-read to me?
I still hate this. So if Milk were to flip scum then I’d want a GCBC lynch.In post 141, Nero Cain wrote:In post 131, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:Not liking Nero's 83 framing post without the gusto to make the vote himself until he gets the backing from MattP.
And yet Milk didn't want to vote Matt until she got backing from me
What kind of town gets called scum and is all like “OK!!!”In post 191, Selkies wrote:I like your analyses, Amrun. Welcome to the game.
I think this is a great post as to why.In post 195, milkshake wrote:I know you didn't, but it followed from what you had said at that point that you SHOULD have. To demonstrate this, we can take a look at post #133 by Selkies where they express the same opinion.In post 180, Nero Cain wrote:yea, I never pushed for a Matt lynch.In post 177, milkshake wrote:because the bulk of the rationale for MattP's lynch came from an opinion held by Nero
Someone who is more interested in finding a player who could be town than in a potential vote on their own bandwagon.In post 583, Nero Cain wrote:What kind of town gets called scum and is all like “OK!!!”
Humm... youIn post 582, Amrun wrote:Game-wise, I don't see anything I am particularly compelled to write about, except that sword of omens is painfully town. He's towwwwwwwwwwwn. TOWN.
ToIn post 429, Amrun wrote: I have a town read on milkshake. Not TOWNTOWNTOWN, but town.Sword I am much closer to null, but if forced at gunpoint to pick, I'd say leaning town.
Do share your font of wisdom, as I see none of what you see.
What exactly did you mean by fading into the woodwork?In post 566, Selkies wrote:Nero Cain (he recovered a little from our early scum read, but has mostly faded into the woodwork lately)
This was one of the examples I was thinking about, but rereading it, he was answering a question with "demon" and was asking Selkies/us why I didn't vote him when I said I suspected him. At the time, he was not my number 1 suspect though - just the first person who had pinged for me. my other suspect at the time was milkshake, and I think that's where orcinus had put our vote.
^^ this is an example of him trying to push associations when other people bring up scummy looking players.In post 120, Nero Cain wrote:I could buy that. You think he may have listed a buddy in Demon/Selk?In post 118, Ghostlin wrote:SOO's vote seems to be a follow the leader vote
^^ More pushing of associations.In post 186, Nero Cain wrote:I'm like 99.9% that I voiced on opinion on Matt in 78. I read the situation totally different then you. In 79 it does look a heckva lot like Milk is try to get me to vote Matt when I already said that I wasn't interested in lynching Matt today. I feel like she was not trying to get me to "commit to an opinion" but trying to get me to move my vote off of Selk. Considering that you have a scum read on Selk, do you not find it just a little strange that she doing this? Or do you think it was a whole coinkydink and its less likely they are scumbudz?In post 181, Amrun wrote:She was picking up on some things from Nero that I also picked up on (hesitance to commit to an opinion) and while she seemed to view this less negatively than me, she was harrying Nero to commit just the same, which is what I would have done in her shoes.
In post 243, Nero Cain wrote:I think they're both independently scummy and since I know we don't have two scum teams and its not confirmed if we have an sk or not so it does make me want to put them together. I mean the whole "Nero votes Selk, Milk tried to get Nero to unvote Selk" seems a lil' weird but maybe you're right and its just a big coincidence.In post 223, Amrun wrote:Why do you think milk and selk are grouped together? I find that unlikely, though not impossible.
^^ and more.In post 469, Nero Cain wrote:This *might* be a link between SOO and Miss Des. Sure, as the pressure on SOO heated up she kinda backtracked to distance herself. But I'd be tempted to kill this when/if SOO flips scum.In post 237, Miss Destroyer wrote:Swords, I initially liked your reason because it was the most detailed on of those on the Milkshake wagon and I had glazed through it. there are nearly 2 pages of between those two posts you have stated and a few people have made good points on you as well, which caused me to reconsider. That, and I had taken a closer look at that post and realized it wasn't as good as I had originally thought
Reposting this for SoO.In post 511, Iecerint wrote:SoO, it looks like you were bothered by Ghostlin's indicating that you didn't vote in your post, but it didn't bother you when I basically asked you the same question (albeit in a much less inflammatory fashion)?