Pages 1 and 2 are a load of pointless back and forth over RVS.
I like to try to find town and work with them. It makes it harder for scum when there are a group of town players with good reads on each other, working together.
Here are my thoughts running through the thread up to here.
page 2:
In post 71, ThaneArvan wrote: In post 70, jmo16mla wrote:VOTE: thane
You haven't taken any stances, placed a vote or anything of that nature.
Honestly, at this point I feel that nothing has happened that is at all scummy enough to deserve a vote, and honestly there is very little in this thread that I can take a stance on. I will go back through again and see if there is anyone that jumps out at me the second time around, but I typically do not vote unless I feel that I would be okay lynching the person I voted... At this point nothing has occurred that would give me reason to vote by that logic.
This was a straightforward reply
In post 72, jmo16mla wrote:Not using your vote is anti town.
Ludgi, how do you feel about thane?
That's bullshit.
And you're one to use this anti-town line when you're not interested in getting town reads and working with town?
To me scum are the ones who like to pick up on "anti-town" play.
Where's
your
pro-town play jmo?
In post 73, ThaneArvan wrote:I have played mafia in real life but never via forum, I am used to beig able to rely on expressions and tone. I'm not quite sure where I go from here with progressing advice. Can one of the ICs explain this to me? Also, I fail to see how it is anti town not to use a vote
So do I fail so see. On the contrary I assert that it is pro-town to use your vote wisely to get scum lynched, pressure players and other things. If you have no place to put your vote due to no strong reason to vote, then you'd be anti-town to place it.
You don't have to "take a stand" page 2, after your first post.
jmo might not be interested in finding town, but if this is his version of scum-hunting we have one of the most anti-town IC's imaginable.
Okay now the stuff over into pages 3 and 4 I pretty much agree with what everyone saw was wrong with
luigiwise
opportunist vote.
Role is now
Tala
. Have to see who that plays out meanwhile....
In post 97, tybalt wrote:Both asked questions that propelled us out of RVS, pro town playing.
Mala's 15, 50, 93. Analyzing scumreads instead of fostering them to result in possible lynch later in the day
Moth's 39 also.
Asking questions to other people and catches scumtells
Okay tybalt is town.
In post 98, talah wrote:
Why herro
Happy to replace in, nice to meet you all. At work atm but read through most of this earlier today waiting for a sub conf.; will review this arvo.
For now,
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Greywing
Some good analysis coming from GW, maybe a bit
too
good? I wonder if he's missed out on tentatively reading anyone yet?
PS - @any IC - how does the preview function work? I can't seem to see the end-formatting of my 'prospective' posts
This is a terrible vote immediately on placing in.
In post 102, Greywing wrote: In post 98, talah wrote:For now,
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Greywing
Some good analysis coming from GW, maybe a bit
too
good? I wonder if he's missed out on tentatively reading anyone yet?
So...I'm scum because I'm a decent player?
Good question
WTF?
In post 112, Malakittens wrote:Meaning.. If he ends up flipping scum and I didn't push hard enough - ill be annoyed at myself.
So it's kinda like I think he could be scum going after an easy target and I don't want to not push and allow him to slide straight by incase he's actually scum.
I think I need sleep
I think some pushing there is probably best right now. But talah should be the lynch today I think, based on what I've seen so far.
In post 114, talah wrote: In post 111, Honey bee wrote: In post 98, talah wrote:
VOTE: Greywing
Some good analysis coming from GW, maybe a bit
too
good? I wonder if he's missed out on tentatively reading anyone yet?
Excuse me, WHAT? I have no idea what this is suppose to mean or how its scummy. Like either you are working on some higher level thinking or this just makes no sense.
HA! Indeed, I think I was a bit hasty with my faux-RVS on Greywing. Looking back over the thread I can see he actually questioned the basis of a vote from Thane on Luigi (which is now me), so that's a major point in his favour, soft as the defence was.
UNVOTE: Greywing
Mala, Mala, Mala. Thanks for being welcoming, but I think this is Freudian, despite (or perhaps because of) needing sleep, and your explanation doesn't make sense:
In post 110, Malakittens wrote:You already asked me this. I'm not, but
I don't want you to flip scum
looking for an easy target.
You've also placed the Finger of Suspicion (by stating as scum-read), on Luigi (now me).
Lastly, you've been LynchCounting:
I don't know that Town would bother - it feels a bit wrong to me either way.
VOTE: Malakittens
PS. Preview's working now; must have been technical difficulties.
Lol this is just so fucking lol.
In post 115, talah wrote:Apologies, EBWODP - quote tags wrong.
In post 87, Malakittens wrote:
Jmo's vote looked like a pressure vote. It didn't bother me, but Luigi's vote did.
Plus
Luigi's vote puts Thane at L-2
and as I said it looks like an opportunist jump.
In post 116, talah wrote:So really.. timezones notwithstanding.. I need to triple-post for a reaction?
Let's just win the 'quickest knewb game' award by lynching Mala and Thane in quick succession.
(caveat -
@Mala
, you said you were V/LA for a couple of days so I'm prepared to wait for a non-sleep-deprived explanation, if you have one.
)
@Thane
, can you explain please why you think Mala would defend your position; in theory if you are Town. You also promised thread activity in Post 62, which hasn't eventuated yet. Here's your chance.
Prefectly timed hedge: I'll back off if you give me a nice reason that you were tired and not thinking?!?!
There was absolutely nothing wrong, apart from a badly worded sentence which - in context - was pretty straightforward to see what was intended. Besides, I've watched a few games with mala in, when she's been playing with my friends here, and I feel I'm seeing a very definite mala town. In fact, I'm gonna go and say that mala is def town. That's called a town read. Now I'm happy to try to work with mala to lynch scum.
Town: malakittens, tybalt; null; p much all the rest, a few slightly towny and maybe one other scumspect but nothing worth bringing up yet as I want to see how things develop and how other replacements fare meanwhile.
scum: talah
scummy to null to just arrogant: jmo.
In post 125, talah wrote:
Thanks, I didn't want that to be taken personally by you but thanks for clarifying anyway. Thanks also for mentioning you *have* seen it used elsewhere, cuz I suspect I have too.
Malakittens wrote:
I never said I wanted to 'prevent' a scum flip. I am very paranoid that JMO's vote on Thane is just sitting there. I don't feel that he's hunting anyone else and that his vote is just sitting on Thane. If JMO happens to flip scum and I didn't push *this* case hard enough - I'll be pissed off because I let him slide by halfway unnoticed.
Fair enough I reckon. I have noted you've been a bit paranoid earlier so I hope you'll be happy enough to answer any questions later. Is your vote on JMO right now? Last votecount I can see he doesn't have any. Maybe he needs to splains hisself.
UNVOTE: Malakittens
VOTE: jmo16mla
Hmm.
jmo, what are your thoughts on the talah slot, and this vote in particular.
also, who are your top scum picks at this point.
I'll not put down a vote until I know what the lie of the land is.
until then
UNVOTE: just in case I missed anything.