@Kerb --
What does this mean?Kerberos wrote:The tactics Wisdom is using to avoid the gun amuses me
Why?Oil wrote:This is not at all acceptable, Bork.
I think his spat with me was fucking dumb -- I'm not sure where you're getting that I think it's disingenuous.Oil wrote:Arc is slightly scum for you?
That doesn't seem right to me.
Also I thought your read on Wisdom was a bit stronger; you were attacking him decently heavily earlier.
Or you can read and not get a biased recapIn post 1085, don_johnson wrote:ns: I know how to read. been away, would like a recap.
I remember you disagreeing with those pointsIn post 1084, notscience wrote:@Bork- I liked a lot of Wisdoms points against you
Your initial scumread is my top scumreadIn post 1082, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Btw bork what? Why would you like me off that one post?
Pretty sure I remember you calling it bunk:NS wrote:@Bork- I liked a lot of Wisdoms points against you, and it shifted it a bit. I'm kinda shaky on your slot though, I could easily see it being feg instead.
So...? Where/why did that shift in opinion happen?In post 678, notscience wrote:...And Wisdom, I kinda side with him on this one. Although I see your point, look at how many people he has to look through. 9. You're his 5th worst, also his 5th best(in terms of towniness). So, while I don't see why he brought it up, I can see his point. You're right on the border, and if he's wrong about one of them below you, that puts you with them. You're essentially in the null spot right now, which is kinda what I saw him saying.In post 675, TheIrishPope wrote:And now you're doing the same with me. I don't get it.
Hmmmm. I'm not quite sure if it is due to you having these great gaps between posts or not (I'm prone to attribute that to scum, which could be part of it) I'm not quite sure where it swapped, I think it was more sheeping Wisdom than anything, seeing as I agreed on the other 3, why not play along with the last.In post 1088, borkjerfkin wrote:Your initial scumread is my top scumreadIn post 1082, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Btw bork what? Why would you like me off that one post?
Pretty sure I remember you calling it bunk:NS wrote:@Bork- I liked a lot of Wisdoms points against you, and it shifted it a bit. I'm kinda shaky on your slot though, I could easily see it being feg instead.
So...? Where/why did that shift in opinion happen?In post 678, notscience wrote:...And Wisdom, I kinda side with him on this one. Although I see your point, look at how many people he has to look through. 9. You're his 5th worst, also his 5th best(in terms of towniness). So, while I don't see why he brought it up, I can see his point. You're right on the border, and if he's wrong about one of them below you, that puts you with them. You're essentially in the null spot right now, which is kinda what I saw him saying.In post 675, TheIrishPope wrote:And now you're doing the same with me. I don't get it.
meh. finding out where people's bias is can be helpful. but whatevz.notscience wrote:Or you can read and not get a biased recapIn post 1085, don_johnson wrote:ns: I know how to read. been away, would like a recap.