Votecount 1.2
7 votes to lynch.
Viomi- L7
Nachomamma8- L7
Wisdomenomis- L6
Ms Marangal- L7
Voodoo Lady- L7
absta101- L7
The Acting Method- L7
enomiVoodoo Lady- L6
Core_H86- L7
Mutleyddmc- L7
Vigilante VentriloquistThe Acting Method, Wisdom- L5
mujieVigilante Ventriloquist- L6
Deadline (expired on 2013-06-23 17:58:12)
I won't say I wasn't leaving the possibility open, but I wasn't looking for anything useful to come of it.In post 49, Voodoo Lady wrote:...are you really trying to tell me that you weren't trolling for reactions here? Because I can see at least three openings for that here.
See, it's this kind of thing that tells me you can't read. If you were capable of reading, you wouldn't need to ask me.In post 52, Wisdom wrote:Holy fuck.
Did you say that scum would never post what Voodoo posted or not?
In this setup, it has a history of being scummy. I've seen 3 polygamists, I've played in two, modded the other (the other was offsite) Of those three, the first person to promote/suggest an early lover claim turned out to be scum twice for certain. I don't recall the 3rd game what happened...In post 41, Vigilante Ventriloquist wrote:Okay, so this tell is independent of whether or not I believe what I said - so you're saying it's the act itself of suggesting a claim strategy (or maybe this particular claim strategy, though tbh that would make no sense whatsoever) that's scummy.
Now I'm going to assume that you don't think it's scummy simply because you've seen scum do it twice (that would not require any sort of miracle of probability). So what I'm wondering is: what about it do you find intrinsically scummy?
I like hearing myself speak (and type, because keyboards turn me on), so I'm going to try to guess at a possible answer:Suggesting a claim strategy is scummy because it's a way for scum to appear useful without harming their win condition (if they truly believe their claim strategy is correct, they would think someone else would suggest it anyway).If that's what you think of it, how do you feel about the context of my suggestion within my post? Surely you wouldn't be calling something scummy in a vacuum, so how does the post containing my suggestion influence your view of the suggestion?
So your vote for Enomis was genuine, VV?In post 53, Vigilante Ventriloquist wrote:I won't say I wasn't leaving the possibility open, but I wasn't looking for anything useful to come of it.In post 49, Voodoo Lady wrote:...are you really trying to tell me that you weren't trolling for reactions here? Because I can see at least three openings for that here.
Did you know the probability of that happening twice by chance is just under 1/6? If it actually happened 2 out of 3 times, there's a 35.2% chance of it happening at least that many times in your sample size. And with a sample size of 2 to 3 games, there's a significant chance that the actual probability is nowhere near what you seem to be equating it to. Basing a vote on what you've seen twice andIn post 56, The Acting Method wrote:In this setup, it has a history of being scummy. I've seen 3 polygamists, I've played in two, modded the other (the other was offsite) Of those three, the first person to promote/suggest an early lover claim turned out to be scum twice for certain. I don't recall the 3rd game what happened...
If this was any other scenario, I wouldn't think it scummy, but here with the history I have, I'm highly inclined to think it scum behavior.
No. Neither was yours, but I doubt yours was a reaction test either.LooDoo Vady wrote:So your vote for Enomis was genuine, VV?
It was definitely intentional in one of those games, I should point out.In post 61, Vigilante Ventriloquist wrote:Did you know the probability of that happening twice by chance is just under 1/6? If it actually happened 2 out of 3 times, there's a 35.2% chance of it happening at least that many times in your sample size. And with a sample size of 2 to 3 games, there's a significant chance that the actual probability is nowhere near what you seem to be equating it to. Basing a vote on what you've seen twice andIn post 56, The Acting Method wrote:In this setup, it has a history of being scummy. I've seen 3 polygamists, I've played in two, modded the other (the other was offsite) Of those three, the first person to promote/suggest an early lover claim turned out to be scum twice for certain. I don't recall the 3rd game what happened...
If this was any other scenario, I wouldn't think it scummy, but here with the history I have, I'm highly inclined to think it scum behavior.would not otherwise consider scummydoes not make sense.
I was under the impression that if you had a legit townread on me in that post, you would also have a legit scumread in that same post. But this is sensible as well.VVV wrote:No. Neither was yours, but I doubt yours was a reaction test either.LooDoo Vady wrote:So your vote for Enomis was genuine, VV?
Fair, but TAM said that this was a tell regardless of whether or not I believed claiming pairs to be a pro-town strategy and that was what I was trying to address.In post 62, Voodoo Lady wrote:It was definitely intentional in one of those games, I should point out.
Not even reading more past this.In post 6, Voodoo Lady wrote:Insulting the intelligence of your fellow townies is highly impolite. This obviously makes you scum.
VOTE: enomis
