Newbie 1390 -- Game Over

[goodmorning]

So what is it then? Looks like an activity tell to me.

[Cabd]

I suppose you'll have to wait until they show up, now won't you?

All in good time, I assure you.

[TheGarantula]

All in good time, I assure you.

^^ So relevant

[JasonWazza]

I suppose you'll have to wait until they show up, now won't you?

All in good time, I assure you.

If it's all in good time, hence your waiting for some shit post to come, hence you are banking on it being an activity tell and them flailing?

UNVOTE: goodmorning
VOTE: Cabd

For trying to make your "tell's" seem like more then they are.

And making it look like your gonna use posts after the person confirms to call them scum.

[Nobody Special]

Votecount 1.02

(corrected)

Derivan - 2 - Cabd, Fegelein
Fegelein - 2 - goodmorning, TheGarantula
Cabd - 1 - JasonWazza
Guyett - 1 - Darq

Not Voting: Guyett, bestwillcui, Derivan

Deadline: (expired on 2013-06-27 02:37:53)

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

[Derivan]

I suppose you'll have to wait until they show up, now won't you?

All in good time, I assure you.

/Confirm

Hello all, getting an avatar and reading the thread. First time on this site, but played a few games before.

Cabd, sure would like to hear your semi-serious reason.

[Fegelein]

@Mod: I'm voting Derivan, not myself as well.

Fixed, thanks. ~~NS

OK, let me explain why I called it a semi-serious vote.

I wanted the bandwagon to accumulate to L-2, so we could gauge Derivan's reaction. 1 vote isn't going to get a reaction out of somebody, but 3 will. His recent post was null though.

That being said, I'm willing to actually switch onto Cabd, attempting to use activity as a scumtell is scummy in itself in my personal opinion. People can't post everytime they come online, and calling them out for it, especially this early in the game is daft.

UNVOTE: Derivan
VOTE: Cabd

[Derivan]

Ok, finished reading here goes.

Fegelein (not Cabd, sorry...really need to read before I jump in) thanks for posting your semi-serious reasoning. I understand the pressure idea since I hadn't posted.

Anyone else have thoughts on JasonWazza and Fegelein's recent bandwagon jump?

My thoughts are that at least one of them is targeting Cabd and Goodmorning since they appear to be strong players and have posted the most.

I'm not big on activity tells, but do expect analysis on voting. That being said would be great to hear from Darq and bestwillcui. I am currently abroad so will be on at odd hours if you guys are stateside.

That being said.

VOTE: JasonWazza

[JasonWazza]

So wait your reason for voting me is because........ i voted someone who you have a problem with as well?

What is your reason?

[Guyett]

hey quick question, can the mafia communicate with each other all the time or just at night time? theeeenks

[JasonWazza]

Only night

[Guyett]

So this is usually RVS, but in this case, the mod seems to have messed up and sent me the alignment chart. Therefore Derivan and Darq are the scum. Game over~

VOTE: Derivan

How would you get the names of two scum from the alignment chart?

[Guyett]

Only night

Thought so, thanks.

So does that means the mafia know the other one is and has to attempt to guess what the other is planning? or is it blind for the first day and they have to guess who the other mafia is by telling if they are scummy enough and then work towards getting heat off their backs?

[JasonWazza]

Only night

Thought so, thanks.

So does that means the mafia know the other one is and has to attempt to guess what the other is planning? or is it blind for the first day and they have to guess who the other mafia is by telling if they are scummy enough and then work towards getting heat off their backs?

Mafia know each other as soon as they get the PM

They can talk pre-game and each night.

[Derivan]

So wait your reason for voting me is because........ i voted someone who you have a problem with as well?

What is your reason?

Because as I stated in my post, you have voted for the two players (with an early bandwagon switch) who have posted the most and appear to be strong players.

In other discussion I agree it is a scummy that Cabd claimed that the MOD sent him info mistakenly.

[JasonWazza]

So i'm scum because i don't believe the people who posted most are necessarily town?

Or I am scum for voting on 2 people?

[Guyett]

I'm leaning towards Cabd too at the moment.

[Fegelein]

I don't get the logic about me and Jason voting off the 2 most experienced players here, I never put a vote on goodmorning.

I'm pretty sure Cabd was joking about him being sent info, it was just an RVS vote.

I also have an early town read on Guyett.

[TheGarantula]

Spoiler: Responses to some posts so far

hey quick question, can the mafia communicate with each other all the time or just at night time? theeeenks

This could either be Guyett claiming Town or WIFOM-ing as scum so it doesn't tell us much. I'll just write it off as inexperience.

How would you get the names of two scum from the alignment chart?

Yeah, this was just a joke. It was part of RVS

I don't get the logic about me and Jason voting off the 2 most experienced players here, I never put a vote on goodmorning.

I think he was referring to your vote on Cabd, since JasonWazza voted GM during RVS and then Cabd more recently. His argument is that one or both of you are scummy for voting the more experienced players first on shaky grounds.

Which leads me to this:

In other discussion I agree it is a scummy that Cabd claimed that the MOD sent him info mistakenly.

You think:
1. Cabd is scummy
2. Wazza and Fegelein are scummy for voting Cabd

This doesn't really make sense. To me it comes off as scummy, as you have the most scum reads and none of them make that much sense. What do you say about this?

TL;DR:
Derivan yunomakesense?
VOTE: Derivan

[goodmorning]

Because as I stated in my post, you have voted for the two players (with an early bandwagon switch) who have posted the most and appear to be strong players.

I feel obligated to point out here that effort and ability are not in any way correlated with alignment.

In other discussion I agree it is a scummy that Cabd claimed that the MOD sent him info mistakenly.

I took that as a joke and if it becomes the key point in anyone's case on him I shall laugh.

@Feg: So you said it was semi-serious in an attempt to get a reaction, or you treat pressure votes as semi-serious? Which of those is the case?

I also have an early town read on Guyett.

Really? Interesting.

@Derivan:
I realize that Garantula has brought this up, but I'm going to reword it more sensibly. You think Cabd has committed a scumtell. Why would it be unreasonable for others to vote him for it (IYO)?

In other news, I have a light Townread on Garantula.

[Fegelein]

Semi-serious to get a reaction.

Derivan is stumbling over his words a bit, but he's not overly scummy.

[JasonWazza]

In other news, I have a light Townread on Garantula.

Why is it you are giving him a town read for mentioning the thing when i mentioned it like 6 posts before hand?

[TheGarantula]

Derivan is stumbling over his words a bit, but he's not overly scummy.

Let's wait to hear what he and Cabd have to say about their respective wagons. There isn't much content from either one yet

[goodmorning]

In other news, I have a light Townread on Garantula.

Why is it you are giving him a town read for mentioning the thing when i mentioned it like 6 posts before hand?

Why is it you are assuming that's what I'm townreading him for?

[goodmorning]

Also V/LA til Monday at the latest.