In post 153, DoctorPepper wrote:Forgot to add. Yessirree, why do you question JK's vote on you but not mine when we had similar reasons.
Gene your posts made me facepalm. One, crimes? Rape? What place do they have in this game. Two, mafia do worry about getting caught, thats why they make their posts cautiously, because you look for a mafioso through 2 things. a) his posts motivation and b) his scumminess. Words are the only tool you have in this game, which is why maf should be cautious.
And slips exist! Slips are something the mafia accidentally says and they get caught by town for it, like if I was mafia, then I'd say something stupid that makes it obvious I was mafia.
Bacde, look at yessiree now. Or rather look at gene's list and his interactions with yes.
Maybe you didn't read everything, but as I've said before, I DID NOT focus on the votes, JKM's jumping to conclusions just seemed rather ridiculous for me to accept. If you go back to re-read everything you will see this, I don't have explain myself twice.
On the other hand, after I put gene at L-1, you immediately unvoted. The interesting part is, after that, you vanished out in the background after. There is a possibility that, if gene is scum, you are his partner. You went into lurking to see how things unfold.
Next point, gene's list of reads does make it seem that he and I are scum partners. However, how much do you give credit to that? You are an SE, and it seems you are willing to lynch someone based on a scrambled list of reads from a flattered newb. The fact that you repeatedly state that you are comfortable with lynching either him or me, is a perfect distraction to get the center of attention from you, isn't it?
In addition, with only half of the players actively posting, trying to push a lynch without considering as many opinions as possible, makes me more suspicious of you. Bcade is not affected by this logic because he is the first to vote on gene, and he has a much more sound reason to keep it that way.
I will be watching you.