In post 639, BROseidon wrote:Good point.In post 604, penguin_alien wrote:I'm definitely waiting on TMTOLBTWNTOF's thoughts to start out today, given that he had ArcAngel9 and Ghostlin as his top scum reads. And his take on the supersaint claim seems off. Given his scum reads, one of whom was at L-1 and the other of whom was ready to hammer at the risk of being supersainted, why not put down the vote to get to L-1? Takes care of both problems. Instead it's characterized as interesting and noted as lynch-dodging behavior.
Okay I like ghosts 614 a lot. Basically the same response to FBN that I had.
FBN, what is the "history" of the supersaint claim that you refer to? Some of us haven't been here very long and don't know shit like that, and from a theoretical perspective I can see huge scum motivation in a supersaint fakeclaim and no VT motivation for the fakeclaim.
First off, it's not full of shot. I've been reading these games since early 2009, so unless you've been here longer than that, I'd retract that statement. The whole thing with the supersaint claim is simply the fact that no one ever believes it, making it down right suicidal to do. IF someone claims it, it's usually because they believe scum is going to hammer them.
