Morning. Busy today but I have time over breakfast to respond to people.
In post 411, Calcifer wrote: In post 211, DOMO wrote:his posts are starting to look full of fluff (while attempting to appear not fluff)
What does this even mean?
In post 312, DOMO wrote:scummy, speculation on scum numbers seems fake - BRO is scum read
why does it seem fake?
You think that King Crabd would be worried about defending a scumbuddy so early? Against TiP?
1. I dunno, that was djd, I'll let him tell you what he's thinking there. There's no explanation in our QT for this vote of his, all I can say is I didn't disagree with the vote to the point I thought "wtf is this". But the fluff comments, you'll have to wait for him for an explanation there.
2. Gut I guess, these are my notes as I read through. I see he's replied so I'll address him directly.
3. It's possible, I don't know tbh. I have limited experience with cabd, and no experience with the others. Again, read up notes. TIP was getting a lot of VI accusations, I don't feel that at all, he's stirring up a lot of shit and it seems to me like he's being discredited. But while there were a few things kingcrab did that pinged slightly, there was the odd townish post too, so there's a good chance I'm barking up the wrong tree here.
In post 415, BROseidon wrote:wtf why would you ever organize a reads list this way?
@Domo do you think Ank is powerbussing me, then? You have us both down as likely scum.
Those I'm null on are in the scum pool and have to town their way out. Putting people in the scum pool gets a reaction, I like reactions.
Do I think ank is bussing you? I don't think so now. It crossed my mind while reading through, sure.
In post 415, BROseidon wrote:Wow this logic is terrible. Seriously, that I don't know how many scum there are so I assume some number for a point makes me scum? In what universe does that make sense?
At the risk of repeating myself, it was gut as I read through. Your reaction to prohawk's list was to vote for him and tell us it was a terrible idea. I didn't think it was a terrible idea, I thought it was a good reaction test. And then you're immediately speculating on scum numbers, and the language seemed careful. "Let's say there's 6 scum" seemed like a deliberate attempt to not scumslip. Maybe that's just me being paranoid. But I've already said why I wanted to post my gut reads as I read through, I'm starting to get a little more faith in my early reads because of recent d1 is where I've been right.
Right now you're the one who I felt was scummiest as I read through. I'm yet to discuss these reads with djd, that will happen soon I hope because while I accept I'm going to be the dominant head here, I respect djd's opinion and will accept I'm being a retard if he thinks so. But you telling me my logic is terrible isn't going to shift me. It wouldn't be the first time scum called me terrible when I was onto something. It also wouldn't be the first time I was talking shit.