The Ghostlin case does seem to come back to people questioning things about the supersaint claim. Which makes this:
In post 700, ChannelDelibird wrote:Exactly. The act itself is equal, meaning that it does not give you the townpoints to outweigh the other things that I find scummy about you, that I have discussed in previous posts. I'm not voting you for the hammer. I'm voting you for other things because the hammer is null.
not something I can see backed up. To start out last day phase, you said:
In post 672, ChannelDelibird wrote:I'll start with Ghostlin. The way he went about the hammer looks town (probably enough to ignore him today) but I still have reservations.
Your reservations, as far as I can tell, come from his vote on Saint at the beginning of Day One. I know some people think early-game is where they do their best scumhunting, but you're not specifically referring back to that case. If these reasons you discussed earlier are so compelling, why not detail them?
You are right that Amrun and Ghostlin vote together a lot, but the end of Day One is a matter of Amrun being around to put ArcAngel9 to L-1 at Ghostlin's request. That they both piled on TMTOLBTWNTOF early, spent a lot of time voting him Day One, and aren't looking any more deeply into that lynch niggles at me. And in terms of final wagons, BROseidon manages to be following right along with them.
fuzzy, you say Ghostlin is trying to set up the masons. But the closest I've seen to people not taking it as a given is here:
In post 674, BROseidon wrote:
How does he know it's not a scum gambit?
In addition to, you know, the entire rest of the post being weak as fuck.
Where BROseidon uses someone rolling with the claim as a reason to call them scum.
Amrun-Ghostlin being in lockstep aside, BROseidon spends a lot of time setting people up without making any actual cases he has to defend. As in here:
He specifies later with the quote above about TWTOLBTWNTOF buying the masons claim too readily for his taste. Why not say what's making you vote at the time? Town shouldn't be cautious about putting their cases out there for people to consider. It's what he did on Day One with Ghostlin:
In post 429, penguin_alien wrote:
You're asking to talk about a read but not kicking things off. You've been mentioning he's a scum read, but the most you've said about why is:
In post 201, BROseidon wrote:
I don't like Ghost's vote for letters and subsequent only commenting on the modkill thing. Do like his earning votes point, though
and not addressing anything he's done since. It reads like you're trying to get others to make a case for you or give you something to attack.
Saint seems to be scum hunting more, and the last time I played with someone who was so abrasive they did turn out to be town.
UNVOTE: Saint
VOTE: BROseidon
Do you have some reason to think that RachMarie is scummy? The chattiness seems more null to me.
And tried to paint RachMarie as scummy pre-masons claim for a weak reason.
Amrun, if you have something you want me to address, have at it; otherwise (and regardless, really) I'd like to hear your take on BROseidon, specifically his interaction with the TMTOLBTWNTOF wagon last day phase.
VOTE: BROseidon