poorly reasoned?In post 1098, Zdenek wrote:Well, I ISO'ed Stubbs. He could be scum, I find his pushes somewhat opportunistic and voting choices poorly reasoned, but it's tricky because he could just be new-town trying hard, which could produce the same effect.
So you would consider posting at least something.In post 1109, dramonic wrote:More importantly, why the fuck has everyone jumped on me? <_<
I dunno, might have something to do with the fact you haven't done fuckall since RVS?In post 1109, dramonic wrote:More importantly, why the fuck has everyone jumped on me? <_<
Ma main man Stubbs.In post 1110, StubbsKVM wrote:So you would consider posting at least something.In post 1109, dramonic wrote:More importantly, why the fuck has everyone jumped on me? <_<
And ma main girl/man (whatever that Hydra conists of)In post 1111, Rift Adrift wrote:I dunno, might have something to do with the fact you haven't done fuckall since RVS?In post 1109, dramonic wrote:More importantly, why the fuck has everyone jumped on me? <_<
Grats, I just posted twice!In post 1110, StubbsKVM wrote:So you would consider posting at least something.In post 1109, dramonic wrote:More importantly, why the fuck has everyone jumped on me? <_<
Ironically enough you have made more effort today than you have in the entire game.In post 1115, dramonic wrote:Grats, I just posted twice!In post 1110, StubbsKVM wrote:So you would consider posting at least something.In post 1109, dramonic wrote:More importantly, why the fuck has everyone jumped on me? <_<
good point. Not considering unvoting yet though. Maybe you should post some more of that crap.In post 1115, dramonic wrote:Grats, I just posted twice!In post 1110, StubbsKVM wrote:So you would consider posting at least something.In post 1109, dramonic wrote:More importantly, why the fuck has everyone jumped on me? <_<
In post 1106, PeregrineV wrote:Serene (3)- orcinus_theoriginal, Ankamius, TheIrishPope
Shadi1337 (2)- T S O, BROseidon
I don't mind caution, as long as it doesn't turn into a Burden of Proficiency case.In post 983, Rift Adrift wrote: Don't be too complacent about bulba.
All I've ever asked for is that you ISO both Mac and ourselves and give some analysis. You have refused to do so and are trying to dodge the issue by misrepping the entirety of our position. I don't think asking for actual analysis is too much, unless it interferes with you wanting to stay on the sidelines and only throw out crap reads.In post 1005, Serene wrote: its a gut read based mostly on Macs replace out. i never pretended it was more than that, but the fact that bulba acts like i put together some huge case that he deftly refuted is flat out wrong. its a gut feeling and i never said otherwise.
If you think that asking for actual gameplay analysis is scummy, this might not be your game. May I suggest Snakes and Ladders?In post 1036, Rift Adrift wrote: I actually find the extreme pushes for individual reads RIGHT NOW NO EXCUSES to be kinda opportunistic. I'm mostly concerned about bulbafenrix doing this yesterday.
Probably because you're active lurking and only appear when someone is voting or suspecting you.In post 1109, dramonic wrote:More importantly, why the fuck has everyone jumped on me? <_<
In post 983, Rift Adrift wrote:Don't be too complacent about bulba. My first game with him. http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=27049 Night kill cardflips weren't revealed, so town didn't know when we'd hit our last possible day to pull out a win.In post 981, BROseidon wrote:Bulba can join the town pile for now for 832. His reads seem genuine, like they come from reading the thread instead of just sheeping consensus.
He won at endgame as SK. He was thought to be town by most players, including the mafia.
Crap.In post 1123, Bulbazak wrote:I don't mind caution, as long as it doesn't turn into a Burden of Proficiency case.In post 983, Rift Adrift wrote: Don't be too complacent about bulba.
All I've ever asked for is that you ISO both Mac and ourselves and give some analysis. You have refused to do so and are trying to dodge the issue by misrepping the entirety of our position. I don't think asking for actual analysis is too much, unless it interferes with you wanting to stay on the sidelines and only throw out crap reads.In post 1005, Serene wrote: its a gut read based mostly on Macs replace out. i never pretended it was more than that, but the fact that bulba acts like i put together some huge case that he deftly refuted is flat out wrong. its a gut feeling and i never said otherwise.
If you think that asking for actual gameplay analysis is scummy, this might not be your game. May I suggest Snakes and Ladders?In post 1036, Rift Adrift wrote: I actually find the extreme pushes for individual reads RIGHT NOW NO EXCUSES to be kinda opportunistic. I'm mostly concerned about bulbafenrix doing this yesterday.
Probably because you're active lurking and only appear when someone is voting or suspecting you.In post 1109, dramonic wrote:More importantly, why the fuck has everyone jumped on me? <_<
-Bulba