Khan calls me out for speculating on the setup. If he thought it was scummy for me to speculate, why did he not call out the others that were setup speculating? Ergo I'm questioning why he found my setup speculation to be scummy and trying to determine if he's being honest.In post 3967, Bulbazak wrote:Let's look at them side by side:In post 3833, Nero Cain wrote:
It was the same question. I asked KK why he wasn't looking at the others (note one of those others flipped scum) AK asked my why I wasn't looking at Bacde. It was the same thing and you pretending like it wasn't is massively stupid. This is scum with Nacho.
It's all about the wording with your post. You are not asking about Khan's criteria for questioning you. You are instead asking him why he's not questioning 3 other players. Look at how you phrase it: "Why is this a sin for me but not them?", with "sin" being the key word. You are hereby implying that Slaandar, Bacde, and myself should also be considered scummy and that Khan should look at us. You then follow this up with "Why am I not on your town list?", AKA "Why do you not think I am town? I should have town points from you, especially given the scummy people I just handed to you.". Compare this to Kitty's post, who you also diverted attention to in a like manner:In post 2596, Nero Cain wrote:Its a 24 player game an current site meta suggest more than 1 killing faction. 6 scum seems the ideal number, weather its a 5 man scum team and a sk or two 3 man scum teams.In post 2583, Kublai Khan wrote:In post 2401, Nero Cain wrote:its also likely multiball
How in the world can town make this assumption on Day 1?
But all of Slandaar, Bcade and Bulb have speculated that its multiball as well. Why is this a sin for me but not them?
+ why am I not on your town list?
Her focus is not on being proved townie, it is about you and your criteria. When she asks about Bacde, she is not trying to divert attention to him. Instead, she is asking about your criteria for your scumtell, which seems to be opportunistic. You are the focus of that last sentence, not Bacde, whereas Khan was not the subject of your post. Also, your entire post was on that one subject, whereas this question to you made up only a small part of Kitty's post. Here's the rest:In post 799, Amethyst Kitty wrote:
@Nero:
4/13 - I don't see it as a huge wagon. You are flipping out over stupid shit. You are trying to sling mud yet you don't call out Bacade for his 5th vote ON Nacho?
The question we've been discussing is bolded. She's clearly not sweating your attack on her, and given the context, this confirms her question being about your criteria, instead of diverting attention elsewhere. In fact, this post shows that she is clearly scumhunting. It reminds me why I was townreading her early in the game.
This should be interesting. Do explain.In post 3845, Nero Cain wrote:I might be ok with an AK lynch, but if AK flips scum we are deff killing Bulb.
I call out Mara/Mala whomever out on their 4th vote on Nacho. She says "hey, why didn't you call out Bacde?"
Even though they are worded differently they are still the same question and the fact the you are trying so hard to make it out to be different is extremely discomforting.
A lot of this is just assumptions. Like your whole "the reason Nero asked Khan why Khan wasn't townreading him is 'cause Nero expected town points for pointing out that others were speculating on the setup." And your whole "Nero's focus was to get town read." Just WTF?
Lets talk about context here. When AK questioned me as to why I suspect them but not Bacde, his vote wasn't even the fifth vote? Why do you think its townish of her to deflect to a vote that wasn't actually there?
The fact that AK has a good chance of getting lynched today and you are defending her so so so hard is making alarm bells ring.
Yep, my bad. The slot is obvious town 'cause scum NEVER replace out.In post 3996, Nachomamma8 wrote:Seems pretty trutful to me considering he ended up replacing out not too long after.In post 3854, Nero Cain wrote:I'm relatively certain that I wasn't. Though I did find it scummy when he claimed he was way back on page 3. That looked like some hardcore stalling.
null with a scum leanIn post 3997, Nachomamma8 wrote:Nero, what is your read on Arc?
yeah 'cause Mastin would so totally troll us by naming a team when there's no point to do so unless there's more than one team.In post 4074, Amethyst Kitty wrote:We also don't know if there's a red scum team or if its just a SK
Yeah 'cause those 2 extra lynches via kill sure wouldn't help town at all. Its not the first time I've been willing to leash a scum (sk?) killing power. Thad is obviously lying/trolling about being a neighbor AND a vig. That last line is fucking horrible.In post 4102, CrashTextDummie wrote:Nero Cain's stance on ThAd is just as bad. He flat out stated that he thought ThAd was scum, but that he should be kept around "because he could be useful". From a town-perspective, I can't follow this reasoning at all; if you think someone is scum, you lynch them. An additional killing role has just as much or even more of a potential to further devastate the town than it has to be "useful", and if you actually think the player in question is scum there's no reason to believe that their actions are going to be in town's favor.
Nero-scum knows if ThAd is going to be useful to him based on the people he expressed a willingness to shoot. It's exactly the kind of stance scum would want to take if they're not aligned with the people in the crosshair. Keeping ThAd lynchable ("I think he is scum") while letting him do your dirty work. Unlike every other person who's waffled on ThAd,he doesn't want to keep him alive so he can prove his claim or because he actually believes the claim, but simply so he can be "useful".
What is YOUR Thad read?
<<< Double-post deleted. I would advise you to think about what factors are present whenever you do double-post, to see if you can isolate your problem and eliminate it. >>>
