@champinoman:
I'm glad to see his paranoia is finally dispersing. These reads are way better than the ones on page 3. (I really should make a table with everyone's reads so we can compare them easily).
I have a question, in regards to Antagon:
The opportunistic jump across onto Nacho at the time looked to me like nothing more than the standard play.
Standard play for what?
Oh, and to add to champino's statement: Antagon has held the same level of involvement pretty much regardless of the number of votes on him. Is it normal for town to be this apathetic before lynch? From what I know, D1 lynches should be at least informative, if not getting us rid of mafia. What information are we going to get from Antagon if he flips town? Sure, we can reinspect D1 and see what he said, knowing he's clear, but would that even get us anywhere? I think a townsided player would try to share as much information as possible to at least guide us a little bit in D2. Antagon's denial of any further information is IMO a new scum read.
@Antagon:
In post 287, Antagon wrote:Wait, what? Why did you explicitly say that "Antagon is scummy as fuck and should be lynched" so that you would suddenly change to championman?
As town, the only reason you would suddenly change your reads on a dime is to avoid being accused of tunneling. That is not the case. Before Nacho's long absence, he did not say that I was scum and should be lynched.
Why is Nacho suddenly distancing from my wagon?
Because I'm town and he knows it.
Who else would make a wall post to say "Antagon is scum" and not vote for him? Who would jump to someone completely unrelated? Someone who knows that I will flip town and wants to ensure that he doesn't get credit for my lynch by not being on my wagon. a.k.a. scum.
I think this is a little myopic. Nachomamma was doing ISO's at that point and posting reads one by one. He was focused on you, then suddenly noticed something alarming about champinoman and reacted immediately.
@Feel It:
Okay, I admit I was sort of occupied last few days (boyfriend being home and stuff) so I mostly scanned posts straight in a line, which is why I wasn't quite sure what was going on there. It's pretty obvious however if one reads Feel It's posts in isolation.
In post 208, Feel It wrote:Okay then, giving intent to hammer Nacho, I want to see what he has to say.
In post 211, Feel It wrote:What are you doing? You've changed your vote a hundred times we had enough pressure to get a real response out of nacho.
In post 226, Feel It wrote:Implications everywhere. I'm not voting for him because I have a slight preference for the Antagon lynch, it's not an issue of getting my hands dirty.
In post 229, Feel It wrote:I gave intent (which is a lot different than actually hammering him) because I'm also willing to lynch Nacho. Like I said I'd prefer Antagon but Nacho hasn't been very town either.
So basically, while voting Antagon, he threatens to hammer Nacho, gets upset when Generic changes from Nacho to Antagon (but he himself doesn't change) and explains it with preferring Antagon. This is his explanation:
In post 273, Feel It wrote:I wasn't going to hammer him, I gave intent because he was gone and I wanted to pressure and draw him out, but then you changed your vote again which made it null. If I had then changed my vote to nacho it would be me losing pressure on the guy I'd prefer lynched (Antagon.)
Um, no, maths says the votes would be the same like in the beginning (3 on each, plus one), except you wouldn't have the hammer, therefore you wouldn't decide the lynch.
I don't think the "talk or die" intimidation explanation clicks quite well. Any sane person who cares about the game would talk long before hammered. If they don't, then they are simply AFK. Besides, you aren't the only person who can potentially hammer Nacho. Further still, if Antagon was a stronger suspect, why the hell are you upset when Generic stacks the vote pile on him? Pressure, right?
I'm not sure if I should see this as subtle opportunism, or as conformism to others' opinion (i.e. they all think Nacho is scummy, hell he has to be). The first is I think null, the second is scummy - the mafia would always want to hide amidst the crowd, and then justify their actions with crowd psychology. Nonetheless, this was murky.