In post 1501, Cephrir wrote:spending four hours on something to be told your product is worthless is really demoralizing
It's part of the game, unfortunately.
In post 1514, Rift Adrift wrote:One of the reasons I kept Cephrir in my scumpile for much of the amnesiac game (while I was in it and afterwards) was because his posts came off as hedgy to me. Another reason was that the posts also came off as a little wordsmithed. And the final reason was his first post after day 2 started because I want to lynch cheerleading/reverse cheerleading with fire every time I see it.
Taking a closer look at Cephrir is officially on my to do list.
Why do you think that we're scummy?
In post 1609, ProHawk wrote:
Lets see... you have BRO who unvoted, didn't re-vote despite having other scum-leads, said he was going to read the thread to get a better idea of who to go for... starts fishing around to see exactly how many masons there are which he subsequently gets heat for, then splits to return five days past the point of where he said he was going to re-evaluate the thread with no re-evaluating done... and no, he at least wasn't too busy to be active on-site, so what exactly isn't scummy about that?
Why are you interacting solely with BulbaFenix?
I didn't like them when I read them; his scum/town list feels empty, and I don't like that he tried to appeal to us/work with us before jumping on the "oh calcifer is scum wagon".
I'm leaning more town. I liked his push on ProHawk in particular, and plan on exploring the hell out of that avenue in a moment.
In post 1661, Ankamius wrote:VOTE: Calcifer
I'm getting those weird vibes almost half the time he posts now. I would post an actual case, but I'm not interested in having to read another ten damn pages of virtually nothing while I make it.
You could make a case without reading those 10 pages. ISOs are a beautiful thing.
In post 1688, KingCrabd wrote:Also WTF was that "deadline is approaching quickly" shit. Did he mean to post that somewhere else, perhaps? Scum might have daychat, not sure, is Encryptor defined as normal?
Somehow, I think it's incredibly unlikely for Brian to fuck up posting in a quicktopic and in a thread.
In post 1830, KingCrabd wrote:Well, to be fair, I expected pope to follow right along. It's what he does.
Shadi sheeping us is a bit more off, but whatever.
Why did you use the word "us"?
