Newbie 1388 Nexlexia Game Over

Titus · Post Post #850 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:15 pm

I was posting my opinions on the alleged lurkers Dr. Pepper, not yours.

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #851 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:50 pm

I am working this afternoon. Hopefully, it should be a quiet shift. If it is, I will be posting in this game then. If not, I can't guarantee that marathon weekend won't continue to distract me but I will try.

Bicephalous Bob · Post Post #852 (ISO) » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:15 am

In post 831, JKMatthews wrote:
In post 827, Titus wrote:
I never really considered my language as overly formal. However, if y'all do see it that way
, then I do understand why you'd find that suspicious. I consider my speech as the normal way I talk. Feel free to read my ISO in this one and compare it to other games on the site where I am confirmed town (EX: Newbie 1372). You'll find they match.

Also, again with the overthinking. The alleged scum read seems to change on a dime. First, I'm not doing scumhunting at all. Then, I'm overanalyzing. Scum have a huge problem with analyzing at all, but I'm scummy for overanalyzing? This is clearly shifting sands for convenience.
Alarm bells! This game is doing my head in.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Titus

Yeah, jokes are confusing.

NS, could you respond to this?

Nobody Special · Post Post #853 (ISO) » Sat Jul 06, 2013 8:14 am

In post 790, Bicephalous Bob wrote:
In post 766, Nobody Special wrote:
In post 740, Bicephalous Bob wrote:
In post 732, Nobody Special wrote:I wasn't at all confident that CDB would come back in a timely fashion, and wagons tend to stagnate and fall apart when not maintained.
There were no signs of the wagon falling apart. You, one of the biggest supporters of the yessirree lynch, were the first one to leave the wagon. Did you think Titus was more likely to be scum than yessirree when you changed your vote to Titus?
Yes, otherwise I wouldn't've moved my vote.
Did you think yessirree was more likely to be scum than Titus when you changed your vote back to yessirree to hammer him? What made you change your mind?

Not really, no.

I changed to Titus because I really, really,

really

wanted yessiree dead, and it didn't look like it was happening, and I was frustrated.

Bicephalous Bob · Post Post #854 (ISO) » Sat Jul 06, 2013 8:39 am

VOTE: Nobody Special

Titus · Post Post #855 (ISO) » Sat Jul 06, 2013 8:48 am

Ok y'all. A plane just crash landed in San Francisco. That's not where I live but I drive there from time to time. It has nothing to do with me and I'll be fine. If anyone knew anyone on the flight my condolences. No one seems to be hurt though. I'm responding to that because I indicated West Coast and nothing more. It's not my area but my condolences go out to the people on that flight. This is a clarification message I'm posting it in all of my games so y'all will know I'm here and fine. No one seems to be hurt, that's the important thing.

DoctorPepper · Post Post #856 (ISO) » Sat Jul 06, 2013 4:38 pm

Glad to know you're safe. Wish I knew about the other west coast scummers.

Bicephalous Bob · Post Post #857 (ISO) » Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:07 am

I agree.

In post 852, Bicephalous Bob wrote:
In post 831, JKMatthews wrote:
In post 827, Titus wrote:
I never really considered my language as overly formal. However, if y'all do see it that way
, then I do understand why you'd find that suspicious. I consider my speech as the normal way I talk. Feel free to read my ISO in this one and compare it to other games on the site where I am confirmed town (EX: Newbie 1372). You'll find they match.

Also, again with the overthinking. The alleged scum read seems to change on a dime. First, I'm not doing scumhunting at all. Then, I'm overanalyzing. Scum have a huge problem with analyzing at all, but I'm scummy for overanalyzing? This is clearly shifting sands for convenience.
Alarm bells! This game is doing my head in.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Titus
Yeah, jokes are confusing.

Just to be clear, I thought the usage of "y'all" right after talking about formality was a little joke. But Titus seems to use it every time he addresses multiple people, so I was probably wrong. I still don't understand what's scummy about it. JKM?

Pebro · Post Post #858 (ISO) » Sun Jul 07, 2013 11:43 am

Prod avoidance post. I've been busy, I'll try to post later today.

JKMatthews · Post Post #859 (ISO) » Sun Jul 07, 2013 1:00 pm

Glad to hear you're alright Titus, and I hope anyone you all know in the area is ok too.

Bob, Titus's posts tend to come across and overly formal on the most part. She'd only used "y'all" in one post before I picked her up on it and it was a "goodnight y'all" post - one that was informal and not relating to the game. Since then, she's only used it in her post about the crash landing.
The fact that as a response to me saying "you're overly formal" she uses y'all just doesn't sit well with me. It may have been a subconscious thing to try to be less formal, or it may have been a conscious effort. Either way it seems like a cheap attempt to be less formal, which I don't like...

DoctorPepper · Post Post #860 (ISO) » Sun Jul 07, 2013 2:15 pm

What troubles me more is the fact that Bob feels the need to explain everything Titus is doing >_<

Titus · Post Post #861 (ISO) » Sun Jul 07, 2013 2:22 pm

In post 859, JKMatthews wrote:Glad to hear you're alright Titus, and I hope anyone you all know in the area is ok too.

Bob, Titus's posts tend to come across and overly formal on the most part. She'd only used "y'all" in one post before I picked her up on it and it was a "goodnight y'all" post - one that was informal and not relating to the game. Since then, she's only used it in her post about the crash landing.
The fact that as a response to me saying "you're overly formal" she uses y'all just doesn't sit well with me. It may have been a subconscious thing to try to be less formal, or it may have been a conscious effort. Either way it seems like a cheap attempt to be less formal, which I don't like...

I generally speak using y'all when addressing a group of people. It's not a cheap attempt at anything. That post about the crash landing was meant as a "real life issue post" and not meant as part of the game and shouldn't be analyzed as such. So yeah, I know that's going to make me look more scummy for using y'all less but frankly I don't care. I'll talk how I talk. When I say overly formal, it's a total shift in tone from town play. Compare me to Newbie 1372, you'll see my language is the same.

JKMatthews · Post Post #862 (ISO) » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:56 pm

Yeah I didn't mean to use it as game analysis, but I couldn't truthfully say "Titus has only said y'all once the whole game"...
Searching your ISO for "y'all" shows that you don't actually say it in the game though... that's my issue. I doubt the way you talk out loud replicated the way you type your arguments on here, so the use of y'all seemed strange to me. It's not exactly proof though, don't really feel like it warrants this much discussion.
The Bob/Titus link really is just too strong to ignore though...

Pebro · Post Post #863 (ISO) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:20 am

@mod, could you prod CDB and bacde.

If CDB doesn't get back in a few days. By then basically have filled a day with 'sorry, will post content later', is anyone up for trying our luck with a CDB lynch?

Bicephalous Bob · Post Post #864 (ISO) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:59 am

Nobody Special wrote:
In post 790, Bicephalous Bob wrote:
In post 766, Nobody Special wrote:
In post 740, Bicephalous Bob wrote:
In post 732, Nobody Special wrote:I wasn't at all confident that CDB would come back in a timely fashion, and wagons tend to stagnate and fall apart when not maintained.
There were no signs of the wagon falling apart. You, one of the biggest supporters of the yessirree lynch, were the first one to leave the wagon. Did you think Titus was more likely to be scum than yessirree when you changed your vote to Titus?
Yes, otherwise I wouldn't've moved my vote.
Did you think yessirree was more likely to be scum than Titus when you changed your vote back to yessirree to hammer him? What made you change your mind?
Not really, no.

Nobody Special hammered yessirree even though he thought Titus was more likely to be scum.

Nobody Special wrote: I changed to Titus because I really, really,
really
wanted yessiree dead, and it didn't look like it was happening, and I was frustrated.

Nobody Special voted for Titus because he wanted yessirree dead.

Nexus · Post Post #865 (ISO) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 10:29 am

Shit I've been lax. Sorry. Prods going out for Nobody Special, Bacde and CDB.

Nobody Special · Post Post #866 (ISO) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:19 pm

Way to misrep, Bob. Just because I didn't think yessiree was more likely to be scum than Titus doesn't necessarily mean that I didn't think Titus was or wasn't scum.

And I didn't vote for Titus

because

I wanted yessiree dead; the two are completely independent.

Titus · Post Post #867 (ISO) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:43 pm

In post 862, JKMatthews wrote:Yeah I didn't mean to use it as game analysis, but I couldn't truthfully say "Titus has only said y'all once the whole game"...
Searching your ISO for "y'all" shows that you don't actually say it in the game though... that's my issue. I doubt the way you talk out loud replicated the way you type your arguments on here, so the use of y'all seemed strange to me. It's not exactly proof though, don't really feel like it warrants this much discussion.
The Bob/Titus link really is just too strong to ignore though...

What Titus/Bob link? I've questioned Bob like any other player. He just seems to be agreeing with me on who the scums are. Dr. Pepper's original accusation of me was solely because I wouldn't go along with a Bob lynch (because I didn't view his question as a slip). Basically, Dr. Pepper has said scum is Titus/Bob over and over, creating that impression.

@Pebro, Beyond lurking, what is the case for Channel being scum? I'm open to revisiting Dr. Pepper/NS as scum but I'd like to be shown that one of Dr. Pepper/NS is town or that Channel is unmistakably scum.

Titus · Post Post #868 (ISO) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:44 pm

In post 866, Nobody Special wrote:Way to misrep, Bob. Just because I didn't think yessiree was more likely to be scum than Titus doesn't necessarily mean that I didn't think Titus was or wasn't scum.

And I didn't vote for Titus
because
I wanted yessiree dead; the two are completely independent.

I have a different issue with your flip. Why did you feel the wagon on yessiree was going to fall apart despite JKM being willing to hammer? The excuse about wagons falling apart if not maintained is bullcrap.

Titus · Post Post #869 (ISO) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:47 pm

In post 866, Nobody Special wrote:Way to misrep, Bob. Just because I didn't think yessiree was more likely to be scum than Titus doesn't necessarily mean that I didn't think Titus was or wasn't scum.

And I didn't vote for Titus
because
I wanted yessiree dead; the two are completely independent.

I do believe you can have two suspects and change between them Bob. That's the whole point of having two suspects. The problem is that NS doesn't really suspect me as scum because he is scum.

Nobody Special · Post Post #870 (ISO) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:50 pm

In post 868, Titus wrote:The excuse about wagons falling apart if not maintained is bullcrap.

We'll just have to agree to disagree.

DoctorPepper · Post Post #871 (ISO) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:08 pm

The link is that Boib defends you like crazy everytime you are suspected.

/inb4 Someone says hyperbole is a scum tell

Titus · Post Post #872 (ISO) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:26 pm

In post 870, Nobody Special wrote:
In post 868, Titus wrote:The excuse about wagons falling apart if not maintained is bullcrap.
We'll just have to agree to disagree.

Just what about the yessiree lynch was failing to be maintained?

Bacde · Post Post #873 (ISO) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 7:55 pm

I'm thinking NS might be scum.

I'm going to do a huge reread here, because something isn't adding up.

I definitely don't have a fully-formulated opinion yet. I need to read what has been going on without me.

Bicephalous Bob · Post Post #874 (ISO) » Tue Jul 09, 2013 2:46 am

In post 866, Nobody Special wrote:Way to misrep, Bob. Just because I didn't think yessiree was more likely to be scum than Titus doesn't necessarily mean that I didn't think Titus was or wasn't scum.

I didn't say you said Titus was scum. I just said you thought Titus was more likely to be scum than yessirree when you hammered, which is exactly what you said.