In post 424, AngryPidgeon wrote:Yes, she did:In post 288, Grimgroove wrote:Part in bold: Not true.In post 149, AngryPidgeon wrote:
P-P-edit:She really did call herself likely town for the planand then defend the plan by pointing to "experience". That is not town motivated.
The rest: Don't agree.Grim is not commenting on my alignment but soft-agrees with Venmar's 'case' on me and implies I'm blatantly misrepping events in the thread. I'm basically down to lynch that with no questions asked right now.In post 94, Amrun wrote:In fact, traditionally, such suggestions are made far more often by town
In post 524, AngryPidgeon wrote:I'm right over here when you figure this answer out for yourself.In post 473, pirate mollie wrote:also since when did I become a scum read of yours cos this is the first time I have heard about it. why aren't you asking me questions or interacting with me?
Im still not seeing any points from you other thanIn post 474, Amrun wrote:I said what he did was fucking terrible and anti-town.
-Majiffy sucks for being anti-town
-Subtly apologizing for your Majiffy vote for when he almost definitely flips town, but alas he has to go.In post 474, Amrun wrote:Even challenging someone who more people suspected (like AP's group) would have been marginally better.
You can't tell me you aren't PLing him when you CLEARLY are pretending to be PLing him. Thats scummy as balls that you would deny it on the technicality that you never used the words "PL".
This vote is dazzling, Venmar. Just sheep me on to Grimgroove, just sheeeeep.
Distance from Amrun all you want. I will remain steadfast.In post 478, Grimgroove wrote:but I don't like the way you're presenting yourself as my knight in shining armor coming to my rescue. The "blood of righteousness"-comment really made it look like that, and it comes eerily close to buddying.Who cares, hes a lurksack and hes not lynchable atm. This is a prime example of someone doing something to appear pro-town that actually has no motivation behind it.In post 479, Grimgroove wrote:Does Nobody Special know he is participating in this game?
This is really REALLY obvious guys.
In post 528, AngryPidgeon wrote:That was a joke. This is some REALLY horrifying justification for Amrun's point.In post 499, Grimgroove wrote:On the first page AngryPidgeon seemed to imply this is a game-steering trio, so it could have been all the support Majiffy thought to be needing for a succesful lynch.
Amrun's point that Majiffy expected a nice quick ML on Grim with no questions asked. Which as Wisdom points out, there really was not THAT much support for.
And even if it did go through, its freaking NIGHTLESS MOUNTAINOUS. Do you still think Majiffy would risk taking a super easy ML and not worry about potential backlash from looking anti-town and aggressively MLing someone in a game like this?
About my association with Amrun.In post 533, AngryPidgeon wrote:She already addressed this. But pretending to not read clearly makes you scum. And really I know someone who was raging and omgusy about the challenge would definitely remember reading that tidbit.In post 483, Amrun wrote:Mollie, did Majiffy tell you he was going to challenge before he did it?
But you are pretending that Majiffy was a scumread all along now, so.
Ok, first time you've been willing to say Majiffy is likely scum.In post 486, Amrun wrote:I think he expected his lovely newbie wagon just to fall into place. I find him scummy for it.
And really? Rushing out the gates with a challenge is more likely from town for obvious reasons.
I would argue he may do it as scum BECAUSE its such a strong town tell.
Rofl. Yes Majiffy is scummy for organizing a lynch on Grim which has no notable support. Just handwave that away after Wisdom points it out. And the fact that Majiffy is likely trading himself for a townie at BEST in that hypothetical scenario. Totally makes sense for him to be doing that as scum. And you explained it ONCE. Thats IT. Everything else is QQ about Majiffy ruining your game which is obviously bullshit in light of your other posting.In post 521, Amrun wrote:I have explained it, and quite thoroughly -- not in those posts, but in others which you are pretending to have read but have not.
This was not obvious at all.In post 510, Amrun wrote:Grim, yes, I now have a town read on you. Have for quite some time. Thought that was obvious.
@Grim: Burden of proof, fuck that. You are both individually scummy.
Window edit: BUT YOU WERE DEFENDING AMRUN's STANCE. YOU WERE TELLING WISDOM THAT THERE WAS CREDIBLE REASON TO BELIEVE AMRUN'S THEORY RIGHT HERE:Which is so only barely peripherally relevant anyways. You are defending Amrun here lightly and now saying you weren't. WTF were you doing if not saying that Amrun's hocus-pocus had merit when she was in the process of just handwaving away Wisdom's point?In post 499, Grimgroove wrote:AngryPidgeon did.In post 494, Wisdom wrote:He didn't.
And Majiffy cannot read your QT.
Therefore, no. There were no suspicions on Grimgroove for Majiffy to count on.
And pirate_mollie didn't seem to like me very much, Majiffy confirmed they were talking about me in their QT.
On the first page AngryPidgeon seemed to imply this is a game-steering trio, so it could have been all the support Majiffy thought to be needing for a succesful lynch.
I thought it was scummy because he was using an associative tell to paint me off as scummy, without having seen either of us flip. And that was all he had on me. This was his case.
Nobody Special I think is town, his last post seemed genuine enough to me. Instead of pointing to a random other person in the other lynchpool and try tog et this person lynched instead of himself,h e admits to not having any clear reads. I can relate.
Venmar, well, I'd love to see his case. He seemed tob e trolling for a long time,b ut his challenge puts this in a new light. My gut tells me he's town though.
My strongest scumreads right now are Amrun, Elyse and AngryPidgeon. Those three are followed by SafetyDance and enomis.
