Newbie 1388 Nexlexia Game Over

Titus · Post Post #900 (ISO) » Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:35 pm

Look I'm going to go to bed, but you seem really lynch happy. You've said you're fine to lynch me, NS, Channel or Bacde at least. Now, I know there cannot be four scums. I'm beginning to severely question my town read on you but that would leave me with too many scums.

VOTE: unvote

I'm not sure what I want to do but I know I can come back to this in the morning. Hopefully Bacde would have posted his analysis by then.

Nobody Special · Post Post #901 (ISO) » Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:53 pm

***UNOFFICIAL Votecount***

DoctorPepper (1) -

ChannelDelibird

ChannelDelibird (2)-

Nobody Special, Pebro

Nobody Special (1)-

Bicephalous Bob

Titus (2)-

DoctorPepper, JKMatthews

Not voting (2)-

Bacde, Titus

With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch. Deadline is at 6pm BST on 12th July 2013.

(I was impatient. Sorry, Nexus.)

JKMatthews · Post Post #902 (ISO) » Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:37 pm

Well I obviously don't think you're all scum, you're all just in the "would be ok to see lynched list". This game requires having a flexible world view, and so I'm not going to sit here amongst a bunch of scummy players and say "I have to choose 2 I think are scum".

NS - seems silly to yet again be asking you, but anything to say that isn't a direct response to accusations towards you or essentially prod-dodging?

Nobody Special · Post Post #903 (ISO) » Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:39 pm

I wish CDB would engage more (note I didn't say

post more).

The more he avoids the thread the more I am convinced he is scum.

I can't get a good read on Titus. Every time I'm convinced she's scum, she makes a townpost. Then when I'm happy calling her "perhaps town" she gets all scummy. I hate that.

I'm getting rather bored of this day, and would like it to be over. If anyone thinks that's a scummy thing to say, so be it. This day is dragging on like nothing I've seen before. Scum are probably just in ecstasy.

DoctorPepper · Post Post #904 (ISO) » Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:25 pm

Im pretty bored of this day.
CDB says the end of Marathon weekend will be the time he posts, yet he isnt here. While he posts on all his other games.

Titus then calls out CDB after saying its scummy of me to call out CDB.

Plus the Bob-Titus link is too damning. Anyway, this day sucks cause not everyone is participating

JKMatthews · Post Post #905 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:10 am

I agree with all of the above... shall we lynch CDB?

Bicephalous Bob · Post Post #906 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 2:03 am

No, I'm really curious about the reads of his replacement.

Mod: Please replace CDB.

Titus · Post Post #907 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 3:51 am

In post 904, DoctorPepper wrote:Im pretty bored of this day.
CDB says the end of Marathon weekend will be the time he posts, yet he isnt here. While he posts on all his other games.

Titus then calls out CDB after saying its scummy of me to call out CDB.

Plus the Bob-Titus link is too damning. Anyway, this day sucks cause not everyone is participating

Where/what is the context for this? I've always said lurking by itself isn't scummy. It's suspicious sure but not necessarily scummy.

Again, you are implanting a link that doesn't exist Dr. Pepper. The link is you and NS, you just passed right over him again.

Bob, I don't think we can get a replacement for Channel to be up to speed by the end of the day. That seems like stalling.

Bicephalous Bob · Post Post #908 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 5:25 am

My point is that we'll have a big pile of confirmed town/scum posts if we lynch someone who has actually said something of value the last two weeks. I think we should refrain from lynching CDB today not because he's lurking, but because we know his account will stop lurking when day 3 starts. We can then lynch the replacement if he isn't townish and we'll actually learn something from his death.

Besides, a new player might get things rolling again.

Bacde · Post Post #909 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:52 am

In post 908, Bicephalous Bob wrote:My point is that we'll have a big pile of confirmed town/scum posts if we lynch someone who has actually said something of value the last two weeks. I think we should refrain from lynching CDB today not because he's lurking, but because we know his account will stop lurking when day 3 starts. We can then lynch the replacement if he isn't townish and we'll actually learn something from his death.

Besides, a new player might get things rolling again.

I can't help but feel like this is a scumpost

I don't understand why this argument holds for CDB's slot, but not any slot that you might want replaced?

Bacde · Post Post #910 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:52 am

Is anyone here getting town vibes from Pebro?

Nobody Special · Post Post #911 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:30 am

Pebro who? (I'm too busy doing a threeway tunnel.)

Bacde · Post Post #912 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:32 am

I dunno man

I still feel like we should have lynched gene for his "that won't work on me comment" on like p2

and Pebro hasn't really made me feel better about his slot

Titus · Post Post #913 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:42 am

@Bacde as player - You're getting town vibes from Pebro but you're saying we should have lynched Gene. Yet, Gene is Pebro, so I'm a little confused here.

@Bacde as IC - Does this setup call for lynching no matter what? What is the proper response when the group won't lynch your scum targets but you'd be standing in the way of a lynch entirely?

Pebro · Post Post #914 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:53 am

In post 909, Bacde wrote:
In post 908, Bicephalous Bob wrote:My point is that we'll have a big pile of confirmed town/scum posts if we lynch someone who has actually said something of value the last two weeks. I think we should refrain from lynching CDB today not because he's lurking, but because we know his account will stop lurking when day 3 starts. We can then lynch the replacement if he isn't townish and we'll actually learn something from his death.

Besides, a new player might get things rolling again.
I can't help but feel like this is a scumpost

I don't understand why this argument holds for CDB's slot, but not any slot that you might want replaced?

I actually think it's a good idea CDB is close to the replacement deadline and a new face might be good. CDB didn't have a lot of interaction, so there wouldn't be a lot of information. I'd like inactive CDB gone, if a replacement fixes that or CDB suddenly catches up, fine with me.

JKMatthews wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Titus

Not "I agree with your logic", but "I don't like this but I'll do it because of the site"... This is the ultimate not taking any responsibility for the vote.
And the last sentence is just trying to appear town...

I agree, first harping on wanting to get proof CDB is scum and hating policy lynches, and then he sneaks a vote in on 'lurker' CDB.

Unvote CDB
Vote Titus

Titus wrote:@Bacde as player - You're getting town vibes from Pebro but you're saying we should have lynched Gene. Yet, Gene is Pebro, so I'm a little confused here.

He asks if others find me town, he finds me scummy.

Nobody Special · Post Post #915 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:56 am

Pebro: Are you town?

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #916 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:59 am

Not flaking out not flaking out not flaking out

Fuck the reread. I'm just going to play from now and fill in when I can. The scum must be being scummy now. I'm on it.

Bacde · Post Post #917 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:07 am

CDB what is your read on Pebro

Pebro · Post Post #918 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:08 am

In post 915, Nobody Special wrote:Pebro: Are you town?

Yes, you?

Bicephalous Bob · Post Post #919 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:11 am

In post 909, Bacde wrote:
In post 908, Bicephalous Bob wrote:My point is that we'll have a big pile of confirmed town/scum posts if we lynch someone who has actually said something of value the last two weeks. I think we should refrain from lynching CDB today not because he's lurking, but because we know his account will stop lurking when day 3 starts. We can then lynch the replacement if he isn't townish and we'll actually learn something from his death.

Besides, a new player might get things rolling again.
I can't help but feel like this is a scumpost

I don't understand why this argument holds for CDB's slot, but not any slot that you might want replaced?

I thought CDB was prodded three days ago, so I figured he'd be replaced no matter what. My argument for not lynching CDB today would've made sense in that case.

Bacde · Post Post #920 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:12 am

In post 919, Bicephalous Bob wrote:
In post 909, Bacde wrote:
In post 908, Bicephalous Bob wrote:My point is that we'll have a big pile of confirmed town/scum posts if we lynch someone who has actually said something of value the last two weeks. I think we should refrain from lynching CDB today not because he's lurking, but because we know his account will stop lurking when day 3 starts. We can then lynch the replacement if he isn't townish and we'll actually learn something from his death.

Besides, a new player might get things rolling again.
I can't help but feel like this is a scumpost

I don't understand why this argument holds for CDB's slot, but not any slot that you might want replaced?
I thought CDB was prodded three days ago, so I figured he'd be replaced no matter what. My argument for not lynching CDB today would've made sense in that case.

Which lurker would you have preferred to lynch?

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #921 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:14 am

In post 917, Bacde wrote:CDB what is your read on Pebro

When last I checked he was town. I'm on shift at the moment so will read over the last handful of pages when I'm done to reacquaint myself and check if I've missed anything.

DoctorPepper · Post Post #922 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:23 am

In post 907, Titus wrote:
In post 904, DoctorPepper wrote:Im pretty bored of this day.
CDB says the end of Marathon weekend will be the time he posts, yet he isnt here. While he posts on all his other games.

Titus then calls out CDB after saying its scummy of me to call out CDB.

Plus the Bob-Titus link is too damning. Anyway, this day sucks cause not everyone is participating
Where/what is the context for this? I've always said lurking by itself isn't scummy. It's suspicious sure but not necessarily scummy.

Again, you are implanting a link that doesn't exist Dr. Pepper. The link is you and NS, you just passed right over him again.

Bob, I don't think we can get a replacement for Channel to be up to speed by the end of the day. That seems like stalling.

This is hypocritical as fuck.

You claim there in a link between me and NS, yet you deny the blatant buddying you and Bob have. Evidence: Bob sheeps your vote, Bob defends you all the time, You defend Bob as well and you were coaching him early day 1

DoctorPepper · Post Post #923 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:27 am

BTW Titus that Bacde misrep was just too damn obvious.

Also Bob's call for a replacement, seems like a saving grace for CDB if CDB is his buddy. This theory works if Bob and CDB are partners

Titus · Post Post #924 (ISO) » Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:28 am

Bob hasn't sheeped my votes. I haven't been coaching Bob at all. Your premise that I've been coaching Bob naturally depends on your conclusion being accurate which is circular reasoning. Also, this allegation of my "coaching" him early day 1 is ludicrious. I wasn't even in the game early day 1. Rikablue was in the game early day 1. In fact, he was voting for Bob.

@Pebro - I wasn't hiding my vote at all. I put it out there with my reason.

@Bacde - You missed my question for you as the IC in post 913.