Newbie 1388 Nexlexia Game Over

[Titus]

BTW Titus that Bacde misrep was just too damn obvious.

Also Bob's call for a replacement, seems like a saving grace for CDB if CDB is his buddy. This theory works if Bob and CDB are partners

What misrep are you talking about? I never misrepped him. Again, this is another random accusation.

[DoctorPepper]

Is anyone here getting town vibes from Pebro?

@Bacde as player - Y

ou're getting town vibes from Pebro but you're saying we should have lynched Gene.

Yet, Gene is Pebro, so I'm a little confused here.

@Bacde as IC - Does this setup call for lynching no matter what? What is the proper response when the group won't lynch your scum targets but you'd be standing in the way of a lynch entirely?

I dunno man

I still feel like we should have lynched gene for his "that won't work on me comment"

on like p2

and Pebro hasn't really made me feel better about his slot

If I even had to point it out...

Lynch thbis pleas kthnx

[Titus]

Yeah, 910 said to me that Bacde was getting town vibes from Pebro. Post 913 is saying that Bacde isn't feeling better about Pebro's slot as town. That's how I read it. So I asked the question because I was confused.

[DoctorPepper]

Di he say he was getting town vibes?

[Titus]

That's what the posts said to me, so I asked for clarification. It's not a misrep when you ask for clarification. He could easily say what you're saying now, that I misinterpreted him.

[Nobody Special]

Pebro: Are you town?

Yes, you?

Yes.

Thanks for answering.

[Pebro]

Only 6 more players to confirm.

@Pebro - I wasn't hiding my vote at all. I put it out there with my reason.

You didn't have a real reason. Just that the 'website' wants to lynch CDB and then you vote..

[Nobody Special]

@Mod: Please tell me if this countdown is accurate:

Deadline: (expired on 2013-07-12 12:59:57)


If so, we've got less than TWO DAYS to decide on a lynch.

I am happy lynching any of the following:

CDB
Titus
Bob

I will begrudgingly vote anyone NOT on that list to avoid a no-lynch. But I will not be happy.

[Titus]

Only 6 more players to confirm what? Is that meant for this thread?

Yeah, and I admit it wasn't a strong reason Pebro. Yet, if it came down to it, I figured site meta would at least want the information from a lynch. I wasn't sure what to do in that situation, so I figured I wasn't going to be stubborn and bullheaded at expense of the group.

Basically, it's just the reason NS did here.

[DoctorPepper]

Only 6 more players to confirm.

@Pebro - I wasn't hiding my vote at all. I put it out there with my reason.

You didn't have a real reason. Just that the 'website' wants to lynch CDB and then you vote..

Anyone notice why this is scummy, scummy as fuck kind of scummy? Titus said she doesnt want days to end prematurely, then she says its site meta to want a lynch. If she really wanted to uphold this standard, then she'd actually vote CDB when the day is almost over, not with 2 days left. Ergo, the vote is opportunistic

[Titus]

Look, there was no investigation ongoing at the time. Everyone had left. No investigation = the day has pretty much ended. I even asked if anyone had any additional avenues to go down to investigate and they should post them to make sure I wasn't acting premature at all. Way for misrep.

[Nobody Special]

You're just like a slippery little snake, trying to twist your way out of anything that comes at you. Ugh.

unvote

Vote: Titus

[DoctorPepper]

Look, there was no investigation ongoing at the time. Everyone had left.

No investigation = the day has pretty much ended

. I even asked if anyone had any additional avenues to go down to investigate and they should post them to make sure I wasn't acting premature at all. Way for misrep.

Wait, wait. What the actual fuck.

Yesterday it wasn't okay because there could have been investigations
Now it is because there wasnt any more investigations, therefore the day had ended.

This is wrong on so many levels.

1. Pretty much everyone agreed yesterday, yessirree was going to die. What more could you go for? Hunting for more people
2. Today there is nothing more to investigate? Why? You just settled on CDB. There were other lurkers, only 3 people were actively posting and yet somehow, there was enough investigations? What?
3. Even if there were enough investigations today, what makes it so different from yesterday.
4. If you think Im scum, then why not continue the investigation?
5. What is your standard for the day being okay to end?

[DoctorPepper]

You're just like a slippery little snake, trying to twist your way out of anything that comes at you. Ugh.

unvote

Vote: Titus

Good vote

[Titus]

1. Absolutely, you can hunt for the second scum partner.
2. There was nothing more to investigate because everyone seemed rigid in who they thought were scum.
3. I was still investigating and there was more time on the clock.
4. I'm convinced your scum, but I'm also convinced that I won't get enough people to agree with me in the time allotted.
5. The standard is when no one is investigating anymore, everyone (who is active) seems firm in their scum opinions, and people want the day to end.

[DoctorPepper]

1. Absolutely, you can hunt for the second scum partner.
2. There was nothing more to investigate because everyone seemed rigid in who they thought were scum.
3. I was still investigating and there was more time on the clock.
4. I'm convinced your scum, but I'm also convinced that I won't get enough people to agree with me in the time allotted.
5. The standard is when no one is investigating anymore, everyone (who is active) seems firm in their scum opinions, and people want the day to end.

1. Why couldnt you hunt for the partner now?
2. Why was there nothing more to investigate? Because people had their minds set? People had their minds set on yessirree too now, didnt we
3. There is still time on the clock now. So this contradicts your entire reason. You say JK and NS ended the day early for everyone to discuss, because they felt like they couldn't discuss anything. You say this is scummy. Later, you say that you had no more to discuss, ergo its okay to end the day early, right? So If you're not okay with ending the day early, then its scummy. If you are, then its not and you dont give a fuck whether or not this town discusses or not. Double standard much?
4. Why not use the time to convince people instead of lynching someone who you aren't really sure of being scum?
5. So nobody was investigating anyone today? Really?

[Titus]

1. I am already convinced you and NS are scum. So what partner would I be hunting for?
2. I didn't. I thought the lynch on yessiree might have been a bad idea at the end of the day.
3. There's technically time on the clock if we wait until the last second. Still there's not a lot left for the purpose of this site given we are only required to post once every two days. The players who were active had appeared to make up their minds.
4. The chat was dead. I can't convince people just by posting the same damn thing over and over with myself.
5. That's a total misrep. You asked for the standard to end the day. That's when no one is investigating anymore that day. I don't know where you got that from.

[DoctorPepper]

1. Then why vote CDB then??
2. Why dont you think the CDB lynch is a bad idea now?
3. This never andwered my post
4. Was it dead? It could be when only 3 people were active. So why not wait for everyone else?
5. The problem here is that the whole day you were complaining about how the day being ended early was scummy as fuck yet you wanted to end it by your standard. The day was okay with most of the people yesterday, except you. Now, the day was given your "Titus-approval" and its okay for it to end, even without everyone else saying so?

If you really think im scum, vote me then. Convince people. Dont use that double standard shit in your whole "ending the day early is bad shtick" CONVINCE PEOPLE

[Titus]

1. Because of the dillema I have cited previously. If I'm stubborn, we could have no lynch at all, which means no information for the town. That's why I wanted Bacde to answer whether this site always requires a lynch.
2. Because it seems to be him or no lynch at all.
3. Yes it did. You just didn't like the answer. I've posted walls upon walls detailing why you are scum. I have to try something else to get people to see that you are indeed scum. I do care if the town discusses it, they just seemed really against discussing it. I'm not going to force people to talk about what they don't want to talk about.
4. I have no way of knowing when people will come back. A decision had to be made.
5. No... by my standard I was still investigating, so ending the day was improper. Here, no one seems to be investigating. There is no double standard.

I can change my vote to you or NS easily. I'm just not going to be a five year old and insist on getting my pony. I'm going to at least try to work together with people.

[DoctorPepper]

1. My problem is, if you really cared about that whole "Ending the day early is scummy as fuck" then you would have waited til the deadline
2. There was another wagon. Yours. Why not convince people instead of going with the flow? The problem here is that *if* you were town and you just went with the flow potentially led by scum, then you're screwed. The goal of the game is not to go follow and sheep, its to fight for who you think is scum.
3. The players who appeared made up their minds. And you couldnt wait for everyone. That was a bad answer, it was irrelevant to my point
4. A decision could have been made at the last day? BEcause not everyone had given their input yet
5. The double standard is that only you seemed to end. What about Bacde, CDB. They stopped investigating or they simply weren't posting?

If you can't even continue your pursuit, it means you've given up and you dont think I could be mislynched

[Titus]

1. I'm not going to derail the town getting a lynch at all, just to see myself be right.
2. Spending too much time defending myself is scummy. I'm also not going to convince people to vote for me. I'm not seeing where you are going with this.
3. Wait for people like Channel who never post? NS, who would never vote you because he's your scum buddy? Pebro and Bacde who haven't posted much. I had to do something to get things moving or it would have been a no lynch.
4. See response 4. This site doesn't act like my other site where decisions are made in 24 hours.
5.There is no double standard. See line three.

No. There becomes a point where continuing to argue with someone derails any investigation and turns into a he said she said style argument. I want people to see that you are scum but sometimes people just can't see it my way and I have to take another approach.

[DoctorPepper]

There is no point arguing, we're just using the same points. And you stopped making sense a long time ago. The fact is, we had time and you decided to go "welp, no one is coming, lets vote CDB cause why not, even if I'm supposedly sure of DP-NS"

Although your biggest problem is point 2. Why are you so concerned with looking scummy?

[Titus]

I'm not. But I'm not going to do something that is scummy, i.e. self voting, which is what you were suggesting I'd do by promoting my own lynch aka "going with the flow" of my own lynch. I didn't see us as having time if no one was going to be here. When I did that, folks at least came out of the woodwork.

[DoctorPepper]

2.

Spending too much time defending myself is scummy.

I'm also not going to convince people to vote for me. I'm not seeing where you are going with this.

Although your biggest problem is point 2. Why are you so concerned with looking scummy?

I'm not.

But I'm not going to do something that is scummy, i.e. self voting, which is what you were suggesting I'd do by promoting my own lynch aka "going with the flow" of my own lynch. I didn't see us as having time if no one was going to be here. When I did that, folks at least came out of the woodwork.

I never asked for you to self vote. The fact that you think you'll look scummy for defending yourself means you care about looking scummy

[Bacde]

@Bacde as IC - Does this setup call for lynching no matter what? What is the proper response when the group won't lynch your scum targets but you'd be standing in the way of a lynch entirely?

We should probably lynch today.

There was no kill last night, and its unlikely that the scum chose to no-kill. What this means is that there are 2 factions of people with extra information right now--the scum, and a town powerrole. We don't know what town powerrole that is, but no-killing gives the scum more opportunity to kill that town power role.

If the group won't lynch your scum targets, you need to either listen to the group, or work harder at convincing the group as to why your targets are scum.