In post 4880, Nero Cain wrote: In post 4875, Bulbazak wrote: In post 4872, Nero Cain wrote:Are you really suggesting that I'm scummy for doing the same thing as you I,e; lynching Slandaar?
No, I'm saying you're scum for voting Slandaar for a specific reason, then backing off of that reason while still voting Slandaar.
Pray tell well you didn't mention this yesterday? Going for a second mislynch I see.
I did mention it yesterday.
In post 4723, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 4710, Nero Cain wrote:yeah, I just did the math. 6 is only 25%. 8 is 33.33333333333%. So 8 is more likely than 6. Slandaar is prob red scum with Cephir and two of Khan/Nacho/Rena/CTD/Bacde
So blue is probs Bulb with one of CTD/Bacde/khan.
Backpedal ahoy!
Nevermind, Nero is still scum.
In post 4880, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 4872, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 4696, Nero Cain wrote:
+ there's atleast one scum in the neighborhoods and Slandaar makes a good bet. CTD might be scum afterall. He's ignoring discussing his neighborhood big time.
He uses the neighborhood spec to implicate CTD as scum should Slandaar flip town. This is essentially setting up lynches.
In post 4872, Nero Cain wrote:
I also specifically said “there’s atleast one scum in the ‘hoods.” There are 3 hoods its not like I ever said "if Slan flips town then it makes CTD scum" and I have no clue how you would get that.
In post 4872, Nero Cain wrote:
So again you seem to be buddying/defending CTD here. Just like you were doing yesterday.
Yes, I pointed out that you were setting up options for a CTD lynch yesterday while on the Slandaar wagon. I must obviously be buddying.
Yes 'cause I never said
ANYTHING
about how CTD
HAS
to be scum if Slan flips town. For a guy that likes to whine about having words put into their mouth you sure like to do it with me. I specifically stated that out of the six neighbors, I don't think that all 6 are town. I also stated that I thought that Slan was a good choice. At no point did I ever say "there is scum in the Slan/CTD 'hood" So yea, I think you are just hardcore buddying CTD here, just like you were doing yesterday.
But you heavily implied that CTD was scum if Slandaar flipped town. It's a more useful tactic when playing scum, because then when somebody brings it up, you can just say, "But I never
said
that.". It's a half-truth, and one that scum is more likely to use than town.
In post 4880, Nero Cain wrote:
How is there "no way 2 scum would be paired together"? Other than it being somewhat unlikely, its not an impossibility. But again, I never made any kind of statement that "there
HAS
to be scum in the Slan-CTD neighborhood. My suspicions with CTD had to do with him ignoring all of my questions and had nothing to do with Slan. This is also a scumslip. Bulb thought that I was suspicious of CTD ONLY 'cause of Slan and yet Bulb became suspicious of CTD after Slan flipped town. So why would town-Bulb be accusing me of being scum for something he's doing? ITT-Bulb is scum.
Again, you're relying on the semantics of your actual statement in an effort to discredit an argument based on the
intent
of your statement, which is actually important. Then you try to twist cause and effect into some malformed meaning that only you can somewhat understand, because seriously, I don't get what you're saying. That I'm scummy because being paranoid about CTD after a townflip of his neighbor is the same as being suspicious of CTD and calling him scum
while
wagoning his neighbor? They're completely different. There's a part in the back of my mind that is telling me that if we find scum from one team in the neighborhoods, that we'll find scum from the other team in the neighborhoods as well. And while a scum/scum neighborhood might be an interesting idea, it is so improbable that it is highly unlikely. Yet, you are trying to defend your actions yesterday by saying that you thought CTD was scum
while
you were trying to lynch Slandaar as scum? The 2 reads do not compute enough to exist simultaneously. With how unlikely the scum/scum neighborhood is, that should not even be entering your mind, yet you are claiming it did (Because you were not saying that CTD was scum if Slandaar was town after all...). And when I point it out, you yell out, "You're also suspicious of CTD! Hypocrisy! Hypocrisy!". However, I only became paranoid of CTD after Slandaar flipped town, and that was because of my views on the neighborhoods (i.e. if we find one scum in the neighborhoods, the other scum is likely there as well, and my PoE eliminates PV). It is not the same as you saying that CTD might be scum
while
trying to lynch his neighbor. It's quite a stretch of logic, and a scummy one at that.
In post 4880, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 4872, Nero Cain wrote:
25% seems kinda low and I was slightly onboard with 2 4-man scum teams. I also like Desp’s assessment of 7 scum.
Funny, you never said anything about that before CTD and Desperado questioned you. In fact, you jumped on Slandaar's wagon for him suggesting it. Yet when questioned about it while on the wagon, you're suddenly okay with the idea and see it as natural, the same idea that you weren't even considering a moment ago and was actually voting someone for?
Town is very much a team game. Sure, I don't 100% know that CTD and Despo are on my team but it doesn't hurt to listen. As where you "care more about your own reads". That shits going to fuck town over, if you even are town.
And 4710 is calling you a liar.
Where did the "care about your own reads" quote come from? You're now starting to make crap up to defend yourself. And I already went over 4710. It's at the top of the page, and I called it backpedaling after you first said it. And if anyone would go back and look at what was happening when you said that, they'll notice that CTD was questioning you about the percentages, after which you completely reversed your stance on it, which, btw, was your main reason for voting Slandaar. So, no, it's not calling me a liar. All it's doing is confirming everything I've said.
Can we just lynch Nero now? This is starting to get ridiculous.
