In post 1216, Desperado wrote: In post 1215, Generic wrote:Was that something noteworthy then desperado? I know in mafia everything gets analysed but that amounted to three fifths of fuck all in the end. I enquired on something mildly scummy in isolation, you countered with the reason,
I accepted that it made sense.
What mare can be gained from that?
It's more like you just dropped it until I asked you why you called my vote out if you weren't actually interested in examining the reasoning, the same way you ignored this post:
In post 1078, Desperado wrote: In post 1072, Generic wrote: In post 1070, Desperado wrote:Hey Generic...why did you call me out for my naked vote if you weren't actually interested in the motivation for it? You seriously just wanted me to say "for all of the reasons I said yesterday..." as if that wouldn't be implied in the first place?
What are your thoughts on Nexus' townread of Metal yesterday?
As I keep pointing out desperado, just because you made the points on day 1 doesn't mean I saw them. In case you hadn't noticed I was a little preoccupied on day 1 with matters of my own.
On that, I will have to have a read back, because depending on how they sound in and out of context it will either be town genuinely looking past the moronic attitude to see town tells on ms or it will have been white knighting... I shall Iso now and see what I make of it.
Yeah yeah I get that, but now you know why I was voting Nexus, and you haven't done anything with it. The conversation just sort of...ended. So why did you call me out on my vote if you didn't plan on following through once you received the information you were looking for?
In post 1073, Generic wrote:About nexus, He never goes all out on the 'MS is town' comments, they feel light and fairly genuine. Town reading town is what I would say based on those comments.
I agree that context is important, so why did you ignore the broader context of Nexus' previous treatment of "bad players?" He clearly thinks that bad = scum, and yet Metal's brand of bad was somehow town.
I think the contradiction is scum motivated. What do you think?
So you cared enough to call out my vote on Nexus and implicate me as Amrun's partner as a result, but not enough to actually discuss my read on Nexus. Why?
You really love a misrep don't you.
You naked voted. I'm supposed to assume there is a reason behind it because your laziness should spark my need to homework you?
And timing wise it came after Venmar offered two names I believe (not amrun) so naked voting immediately after that option was given and I'm supposed to know you meant something else behind it.
I had other things to hold my attention day 1, ms tunnelling the hell out of me for one. So to me yes the topic was do e because your laziness had to be redacted by a follow up explanation.
You have a paranoia issue desperado. Is that panic or do you just have no big leads and are flapping?