I meant kdub. Typing fail >.>In post 223, fferyllt wrote:My point was that AS' current vote is unsupported as well. Or is that ok, since it's on the same player you are voting?
Has AS even voted you this game?
I meant kdub. Typing fail >.>In post 223, fferyllt wrote:My point was that AS' current vote is unsupported as well. Or is that ok, since it's on the same player you are voting?
You assumed wrong. I'm looking for holes where there should be questions. And I'm trying to stretch the range of interactions a little.In post 224, goodmorning wrote:Bit self-important, ffff. I assumed you didn't bother because you didn't really think it was relevant at this point.In post 217, fferyllt wrote:So now I'm really curious why no one seemed to notice that I was pretty laid back about the claims, or cares what I actually think about them.
Besides, didn't you mention something about a game with two millers? Or was that someone else?
You seem to be sitting around waiting for data to come to you. What are your thoughts about the other claims? What did you get from the me vs gm interactions? What are your thoughts on BRO? bork?In post 199, MC RIDE wrote:I'm in limbo. Limbo sucks.In post 192, goodmorning wrote:Out of the three he's contributed the least content.In post 189, BROseidon wrote:GM why are you leaning towards letters?
That said it's giving me a bit of a headache because his claim is objectively stronger than the other two.
Come to think of it MC hasn't done much recently, but his early game stuff was quite solid.
AS has the weakest claim but unless they're faking their content they just are acting really Town.
I hope I'll see something clear from this ff vs gm
What have you got?In post 203, ArcAngel9 wrote:am still behind with this game... my reads will up by tonight
Under the radar to you, or in general?In post 207, goodmorning wrote:My read on you? Mainly it consists of the fact that you seem to fly under the radar in spectacular fashion without saying all that much of use.
I'll say it again: we are no longer in the "early" part of the day. Your backpedaling on your reasoning for your vote is quickly becoming secondary to the fact that you aren't forming any stronger reads.In post 222, BROseidon wrote:Because I should never question my early reads ever. Remember that newbie game you replaced into where my early reads were horrible and the scum ended up being in slots I read as town early? Because I sure do.
your content read is stronger than your claim read?In post 192, goodmorning wrote:Out of the three he's contributed the least content.In post 189, BROseidon wrote:GM why are you leaning towards letters?
That said it's giving me a bit of a headache because his claim is objectively stronger than the other two.
Come to think of it MC hasn't done much recently, but his early game stuff was quite solid.
AS has the weakest claim but unless they're faking their content they just are acting really Town.
How is this evidence?In post 222, BROseidon wrote:Because I should never question my early reads ever. Remember that newbie game you replaced into where my early reads were horrible and the scum ended up being in slots I read as town early? Because I sure do.
Especially given that 1/2 of the AS hydra is the person I townread and turned out to be scum >:C
In general. Why?In post 230, Kdub wrote:Under the radar to you, or in general?In post 207, goodmorning wrote:My read on you? Mainly it consists of the fact that you seem to fly under the radar in spectacular fashion without saying all that much of use.
Yes, isn't yours?In post 231, TMTOLBTWNTOF wrote:your content read is stronger than your claim read?
In post 230, Kdub wrote:I'll say it again: we are no longer in the "early" part of the day. Your backpedaling on your reasoning for your vote is quickly becoming secondary to the fact that you aren't forming any stronger reads.
This is has become stronger.In post 181, BROseidon wrote:Similar to kdub, PoE and gut. I'm starting to think that there is scum in one of GM/ffery/kdub because of the interactions after my kdub vote, with GM+either of them not being the case, although ffery/kdub would still be a possibility.
So AA9's lurking makes her town? At best it's a null tell.In post 233, BROseidon wrote: AA9's lurking doesn't really have me thinking she's scum because she did the same in HP mafia and ended up being town.
Eh, phrased it badly.In post 128, BROseidon wrote:AA9 still needs to catch up, which I think is null.
By content I mean "You're scum because you're not posting enough"In post 232, goodmorning wrote:Yes, isn't yours?In post 231, TMTOLBTWNTOF wrote:your content read is stronger than your claim read?
By "yes, isn't yours" I mean "do youIn post 237, TMTOLBTWNTOF wrote:By content I mean "You're scum because you're not posting enough"In post 232, goodmorning wrote:Yes, isn't yours?In post 231, TMTOLBTWNTOF wrote:your content read is stronger than your claim read?
VOTE: BROIn post 233, BROseidon wrote:In post 230, Kdub wrote:I'll say it again: we are no longer in the "early" part of the day. Your backpedaling on your reasoning for your vote is quickly becoming secondary to the fact that you aren't forming any stronger reads.This is has become stronger.In post 181, BROseidon wrote:Similar to kdub, PoE and gut. I'm starting to think that there is scum in one of GM/ffery/kdub because of the interactions after my kdub vote, with GM+either of them not being the case, although ffery/kdub would still be a possibility.
I also think that if one of the neg-utility claims is a fakeclaim, that it's AS. Letter's claim is almost certainly legit, although I guess he could be ascetic scum. The hated claim is probably true because it would be pretty dumb to fake claim a role that gets you policy lynched as scum. Bork's relatively low activity has me a bit concerned, but I don't have meta experience on him at all so I don't know if that's normal. AA9's lurking doesn't really have me thinking she's scum because she did the same in HP mafia and ended up being town. MC I'm having a hard time calibrating a read on.
I honestly hadn't considered an ascetic goon, but I'm still very much leaning against that, as I think it's more likely that an ascetic goon would not have advertised his role like TMT did.In post 219, fferyllt wrote:3 comes close to stretching my credulity to the breaking point.
I'm finding reasons to take all three individually at face value, so I'm a little worried that I'm missing something, but for now credulity is intact. I'm having the most difficulty articulating those reasons wrt TMT, but I can't get past having a town-sense about his posts so far.
Because I would disagree with you, especially relative to a few others players in the game.In post 232, goodmorning wrote:In general. Why?
Which part? Can you explain the specific interactions that make you think this?In post 233, BROseidon wrote:This is has become stronger.In post 181, BROseidon wrote:Similar to kdub, PoE and gut. I'm starting to think that there is scum in one of GM/ffery/kdub because of the interactions after my kdub vote, with GM+either of them not being the case, although ffery/kdub would still be a possibility.
Relative arguments from one's own point of view are hardly perspicacious.In post 241, Kdub wrote:Because I would disagree with you, especially relative to a few others players in the game.In post 232, goodmorning wrote:In general. Why?
How would you tell the difference between my trying to discern your alignment and trying to get you mislynched?In post 245, BROseidon wrote:The way GM got in ffery's way makes it look like they aren't scum together. GM was disrupting ffery's questioning of me, which would make it potentially harder for her to discern my alignment, and might throw me off and misread her. At the same time, ffery has been pretty intent on pushing me, but hasn't actually put a vote down on me. Scum pushing for a mislynch while not actually being on the lynch is fairly standard. GM being disruptive would just be disruptive town play, in that case (which happens, and threw me off my first game).
The reason why I think kdub might be scum is because of how aggressively so people turned against me after the vote. kdub has been coasting a bit without any real pressure, and when I try to apply pressure I immediately get attacked. There has to be town in there, given that ffery/AS/bork/GM all responded negatively to my attack in one way or another, but the push feels too opportunistic. Actually, I have a quick question re: this point:
AS, which of you cast the vote for kdub?
I'm in data acquisition mode. Are you asking for my reads?In post 248, borkjerfkin wrote:fferyllt I am finding I know very little about your reads sans the three claimed roles for the amount you've posted.