Micro 199 Nonsensical Narnia Day 4

goodmorning · Post Post #300 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:49 am

To claim an unspecified role at this point in the game makes my nebulous suspicion of Kdub rather greater.

@BRO: What do you mean less content that this? He's not got any content now.

fferyllt · Post Post #301 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:53 am

In post 299, BROseidon wrote:Quick metadive of letters indicates that he has almost 0 scum meta to look at (2 marathon games), although what I saw looked more content-light than this.

kdub: Cool, either you can die or we can both die, then. Sounds fun

Have you played a marathon game? It's p much impossible to post content in that format. There's no time at all for analysis and you're usually 3-4 posts behind by the time you get your post out. If you p-edit, you'll never make a post.

fferyllt · Post Post #302 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:53 am

In post 300, goodmorning wrote:To claim an unspecified role at this point in the game makes my nebulous suspicion of Kdub rather greater.

@BRO: What do you mean less content that this? He's not got any content now.

What do you make of the timing of the claim?

BROseidon · Post Post #303 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:59 am

gm: What he has here is high by his standards, imo.

Kdub · Post Post #304 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:04 am

In post 300, goodmorning wrote:To claim an unspecified role at this point in the game makes my nebulous suspicion of Kdub rather greater.

I don't think it's to the town's advantage for me to reveal more at the moment, because I would rather keep the scum in the dark as much as possible. The important thing is that my ability is provable, which is all that should be needed for you to make a decision on me today.

Subtle rolefish attempt is noted however.

fferyllt · Post Post #305 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:48 am

Bro, what do you see as the town benefit of claiming your role?

BROseidon · Post Post #306 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:50 am

That question will not be answered.

fferyllt · Post Post #307 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:59 am

In post 306, BROseidon wrote:That question will not be answered.

I take it you know that claiming is counter to the conventional wisdom about this role.

BROseidon · Post Post #308 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 9:28 am

Shhh I'm trying to work here.

BROseidon · Post Post #309 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 9:47 am

Also my venge shot only works today.

goodmorning · Post Post #310 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:59 pm

In post 302, fferyllt wrote:
In post 300, goodmorning wrote:To claim an unspecified role at this point in the game makes my nebulous suspicion of Kdub rather greater.
What do you make of the timing of the claim?

Completely random. Doesn't seem to make sense from a Town standpoint. The only reason one would claim so early is to head a lynch off at the pass. Why do that? Because it makes you look better in the future if you haven't had a million L-1 wagons run up on you. Who is concerned about appearances? Scum.

Also you said something about why would BRO venge a PR claim, but I thought Rach said somewhere that this was an all-PR game?
Just checked. She did.

In post 1, RachMarie wrote:1. This is a upick role madness game there are no VTs.

In post 304, Kdub wrote:I don't think it's to the town's advantage for me to reveal more at the moment, because I would rather keep the scum in the dark as much as possible. The important thing is that my ability is provable, which is all that should be needed for you to make a decision on me today.

Subtle rolefish attempt is noted however.

That you claim it is provable at all already implies what it is you intend to claim anyway, not that I'm asking.
The point is that I don't buy it.

goodmorning · Post Post #311 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:02 pm

Apparently deadline is 23 hours away. We should all just lynch Kdub now.

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #312 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 3:43 pm

In post 286, borkjerfkin wrote:I would think that Town!AA would read the game and read my slot instead of latching onto this gambler's fallacy thing. It's fine as a running joke in RVS but this is page 12 and she all but admitted she's suspicious of me for "I've been good as scum before" which she should not be allowed to use as a crutch to avoid actually reading me (or apparently anyone else).

are you trying to frame me bork?
I am busy till Tuesday, if you were reading you would know this.

Kdub · Post Post #313 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 3:56 pm

In post 310, goodmorning wrote:That you claim it is provable at all already implies what it is you intend to claim anyway, not that I'm asking.
The point is that I don't buy it.

In other words: "I'm not asking what your role is, I'm just going to assume it's something and then disbelieve you based on that assumption."

In post 311, goodmorning wrote:Apparently deadline is 23 hours away. We should all just lynch Kdub now.

Classic scum trying to force a quicklynch at the deadline.

Seriously, LOOK at the reasons that GM and BRO are voting me for. This is a poorly reasoned and hastily manufactured wagon.

Kdub · Post Post #314 (ISO) » Mon Jul 22, 2013 4:01 pm

Mod: Can we get a deadline extension?

ISO · Post Post #315 (ISO) » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:05 am

In post 312, ArcAngel9 wrote:are you trying to frame me bork?
I am busy till Tuesday, if you were reading you would know this.

Then maybe you should've just said that instead of throwing around suspicion at me based on NOTHING RELATED TO THIS GAME.

ISO · Post Post #316 (ISO) » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:07 am

Rach hasn't posted here in like over a week.

We should not be lynching Kdub today re: his claim. GM why do you not want a BRO lynch? Don't think I've seen you call him town.

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #317 (ISO) » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:07 am

In post 315, borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 312, ArcAngel9 wrote:are you trying to frame me bork?
I am busy till Tuesday, if you were reading you would know this.
Then maybe you should've just said that instead of throwing around suspicion at me based on NOTHING RELATED TO THIS GAME.

sit tight bork, i ll get you today. if you're scum this time..you can't run from me.

ISO · Post Post #318 (ISO) » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:08 am

In post 317, ArcAngel9 wrote:sit tight bork, i ll get you today. if you're scum this time..you can't run from me.

I'm not scum.

Which if you were actually reading you would know.

goodmorning · Post Post #319 (ISO) » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:31 am

In post 316, borkjerfkin wrote:We should not be lynching Kdub today re: his claim. GM why do you not want a BRO lynch? Don't think I've seen you call him town.

What do you mean because of his claim? I'm not in favour of leaving him alive another day just so when he can't actually prove it we lynch him then. I think he is Scum.
I mentioned earlier that I found BRO Town by PoE. I now find him Town on his own merits. He's in this game, paying attention, answering questions. His recent posts in particular have been quite Town, buoyed by his claim, the timing and content of which absolutely make sense from a bravadoing Town standpoint.

@AA9: I couldn't care less about your inactivity tbh, but what strikes me as slightly off about you here is your continual pushing of this idea that bork is Scum without you having read anything. It's almost like you're looking for a mislynch.

ISO · Post Post #320 (ISO) » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:34 am

In post 319, goodmorning wrote:What do you mean because of his claim? I'm not in favour of leaving him alive another day just so
when he can't actually prove it we lynch him then
.

Well he claimed something very specific and why are you assuming the underlined is an eventuality?

goodmorning · Post Post #321 (ISO) » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:35 am

Because he is Scum. I am therefore assuming that he doesn't have whatever PR he wants to claim to have.

fferyllt · Post Post #322 (ISO) » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:37 am

In post 320, borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 319, goodmorning wrote:What do you mean because of his claim? I'm not in favour of leaving him alive another day just so
when he can't actually prove it we lynch him then
.

Well he claimed something very specifi
c and why are you assuming the underlined is an eventuality?

I thought his claim was non-specific.

ISO · Post Post #323 (ISO) » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:38 am

In the sense that "I can do a certain thing and you should let me do that thing".

fferyllt · Post Post #324 (ISO) » Tue Jul 23, 2013 3:05 am

In post 319, goodmorning wrote:
In post 316, borkjerfkin wrote:We should not be lynching Kdub today re: his claim. GM why do you not want a BRO lynch? Don't think I've seen you call him town.
What do you mean because of his claim? I'm not in favour of leaving him alive another day just so when he can't actually prove it we lynch him then. I think he is Scum.
I mentioned earlier that I found BRO Town by PoE. I now find him Town on his own merits. He's in this game, paying attention, answering questions. His recent posts in particular have been quite Town, buoyed by his claim, the timing and content of which absolutely make sense from a bravadoing Town standpoint.

@AA9: I couldn't care less about your inactivity tbh, but what strikes me as slightly off about you here is your continual pushing of this idea that bork is Scum without you having read anything. It's almost like you're looking for a mislynch.

This post has conviction.

I'm not convinced kdub is scum, though.