ThAdmiral - 1 (Baezu)
Nero Cain - 1 (Bulbazak)
Cephrir - 1 (PeregrineV)
Seanald - 1 (penguin_alien)
Not Voting - 1 (Amethyst Kitty)
Day Four's deadline is Wednesday, July 31st, @ 12:30 PM PST, which is in (expired on 2013-07-31 12:30:00).
scum buddies don wanna bus dude.In post 5323, Human Destroyer wrote:Serious question: How isn't Bulba hammered already?
kind of all over the place there.In post 5325, mastin2 wrote:ThAdmiral - 1 (Baezu)
Nero Cain - 1 (Bulbazak)
Cephrir - 1 (PeregrineV)
Seanald - 1 (penguin_alien)
Not Voting - 1 (Amethyst Kitty)
Because I'm trying to understand your thought process. I would think there would be some line of reasoning that would allow you to reach one conclusion or the other, but you're claiming that your line of reasoning would lead to no conclusion whatsoever. Essentially, you threw something out there that would lead to, you claim, no reasonable set of conclusions. This bothers me, because you are one of the few in the game that I'm still trying to figure out what your motivation is. You were very active on d1 and were at least able to voice your reasoning for your thoughts. You dropped a little on d2, but still, you were making well crafted arguments. However, you've seemed to be coasting since then. I'm just trying to make sense of all of this, hence why I'm asking about your line of reasoning.In post 5322, Human Destroyer wrote:Yes, that tells me actually nothing about the target. I'm not sure why you're so set on the fact that it does.In post 5245, Bulbazak wrote:So you're saying that you think ThAd is lying about being the vig (i.e. scum) and is therefore lying about who he targetted, yet that tells you absolutely NOTHING about his target? I understand we're in multiball and everything, but you should still be able to come to some conclusion via PoE.
Ok Hi haylen.In post 5308, Rena wrote:ThAd, I'm Haylen. I switched accounts over 100 pages ago.
If I'm no lynched today: hey dude, if you're a town PR who blocked me, don't do that again? x.x I'm pretty sure KK targetted ThAd anyway and thats why neither of us could action.
See in you about a year then!In post 5321, Baezu wrote:/confirm
Hey All! Lemme have a chance to look at things tonight and I'll post my reads as soon as I can.
Translation: I am trying to distract you from lynching me by subtly hinting that scum-ThAd saying he targeted me means that I am town even though it is multiball and inherent WIFOM.In post 5328, Bulbazak wrote:Because I'm trying to understand your thought process. I would think there would be some line of reasoning that would allow you to reach one conclusion or the other, but you're claiming that your line of reasoning would lead to no conclusion whatsoever. Essentially, you threw something out there that would lead to, you claim, no reasonable set of conclusions. This bothers me, because you are one of the few in the game that I'm still trying to figure out what your motivation is. You were very active on d1 and were at least able to voice your reasoning for your thoughts. You dropped a little on d2, but still, you were making well crafted arguments. However, you've seemed to be coasting since then. I'm just trying to make sense of all of this, hence why I'm asking about your line of reasoning.In post 5322, Human Destroyer wrote:Yes, that tells me actually nothing about the target. I'm not sure why you're so set on the fact that it does.In post 5245, Bulbazak wrote:So you're saying that you think ThAd is lying about being the vig (i.e. scum) and is therefore lying about who he targetted, yet that tells you absolutely NOTHING about his target? I understand we're in multiball and everything, but you should still be able to come to some conclusion via PoE.
It's the loss of being transparently genuine that hurts me the most.In post 5317, Amethyst Kitty wrote:What about CTD do you not like Nacho? I still think he's town, though I don't think he's been as transparently genuine as he was earlier on in the game.
In multiball? Hell yes.In post 5317, Amethyst Kitty wrote:I also do know that genuine reads as scum isn't impossible, though is DLG the type of person to do that kind of thing?
I have him as a 10 in towniness currently.In post 5318, Amethyst Kitty wrote:also, how town do you think Bulb is?
I have alot of mixed feelings regarding him
why is bulbazak red scum?In post 5326, Seanald wrote:scum buddies don wanna bus dude.In post 5323, Human Destroyer wrote:Serious question: How isn't Bulba hammered already?
you could not hammer but instead vote someone you think is actually scumIn post 5332, Baezu wrote:AK and desp are null to scum. I know bulba is at L-1 but I'm not sure I want to hammer.
6 days before deadline and no additional people have promised to lynch Nero Cain with you.In post 5289, Bulbazak wrote:We have 8 days before deadline. I'm in no hurry to move my vote. Let's talk.
after this?In post 5308, Rena wrote:If I'm no lynched today: hey dude, if you're a town PR who blocked me, don't do that again? x.x I'm pretty sure KK targetted ThAd anyway and thats why neither of us could action.
What did you conclude?In post 5216, CrashTextDummie wrote:I don't remember this, let me check it out.In post 5210, ffullisade wrote:This was huge, CTD.In post 5204, Nachomamma8 wrote:You don't have a problem with her saying that she was getting suspicious of me because of the cases against me and then being completely unable to come close to summarizing any of the cases against me?In post 5199, CrashTextDummie wrote:To my knowledge, Rena hasn't done anything heinous either (except under-contribute, which in her case is more likely the result of her never really getting into the game but sticking around because she drew a PR, than of her being scum, in my opinion).
Nacho gave her 10 minutes. She replied after 9 minutes and change. It's worth quoting.
In post 5043, Rena wrote:I can't find why people were voting you o.o I've got the buddying Bulbz (possibly) thing.
That didn't answer my question, why all of a sudden has your read on me changed?
In post 5217, CrashTextDummie wrote:Hm. I suppose the implication here is that she's fabricating reads/inventing reasons to suspect people and I can see that. It's hard to picture this coming from a pro-town mindset and I concede that it's a point against her.In post 5204, Nachomamma8 wrote:You don't have a problem with her saying that she was getting suspicious of me because of the cases against me and then being completely unable to come close to summarizing any of the cases against me?In post 5199, CrashTextDummie wrote:To my knowledge, Rena hasn't done anything heinous either (except under-contribute, which in her case is more likely the result of her never really getting into the game but sticking around because she drew a PR, than of her being scum, in my opinion).
This being multiball, she shouldn't have to invent reasons to suspect people as scum. It does look like bullshitting though, and that's more likely coming from scum not giving much of a shit than from town not giving much of a shit.
Still don't think she should be lynched today, as she's keeping ThAd from being messed with either way.
So if Bulbazak is lynched and flips scum, Nero is under suspicion for you, but we learn a lot if Bulbazak flips town? Do you think a Bulbazak town flip absolves Nero? If not, you're basically saying Nero should be lynched after Bulbazak regardless, as I can't imagine you think we'd learn more about someone else than Nero from a Bulbazak town flip.In post 5142, Rena wrote:This actually makes me think Nero is bussing Bulba. I think if Bulba flips scum, we definitely need to look at Nero. I find Nero's play change particularly concerning considering it changed when he was about to be lynched. However, why would scum want to put themselves out in the open like that? Unless he's scum with a powerless role or he was connected to Town on Day One.
I do agree with the rest of your points about him. I think even if Bulba flips town, we would learn a lot for tomorrow. Vote Bulba
yuck!!! I'd like to see something original from this slot before nightfall.In post 5332, Baezu wrote:Well I read through most of the thread and I actually agree with my predecessor's reads. Rena thad and nacho look scummy. AK and desp are null to scum. I know bulba is at L-1 but I'm not sure I want to hammer.
You have a scum read on this slot now?In post 5335, Nachomamma8 wrote:While if you come over here we can have Thad,Baezuand Amethyst Kitty and actually get a lynch. How much longer are you going to try to push your vanity wagon through
No.In post 5341, Nero Cain wrote:You have a scum read on this slot now?
Ok, I trust your read if it's that strong. I still want you to address this, though, since it's my major concern:In post 5337, Nachomamma8 wrote:after this?In post 5308, Rena wrote:If I'm no lynched today: hey dude, if you're a town PR who blocked me, don't do that again? x.x I'm pretty sure KK targetted ThAd anyway and thats why neither of us could action.
i can't call it a rayfrost read but it's pretty damn close.
In post 5289, Bulbazak wrote:I thought for sure that town had another investigative role besides Eddie (rolecop is kinda weak, imo), and given the ninja flip, watcher seemed to fit the bill. I also would think at this point that another investigative role would have enough information to start making headway in the game via PoE, and would have thus shared results. I guess they could just be playing it safe for another day, but the longer the game goes without such a claim, the more I think that Rena is our last investigative role. Now if there's something wrong with my train of thought, please inform me, but I see no reason to lynch what could be our last investigative role at this time.In post 5253, Nachomamma8 wrote:do you believe all of our investigative roles have been outed?In post 5251, Bulbazak wrote:@Nacho: Do you honestly think that rolecop was the only investigative role that we had?
I didn't say that. Given what's flipped, it makes perfect sense for there to be a watcher. Nacho says that it doesn't, because watcher would be too powerful and that we likely (?) have another informative role. However, I find that unlikely, since we're on d4, and I'm sure that if we had another informative role that they'd have something worth producing. I just don't see it. I want Nacho to explain how that version of events makes sense, but not us having a watcher.In post 5344, Nero Cain wrote:So you want any other investigation roles to claim?
Cool, maybe summarize and break them down, for starters.In post 5332, Baezu wrote:Well I read through most of the thread and I actually agree with my predecessor's reads. Rena thad and nacho look scummy. AK and desp are null to scum. I know bulba is at L-1 but I'm not sure I want to hammer. If we reach deadline I will hammer but for now I feel he's null. If you have a specific person on whom you'd like me to give specific reads let me know. I'll write more once I'm on a computer