La Isla de la Muerte (Game over!)

Sakura Hana · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:07 am

Hi GiF

Who · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:07 am

In post 49, Hydrochloric Hydra wrote:JASON IS TOWN.
KLICK IS A JESTER.
SAKURA IS TOWN.
WAYNEGG IS PROBABLY TOWN.
DISCUSS.

Do you have any reasons?

Hydrochloric Hydra · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:11 am

In post 51, Who wrote:
In post 49, Hydrochloric Hydra wrote:JASON IS TOWN.
KLICK IS A JESTER.
SAKURA IS TOWN.
WAYNEGG IS PROBABLY TOWN.
DISCUSS.
Do you have any reasons?

VIBE
OBVIOUS
A LITTLE BIT OF META
GUT

A+ REASONS RIIIGHT HERE

StrangerCoug · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:12 am

VOTE COUNT

boxxy (1): waynegg
JasonWazza (1): Ten_Heavens
Sakura Hana (2): boxxy, Belisarius
SalmonellaDoctor (2): Hydrochloric Hydra, Klick
TMTOLBTWNTOF (1): Mitzi
waynegg (3): SalmonellaDoctor, JasonWazza, Sakura Hana
Who (1): PeregrineV
Not voting (7): Desperado, Karnage, Saki, Skullduggery, TMTOLBTWNTOF, Who, Zoidberg

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2013-08-19 00:03:14).

Who · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:14 am

Which head is that?

waynegg · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:16 am

Probably
Maybe
Doubt it
Is that what green means?

Says a vote is serious and can't provide why it's serious with three chances to do just that...

VOTE: SAKURA HANA

Hydrochloric Hydra · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:17 am

In post 54, Who wrote:Which head is that?

THE ONE THAT MAKES SENSE

Sakura Hana · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:19 am

In post 55, waynegg wrote:Probably
Maybe
Doubt it
Is that what green means?

Says a vote is serious and can't provide why it's serious with three chances to do just that...

VOTE: SAKURA HANA

It's serious because there's a reason behind the vote, i've explained this to you a bazillion times. Try again

Sakura Hana · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:22 am

Waynegg: Why is a baseless vote serious?
Sakura Hana: Because it's not baseless.
Waynegg: But your vote is random
Sakura Hana: I'd think a random vote by definition is more baseless than a serious one.
Waynegg: Stop dodging the question.
Sakura Hana: There's no answer to your question because a serious vote cannot be baseless.
Waynegg: Vote: Sakura Hana

waynegg · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:27 am

Well if there's a reason you should easily be able to elaborate on that reason. Which I asked you to do thrice. Which you failed to do thrice. Which means you had no reason. Which means you fell into the comfortable three slot on the wagon and tried to blend. Which means you're probably scum.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:28 am

A reason for why a baseless vote is serious?

Can you respond to that?

waynegg · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:28 am

That's how you explain a reason. Dodging =/= explaining. In fact, I'm pretty sure it's the exact opposite in meaning.

waynegg · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:29 am

Sakura Hana · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:29 am

Tell me how can a baseless vote be serious then, I'm listening

Sakura Hana · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:31 am

In post 38, waynegg wrote:A baseless vote is supposed to be taken as serious why?

Heck I'm quoting you, you're asking why is a baseless vote serious, not why i'm voting you, stop your fucking misrep and learn to at least pretend to be town and not be so damn obvious that you're scum.

waynegg · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:34 am

Wait for me to have a vote that's baseless at face value which I call serious and then ask me. My current vote isn't baseless. I can't answer

for you

as to why you called

you're

baseless vote serious. And in before 'thought so', because answering your question for you isn't what you originally asked of me.

waynegg · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:35 am

In post 64, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 38, waynegg wrote:A baseless vote is supposed to be taken as serious why?
Heck I'm quoting you, you're asking why is a baseless vote serious, not why i'm voting you, stop your fucking misrep and learn to at least pretend to be town and not be so damn obvious that you're scum.

She says to the other voice in her head...

Sakura Hana · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:35 am

I called it serious because it's not baseless, JESUS TALKING TO YOU IS LIKE TALKING TO A WALL.

waynegg · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:38 am

So of it isn't baseless, that means it has a reason. A reason which still hasn't been divulged.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:38 am

It is proven that scum doesn't know how to read, let alone they use their inability to read to push for mislynches with bad reasoning.

In post 21, SalmonellaDoctor wrote:
In post 8, waynegg wrote:Not investing that kind of time to deduce typos...
This is anti-town.
VOTE: waynegg

In post 28, Sakura Hana wrote:also I agree with that vote

Belisarius + waynegg scumteam calling it.

SalmonellaDoctor · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:40 am

In post 45, PeregrineV wrote:
Vote: Who

That deaf, dumb and blind kid sure plays a mean pinball.

Here we are, having a perfectly good wagon, and you bring back RVS? ):

Hydrochloric Hydra, you can only post in all caps, right?

Sakura, it's page three and you're calling the scum team?

~SD

Sakura Hana · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:41 am

Sure thing because they are both blind to the reason and kept saying my vote was baseless and pushed me for it.

Also i dont like people that advocate policy lynches, and 80% of the time they flip scum anyway.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:43 am

So here's my thought process:

Waynegg sees me vote him and asks me on something unrelated because it's not a baseless vote.
Belisarious agrees with him in me not answering yet I had already answering.
My reasoning had ALREADY been mentioned in my post and neither of them saw it, even tho seems like no one else had a problem with my vote.

Conclusion: Most probably both are scum.

waynegg · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:50 am

If it isn't a baseless vote, you would easily chirp your reason. You didn't chirp. I mean something g as simple as

It's based on applying pressure in order to force discussion.

Would have sufficed. Saying there's a reason and then failing to be able to provide that reason is scum . It should be killed with fire. A roasted Sakura luau.

waynegg · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:52 am

It's impossible to be blind to a reason which is never given. Serious isn't a reason.

Flail

Try again.