Didn't I say I would post more when I felt the thread would slow down?In post 972, Desperado wrote:It means that you wondered aloud why OGML is posting so much after only having one post D1, when you have also increased your post output by almost 8x (2 D1 vs 15 D2).
o:In post 967, No Brains Here wrote:Hey MattP
This is DGB
Seems like I'm the one that's irritating you! I was joking about going after you anyway, it was a way to tell you I might fake suspicion on you to save you from NKs but YOU LOST YOUR SENSE OF HUMOR. I know you're town.
Now if you could vote OGML, I'd be much obliged.
Never knew my name was Mara, was pretty sure that my name was Nero. Why don't you explain to me why its SOOOO important to move my vote?In post 893, OhGodMyLife wrote:"You derpwads?" Nice job passing the buck. Your vote counted just as much as everyone else's in getting Key lynched, but you're trying to abdicate responsibility. And now you won't join a wagon on someone you've been sniping at for a whole page because they're at L-6 and you don't want to rush things?In post 889, Sugar Cain wrote:I'm not really interested in rushing the day like you derpwads did yesterday. I know that our vote doesn't mean he'll be lynched ASAP but I also don't see a reason to move it right this second.
Too many scumbags, not enough lynches in a day.
Never knew my name was Mara, was pretty sure that my name was Nero. Why don't you explain to me why its SOOOO important to move my vote?In post 893, OhGodMyLife wrote:"You derpwads?" Nice job passing the buck. Your vote counted just as much as everyone else's in getting Key lynched, but you're trying to abdicate responsibility. And now you won't join a wagon on someone you've been sniping at for a whole page because they're at L-6 and you don't want to rush things?In post 889, Sugar Cain wrote:I'm not really interested in rushing the day like you derpwads did yesterday. I know that our vote doesn't mean he'll be lynched ASAP but I also don't see a reason to move it right this second.
Too many scumbags, not enough lynches in a day.
The dumb wagon that you claim to have known was dumb as it was happening but didn't do anything to stop?In post 975, pitoli wrote:Didn't I say I would post more when I felt the thread would slow down?In post 972, Desperado wrote:It means that you wondered aloud why OGML is posting so much after only having one post D1, when you have also increased your post output by almost 8x (2 D1 vs 15 D2).
OMGL didn't leave us anything yesterday, he was just another senseless vote on a dumbwagon.
If you're going to make posts like that AT LEAST vote for OGML.In post 980, Sugar Cain wrote:ugh, very annoyed at Matt. He has a town read on Brains but is cluttering up the thread with ranting about Mollie, and Mara wonders why I think the guy is a douche.
Oh cool complain about me having a pointless convo then come in when it's already over to call me a doucheIn post 980, Sugar Cain wrote:ugh, very annoyed at Matt. He has a town read on Brains but is cluttering up the thread with ranting about Mollie, and Mara wonders why I think the guy is a douche.
The dumb wagon I didn't do anything to stop because by the time I got to read the thread it was locked? Yep.In post 979, Desperado wrote:The dumb wagon that you claim to have known was dumb as it was happening but didn't do anything to stop?In post 975, pitoli wrote:Didn't I say I would post more when I felt the thread would slow down?In post 972, Desperado wrote:It means that you wondered aloud why OGML is posting so much after only having one post D1, when you have also increased your post output by almost 8x (2 D1 vs 15 D2).
OMGL didn't leave us anything yesterday, he was just another senseless vote on a dumbwagon.
dat hypocrisy. Why am I scum for this but Matt is town for doing the same thing?In post 981, Aj The Epic wrote:This is the pointless shit-fluff that helps prove you're scum not interested in advancing the town's objectives.
Yours is fake.In post 992, Sugar Cain wrote:dat hypocrisy. Why am I scum for this but Matt is town for doing the same thing?In post 981, Aj The Epic wrote:This is the pointless shit-fluff that helps prove you're scum not interested in advancing the town's objectives.
oh look at this. Here I am expressing annoyance @ Matt. So how can my annoyance @ Matt be "fake" if I was previously annoyed? ITT, its not and AJ is giving an excuse for why I caught him selectively scumhunting.In post 780, Sugar Cain wrote:Though it is funny how Matt whines and cries about HIS interrogations/gambits being interrupted but has no issue with disrupting others.