I echo matt's sentiment more than I agree with the actual point -- I could see someone initially making the argument OGML made, and then going back and thinking about it more and realizing the argument is not sound.In post 1025, No Brains Here wrote:I was saying that OMGL is scum for not considering that Jon Doe might have information NOT ABOUT THE SCUM KILL, BUT ABOUT THE VIG'S KILL. He just wanted to frame Jon Doe. That is not a townie mindset.
That 'going back and thinking about it more' thing didn't happen and it turned into a 'la la you scumslipped mantra'.
VOTE: ogml
@jon -- I see that GIF did in fact say you said he said. It's a dumb thing for him to have said but whatever. I don't agree with your case in GIF at all -- I think that the page he was on concerning the SK wagon is a really genuine page to have been on at that time of day, and I just think you're applying a blanket to a situation that really just doesn't work here.
@mollie -- I looked at sangres slot; 353 and 376 rub me wrong, especially considering that the unexplained SK vote preceded it by a lot, and just that it seems to kinda skirt around the more important part of voting for scum and lynching them and shit. I don't know how to explain the point I'm trying to make here very well.
p-edit
@amrun - basically jon talked about trust fund's death implying that it was the scum kill; jon later justified this with flavor hints (which is wrong in this case, but plausible)
ogml came back and said jon was scum for slipping cause the only way he'd know trust fund was the scum kill is if his team had done it. DGB pointed out that the hole here is that jon could be a vig who shot majiffy but OGML has been adamant at pushing this as a scumslip.
But people are ignoring that Dan is probably right and it's Majiffy who was likely killed by scum -- I just think jon looked for flavor hints where there weren't any.
